Article

Development, validation and utilisation of food-frequency questionnaires - a review.

Nutrition Epidemiology Group, Division of Public Health, Nuffield Institute for Health, 71-75 Clarendon Road, University of Leeds, UK.
Public Health Nutrition (Impact Factor: 2.25). 09/2002; 5(4):567-87. DOI: 10.1079/PHN2001318
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The purpose of this review is to provide guidance on the development, validation and use of food-frequency questionnaires (FFQs) for different study designs. It does not include any recommendations about the most appropriate method for dietary assessment (e.g. food-frequency questionnaire versus weighed record).
A comprehensive search of electronic databases was carried out for publications from 1980 to 1999. Findings from the review were then commented upon and added to by a group of international experts.
Recommendations have been developed to aid in the design, validation and use of FFQs. Specific details of each of these areas are discussed in the text.
FFQs are being used in a variety of ways and different study designs. There is no gold standard for directly assessing the validity of FFQs. Nevertheless, the outcome of this review should help those wishing to develop or adapt an FFQ to validate it for its intended use.

3 Bookmarks
 · 
210 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Identifying toddlers at dietary risk is crucial for determining who requires intervention to improve dietary patterns and reduce health consequences. The objectives of the present study were to develop a simple tool that assesses toddlers' dietary risk and investigate its reliability and validity. The nineteen-item Toddler Dietary Questionnaire (TDQ) is informed by dietary patterns observed in Australian children aged 14 (n 552) and 24 (n 493) months and the Australian dietary guidelines. It assesses the intake of 'core' food groups (e.g. fruit, vegetables and dairy products) and 'non-core' food groups (e.g. high-fat, high-sugar and/or high-salt foods and sweetened beverages) over the previous 7 d, which is then scored against a dietary risk criterion (0-100; higher score = higher risk). Parents of toddlers aged 12-36 months (Socio-Economic Index for Areas decile range 5-9) were asked to complete the TDQ for their child (n 111) on two occasions, 3·2 (sd 1·8) weeks apart, to assess test-retest reliability. They were also asked to complete a validated FFQ from which the risk score was calculated and compared with the TDQ-derived risk score (relative validity). Mean scores were highly correlated and not significantly different for reliability (intra-class correlation = 0·90, TDQ1 30·2 (sd 8·6) v. TDQ2 30·9 (sd 8·9); P= 0·14) and validity (r 0·83, average TDQ ((TDQ1+TDQ2)/2) 30·5 (sd 8·4) v. FFQ 31·4 (sd 8·1); P= 0·05). All the participants were classified into the same (reliability 75 %; validity 79 %) or adjacent (reliability 25 %; validity 21 %) risk category (low (0-24), moderate (25-49), high (50-74) and very high (75-100)). Overall, the TDQ is a valid and reliable screening tool for identifying at-risk toddlers in relatively advantaged samples.
    The British journal of nutrition. 06/2014;
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The effectiveness of clinic-based pulmonary rehabilitation in advanced COPD is well established, but few data exist for less severe patients treated in alternative settings. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether a novel, community-based exercise program (CBE) was feasible and effective for patients with moderate COPD.
    BMC Pulmonary Medicine 08/2014; 14(1):125. · 2.76 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this systematic review is to provide a critical appraisal of evidence on the validity and reliability of self-reported measures of foods and nutrients in pregnancy. PubMed and EMBASE databases were investigated, and 54 studies were included. Food-frequency questionnaires had acceptable evidence of validity compared with biomarkers (r between 0.04 and 0.58; k=19), 24-hour recall (r between 0.12 and 0.63; k=11), and food records (r between 0.28 and 0.65; k=12). Dietary history (r between 0.07 and 0.47; k=7) and food records (r between 0.25 and 0.53; k=7) had acceptable evidence of validity compared with biomarkers. Twenty-four-hour recall had poor evidence of validity against biomarkers. Evidence on reliability was good for food-frequency questionnaires, acceptable for dietary history, and inconclusive for 24-hour recall. The results suggest that food-frequency questionnaires and food records have the strongest evidence of validity in assessing nutrition during pregnancy, and further studies are needed to validate 24-hour recall and dietary history.
    Current Nutrition Reports. 07/2014; 3(3):245-280.

Full-text (2 Sources)

View
334 Downloads
Available from
May 31, 2014