Pathogenesis of venous thromboembolism.

Sezione di Medicina Interna e Cardiovascolare, Dipartimento di Medicina Interna, Università di Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Current opinion in pulmonary medicine (Impact Factor: 3.12). 10/2002; 8(5):360-4. DOI: 10.1097/00063198-200209000-00003
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Three factors are related with the pathogenesis of venous thrombosis: (1) blood stasis, (2) hypercoagulability, and (3) vessel damage. Local and systemic factors are implicated in blood stasis. Remarkable advances have been recently achieved regarding the understanding of the concept of hypercoagulability, with special emphasis to thrombophilic molecular abnormalities. Increased thromboembolic risk has been described in patients with antithrombin III, protein C, or protein S deficiencies as well as factor V Leiden, prothrombin mutation G20210A, or hyperhomocystinemia. Vessel wall has a remarkable role in protecting against and in promoting thrombosis. The role of inflammation on venous thrombosis is under investigation.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To determine the incidence of arterial and venous thromboembolic (VTE) events, to determine the effect of raloxifene on the incidence of combined vascular (arterial and VTE) events, and to identify patient characteristics associated with these vascular events, in women participating in the MORE trial. In a post hoc analysis using MORE data, arterial, VTE, and combined vascular event rates were compared between participants receiving placebo (n = 2,576) and those receiving 60 mg/d of raloxifene (n = 2,557). Baseline characteristics were compared between those who did and did not experience an arterial event. The same analysis was performed for VTE events. Overall, during a mean follow-up time of 41 months, 178 women experienced an arterial event and 40 experienced a VTE event. In the placebo group, the incidence of arterial events exceeded VTE events by at least sevenfold. Raloxifene had no significant effect on the incidence of combined vascular events in the overall cohort (hazard ratio 0.95, 95% CI, 0.73-1.24). In a subset of women retrospectively determined to be at increased cardiovascular risk, raloxifene was associated with a lower incidence of combined vascular events (hazard ratio 0.63, 95% CI, 0.40-0.97). Baseline characteristics differed between those who did and those who did not experience an arterial event, but this was generally not the case for VTE events. Arterial events were more common than VTE events. The characteristics of women experiencing an arterial event differed from those experiencing a VTE event. Raloxifene had a neutral effect on the risk of combined vascular events in the overall population, and was associated with a reduced combined vascular event rate in women at increased cardiovascular risk. Additional studies are needed to confirm the effect of raloxifene on overall vascular outcomes.
    Menopause 12(4):444-52. · 3.16 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Recent report, particularly the Women's Health Initiative, demonstrated that hormone therapy with combined estrogen plus progestin increased the incidence of heart attacks, stroke, blood clots, breast cancer and dementia in women over 65 years old. We investigated the role of synthetic progestins in initiating the adverse events associated with estrogen therapy. We used a fluorescence imaging technique, which allows video microscopic recordings of blood flow, blood vessel morphology and activities of various blood cells in a live animal. The acute peripheral and cerebrovascular responses were measured following intraperitoneal (5 or 10 mg) or intravenous (10 or 100 microg) administration of progesterone, synthetic progestins (medroxyprogesterone acetate and norethindrone) or estrogens (conjugated equine estrogens and 17 beta-estradiol). In both peripheral and cerebral vasculature, synthetic progestins caused endothelial disruption, accumulation of monocytes in the vessel wall, platelet activation and clot formation, which are early events in atherosclerosis, inflammation and thrombosis. Natural progesterone or estrogens did not show such toxicity. The risk associate with combined estrogen plus progestin therapy may be a consequence of vascular actions of progestins. Using progestins with minimal vascular toxicity may lead to safer estrogen preparations for menopausal women.
    Climacteric 01/2004; 6(4):293-301. · 1.96 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The incidence of venous thrombosis (VT) increases sharply with age: it is very rare in young individuals (<1 per 10,000 per year) but increases to ∼ 1% per year in the elderly, which indicates that aging is one of the strongest and most prevalent risk factor for venous thrombosis. The cause of this steep age gradient is as yet, unexplained. The aim of this review was to provide an overview of studies on the effect of conventional risk factors as well as age-specific risk factors for thrombosis in the elderly. Limited data are available on risk factors for thrombosis in the elderly, i.e. all results are based on small study groups. Results indicate that, of the conventional risk factors, malignant disease, the presence of co-morbidities and the genetic risk factors factor (F)V Leiden and the prothrombin mutation seem to be associated with an increased risk of venous thrombosis. In the elderly, the population attributable risk (PAR) of malignancy is approximately 35%, for co-morbidities a PAR up to 25% is found, and the contribution of genetic risk factors to the thrombosis incidence is estimated to be 7-22%. Age-specific risk factors of thrombosis, i.e. endothelial dysfunction and frailty may be important in the explanation of the increased incidence of VT in the elderly. In conclusion, as aging is a major risk factor for thrombosis, further identification of the risk factors for thrombosis in the elderly is needed to elucidate the age gradient of the incidence of VT and to target preventive measures.
    Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis 10/2010; 8(10):2105-12. · 6.08 Impact Factor