Decreased Juvenile Arson and Firesetting Recidivism after Implementation of a Multidisciplinary Prevention Program
Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma, Burn and Emergency Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. The Journal of trauma
(Impact Factor: 2.96).
08/2002; 53(2):260-4; discussion 264-6. DOI: 10.1097/00005373-200208000-00012
In 1999, we developed the multidisciplinary Trauma Burn Outreach Prevention Program (TBOPP), which focuses on the medical and societal consequences of firesetting behavior. The basis for this program development was a 17% increase in pediatric burn admissions. The purpose of this study was to determine the value of this trauma burn center prevention program from a financial, clinical, and recidivism perspective.
Juveniles (ages 4-17 years) were enrolled into our 1-day program on the basis of referrals from the county court system, fire departments, schools, and parents. The program's interactive content focuses on the medical, financial, legal, and societal impact of firesetting behavior, with emphasis on individual accountability and responsibility. The court system and fire departments tracked all episodes of firesetting behavior within their respective communities. Arson is defined as behavior with the intent to produce damage, whereas firesetting is defined as having no ill intent. The recidivism rate was determined using fire department and court follow-up records. Follow-up was from 8 months to 2.5 years. A random control group that did not receive TBOPP education (noTBOPP group) with identical entry criteria was used for comparison. Institutional review board approval was obtained.
There were 132 juveniles in the TBOPP group (66 arsonists and 66 firesetters) and 102 juveniles in the noTBOPP group (33 arsonists and 66 firesetters). Fifty-nine TBOPP participants had a medical history of behavioral disorders. Property damage for arson averaged $4,040, with additional court costs of $1,135 per incident. Family environment was an independent predictor for risk of repeat offense. The odds ratio for risk of repeat offense in foster care was 17.9 (p < 0.05) as compared with two-parent homes. The recidivism rate was 1 of 32 (<1%) for the TBOPP group and 37 of 102 (36%) for the noTBOPP group (adjusted odds ratio, 0.02; p < 0.001).
When compared with the noTBOPP group, TBOPP participants had essentially no recidivism. The financial impact of arson behavior was over $6,000 per incident. The implementation of a juvenile firesetting prevention program has demonstrable benefits to the participants and to society.
Available from: Clive R Hollin
- "However, a weakness of these studies was the lack of control groups. Two studies that found positive effects on fire setting behaviours among participants of educational interventions as compared with control groups are reported by Franklin et al. (2002) and Williams and Jones (1989). Of 132 juveniles attending the 1-day programme evaluated by Franklin et al., only one reoffended during the follow-up period as compared with 37 recidivists in the control group of 102 juveniles. "
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Objectives. Arson is a serious problem that has high costs in both financial and non-financial terms. It is important that effective provision to intervene with arsonists and young fire setters is available.Method. A national survey was conducted of organizations delivering interventions to arsonists and young fire setters. This survey included fire and rescue services, probation areas, youth offending services, forensic mental health units, several government departments, and the National Association for the Care and Resettlement of Offenders. The survey was followed by site visits to eight organizations to conduct interviews with relevant staff.Results. The majority of interventions for children and adolescents were provided by fire and rescue services, often in conjunction with local youth offending services. Some forensic mental health units provided interventions, but no specialist provision for arsonists appeared to be available in either the prison or probation services. The site visits and interviews revealed areas of good practice across the organizations visited, and highlighted areas where developments might be made to improve services.Conclusions. The findings are discussed in light of the available literature, and recommendations made for future practice.
02/2007; 12(1):101-116. DOI:10.1348/135532505X85927
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Juvenile firestarting is an especially dangerous and costly problem affecting communities nationwide. The problem of children and fire has stimulated a small but growing research literature on interventions for reducing recidivism among juvenile firestarters. There is little known, however, about which elements of promising interventions are associated with reduced recidivism. The authors review the research literatures on the characteristics of juvenile firestarters and their families and the treatments used to prevent these children from setting fires again, and they describe an integrative theoretical approach to treatment. In addition, a novel, collaborative, family-centered intervention for juvenile firestarters is presented. The importance of using theoretically informed, fire-specific assessment procedures and linking data to treatment conceptualization, planning, and delivery is discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
Psychological Services 06/2004; 1(2):158-168. DOI:10.1037/1541-15126.96.36.199 · 1.08 Impact Factor
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Fires set by young people account for a large proportion of fire-related public property damage and deaths. Law enforcement and mental health professionals alike seek ways to prevent fire-setters from repeating their criminal behaviour. This article presents a comprehensive review of empirical studies of fire-setting recidivism. The purpose of this study was to identify potential predictors of recidivism in children and adolescents who set fires. Six articles and two dissertation abstracts were selected for systematic review according to specific inclusion/exclusion criteria. Previous involvement in fire-setting behaviour was found to be the best single predictor of recidivistic fire-setting. In addition, recidivists were noted to have greater levels of interest in fire and fire-related activities, displayed more covert antisocial behaviours, and were more likely to be male and older than non-recidivists. Recidivists also reported poorer social skills and higher levels of family dysfunction than other fire-setters. These factors should be further investigated and evaluated, and incorporated in risk assessment tools, interventions, and outcome measures.
Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology 03/2006; 17(1):151-164. DOI:10.1080/14789940500441501 · 0.88 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.