Article

Reconstruction of the temporomandibular joint autogenous compared with alloplastic.

Specialist Registrar, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Cheltenham General Hospital, Sandford Road, Cheltenham, GL53 7AN, UK.
British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (Impact Factor: 1.13). 09/2002; 40(4):296-9. DOI: 10.1016/S0266-4356(02)00139-0
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The aims of and indications for temporomandibular joint (TMJ) reconstruction are well-established but the method of reconstruction is controversial. We describe a retrospective, two-centre audit of 49 patients treated with costochondral grafting and 50 patients treated with alloplastic joints. The characteristics of the patients were similar in both centres and the minimum follow-up period was 2 years. For each patient a number of variables were recorded including both subjective scores (pain and interference with eating) and objective data (interincisal distance). Patients in both groups showed an improvement in symptoms but more patients required reoperation in the autogenous group.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Niall M H Mcleod, Mar 28, 2014
0 Followers
 · 
167 Views
  • Source
    Advanced Materials Research 03/2012; DOI:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.488-489.996
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Finite element analysis is a useful analytical tool for the design of biomedical implants. The aim of this study was to investigate the behavior of temporomandibular joint implants with multiple design variables of the screws used for fixation of the implant. A commercially available implant with full mandible was analyzed using a finite element software package. The effects of different design variables such as orientation, diameter and stem length of the screws on the stress distribution in bone for two different surgical procedures were investigated. Considering the microstrain in bone as a principal factor, the acceptable ranges for screw diameter and length were determined. Parallel orientation of the screws performed better from a stress point of view when compared to the zig-zag orientation. Sufficient contact between the implant collar and mandibular condyle was shown to reduce the peak stresses which may lead to long term success. The distance between screw holes in the parallel orientation was much closer when compared to the zig-zag orientation. However, the stresses in bone near the screw hole area for the parallel orientation were within acceptable limits.
    Journal of Biomechanics 08/2011; 44(14):2584-7. DOI:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.06.002 · 2.50 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The literature on total alloplastic temporomandibular joint (TMJ) reconstructions is encouraging, and studies on total alloplastic TMJ replacements' outcomes showed acceptable improvements in terms of both pain levels and jaw function. Nevertheless, a better standardization of both surgical and post-surgical phases should further improve the efficacy of treatment. The case report describes the surgical and post-surgical phases of treatment in a patient who underwent a total unilateral joint replacement for TMJ ankylosis, along with a proposal for a post-surgical rehabilitation protocol providing strong passive and active physiotherapy and hyaluronic acid injections to the contralateral joint. The post-operative (PO) course was uneventful. The patient showed a marked improvement up to about 60% in mouth opening and had no pain on either side at the 1-year follow-up. In a patient with unilateral TMJ ankylosis, total TMJ replacement was successful. A carefully tailored post-surgical rehabilitation protocol helped the patient to gain a clinically significant improvement in jaw function. Longer follow-up periods are needed to assess the long-term maintenance of results. Clinical trials are strongly recommended to assess the relative efficacy of different PO protocols.
    Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery 10/2008; 36(7):403-9. DOI:10.1016/j.jcms.2007.11.007 · 2.60 Impact Factor