Progress and controversy in the study of posttraumatic stress disorder.

Department of Psychology, Harvard University, 33 Kirkland Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA.
Annual Review of Psychology (Impact Factor: 20.53). 02/2003; 54:229-52. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145112
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Research on posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) has been notable for controversy as well as progress. This article concerns the evidence bearing on the most contentious issues in the field of traumatic stress: broadening of the definition of trauma, problems with the dose-response model of PTSD, distortion in the recollection of trauma, concerns about "phony combat vets," psychologically toxic guilt as a traumatic stressor, risk factors for PTSD, possible brain-damaging effects of stress hormones, recovered memories of childhood sexual abuse, and the politics of trauma.

1 Bookmark
  • Journal of Divorce & Remarriage 01/2014; 55(1):49-63. DOI:10.1080/10502556.2013.862094
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The diagnostic criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) were substantially revised for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders—5th edition (DSM-5). This in turn necessitated revision of DSM-correspondent assessment measures of PTSD. We describe the various changes to the PTSD diagnostic criteria and the corresponding changes to National Center for PTSD measures. We also discuss the implications of the new criteria for assessment of trauma exposure and PTSD. Although the DSM-5 version of PTSD departs significantly in some respects from previous versions, we conclude that there is fundamental continuity with the original DSM-III conceptualization of PTSD as a chronic, debilitating mental disorder that develops in response to catastrophic life events.
    Psychological Injury and Law 06/2014; 7(2):93-107. DOI:10.1007/s12207-014-9191-1
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this paper, we examine the relationship between episodic foresight and anxiety from an evolutionary perspective, proposing that together they confer an advantage for modifying present moment decision-making and behaviour in the light of potential future threats to fitness. We review the body of literature on the role of episodic foresight in anxiety, from both proximate and ultimate perspectives. We propose that anxious feelings associated with episodic simulation of possible threat-related future events serve to imbue these simulations with motivational currency. Episodic and semantic details of a future threat may be insufficient for motivating its avoidance, but anxiety associated with a simulation can provoke adaptive threat management. As such, we detail how anxiety triggered by a self-generated, threat-related future simulation prepares the individual to manage that threat (in terms of its likelihood and/or consequences) over greater temporal distances than observed in other animals. We then outline how anxiety subtypes may represent specific mechanisms for predicting and managing particular classes of fitness threats. This approach offers an inroad for understanding the nature of characteristic future thinking patterns in anxiety disorders and serves to illustrate the adaptive function of the mechanism from which clinical anxiety deviates. Episodic foresight can elicit anxiety even when there are no immediate environmental cues of fitness threats. Anxiety may be a mechanism by which simulations of future events are imbued with motivational currency, to ensure the management of potential future threats to fitness. Subtypes of anxiety disorders may reflect different mechanisms for effectively managing certain potential future threats to fitness. Understanding the utility of episodic foresight in anxiety disorders may lead to new insights into diagnosis and treatment. © 2015 The British Psychological Society.
    03/2015; DOI:10.1111/bjc.12080


1 Download
Available from