Classification of anti-FcepsilonRI and anti-IgE autoantibodies in chronic idiopathic urticaria and correlation with disease severity.

St John's Institute of Dermatology and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Guy's, King's and St Thomas' School of Medicine, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London.
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (Impact Factor: 11.48). 10/2002; 110(3):492-9.
Source: PubMed


Circulating autoantibodies against FcepsilonRI, IgE, or both occur in approximately one third of patients with chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU), but not all autoantibodies initiate histamine release.
We sought to classify patients with CIU into subsets on the basis of serum bioactivity and immunoreactivity and to examine the relationship between newly defined subtype and disease severity.
Sera from patients with CIU (n = 78), dermog-raphism (n = 15), and cholinergic urticaria (n = 10) and sera from healthy subjects (n = 39) were analyzed by means of Western blot analysis for anti-FcepsilonRI autoantibodies and for histamine release from basophils and dermal mast cells. In vivo reactivity of autologous serum was tested by means of intradermal injection, and CIU severity was determined on the basis of clinical interview.
We classified sera from patients with CIU into 5 subsets: immunoreactive histamine-releasing anti-FcepsilonRI autoantibodies (n = 20 [26%]); immunoreactive anti-FcepsilonRI autoantibodies without histamine-releasing activity (n = 12 [15%]); anti-IgE-like autoantibodies (n = 7 [9%]); serum containing a mast cell-specific histamine-releasing factor (n = 7 [9%]); and sera with no identifiable factor (n = 32 [41%]). Patients with serum histamine-releasing activity had more severe urticaria than patients without such activity. Positive skin test responses to autologous sera were associated with histamine-releasing anti-FcepsilonRI autoantibodies but not with non-histamine-releasing anti-FcepsilonRI autoantibodies. Neither healthy subjects nor patients with dermographism or cholinergic urticaria had his-tamine-releasing anti-FcepsilonRI autoantibodies.
These data support the specificity of functional anti-FcepsilonRI autoantibodies to CIU. The identification of distinctive subsets of patients suggests that other pathogenic mechanisms occur in CIU in addition to direct ligation of FcepsilonRI by autoantibodies causing dermal mast cell degranulation. Elucidating these mechanisms might lead to new treatments for CIU.

Download full-text


Available from: Paul T Seed,
  • Source
    • "The study involves 51 patients (40 women and 11 men) with mean age of 42.27 years, range 10 - 82 years old. All our acute urticaria cases were of grade 2 (according to Sabroe et al’s classification) [19], at the time when blood samples were collected. In our group, there were no cases associated either with angioedema or with such a gravity that might impose the hospitalization of patients. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Urticaria is a skin disease that affects approximately 5% of the general population and manifests itself, not only as an acute but also as a chronic disease. The etiology of the disease varies as well as its clinical manifestations which extend from the presence of urticarial hives to the potentially mortal angioedema. There is a great interest to the disease not only due to its special clinical manifestation but also due to its pathogenetic mechanism. New data in the medical bibliography support the participation of interleukins (ILs) in the pathophysiology of urticaria. The aim of the study is to contribute in the comprehension of possible participation of certain ILs in the pathogenesis of acute urticaria. Our study concerns four ILs, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8 and IL-10, simultaneously and their quantitative changes during the acute phase of urticaria as well as 2 weeks after drug administration. Moreover, ILs levels of patients were compared with those of matched healthy controls. All measurements have been done by the ELISA method. The statistical analysis was done by SPSS. The results present increased levels (in 51 patients vs. 22 matched healthy controls) of all four ILs during the acute phase. Especially for IL-4 this increase was statistically very significant (P < 0.001). Statistically marginally significant decrease was also observed for IL-10 concentrations (P < 0.059), for the two blood samples (acute phase and 2 weeks later). It is suggested by the present study that certain ILs might play an important role in the pathogenetic mechanism of urticaria. IL-4 and IL-10 participation seems to be relatively more significant. Possibly, ILs, liberated by mast cells, induce an influx of leukocytes in the dermis, therefore participating in the development of acute urticaria inflammation.
    Journal of Clinical Medicine Research 04/2014; 6(2):133-7. DOI:10.14740/jocmr1645w
  • Source
    • "For more than 50% of patients with CU, the underlying cause has not been identified.12 However, up to one-third of patients with chronic idiopathic urticaria have autoantibodies to FcεRI (a high-affinity receptor for IgE), and about 10% have IgE autoantibodies.13 These autoantibodies can cause mast cell degranulation, and most CU symptoms result from the degranulation of skin mast cells. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Chronic urticaria (CU) is a common and debilitating disease, and the need for effective treatment has increased. Omalizumab may be an alternative regimen in patients with CU who do not respond to conventional treatments. The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy and to observe the clinical results of omlizumab in patients with refractory CU. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 26 patients with refractory CU who were treated with omalizumab. Omalizumab was administered every 2 or 4 weeks, depending on body weight and the total serum IgE level, for 24 weeks. Fourteen patients (53.8%) achieved remission after the treatment; they had a significantly higher prevalence of personal (P=0.033) and family history of allergic diseases (P=0.002) than those who did not achieve remission. During omalizumab treatment, the urticaria activity score declined significantly (12.11±1.97 to 2.7±4.23; P=0.001) and the CU-quality of life score improved significantly (34.65±13.58 to 60.88±11.11; P=0.004). There were significant decreases in the use of systemic steroids (42.3%-11.5%; P=0.027) and immunomodulators (65.4%-19.2%; P=0.002). The dose of antihistamines required to control CU also decreased significantly (215.66±70.06 to 60.85±70.53 mg/week of loratadine equivalents; P<0.001). No serious adverse event was noted. These findings suggest that omalizumab can be an effective and safe treatment in patients with refractory CU.
    Allergy, asthma & immunology research 11/2012; 4(6):357-61. DOI:10.4168/aair.2012.4.6.357 · 2.43 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Four proof-of-concept trials investigated omalizumab in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria who remained symptomatic despite antihistamine therapy [16, 17, 18, 19]. It is known that approximately 30% to 50% of patients with chronic idiopathic urticaria produce IgG autoantibodies against either IgE or its high-affinity receptor (FcɛRI) [20]. A subgroup of patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria exhibits IgE antibodies directed against autoantigens, such as thyroperoxidase [19]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We report 2 patients with cold urticaria with different response to treatment with omalizumab (Xolair(®)). Cold contact urticaria (CCU) is a common subtype of physical urticaria. It is characterized by the development of wheal and/or angioedema within minutes after cold contact. Clinical manifestation of CCU can range from mild, localized whealing to life-threatening anaphylactic shock reactions. Omalizumab has been described to be useful in cases of chronic urticaria and may be an interesting option for treatment of CCU. We describe one patient with significant and long-lasting improvement of symptoms and one without any improvement after anti-immunoglobulin E therapy. In our case reports, we want to highlight that there is still a small group of patients without benefit from omalizumab treatment. It is necessary to identify this minor subgroup of patients where omalizumab does not represent an effective treatment possibility.
    Case Reports in Dermatology 09/2012; 4(3):275-80. DOI:10.1159/000346284
Show more