Article

Does profound hypothermic circulatory arrest improve survival in patients with acute type a aortic dissection?

Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif 94305-5247, USA.
Circulation (Impact Factor: 15.2). 10/2002; 106(12 Suppl 1):I218-28.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT No evidence exists that profound hypothermic circulatory arrest (PHCA) improves survival or reduces the likelihood of distal aortic reoperation in patients with acute type A aortic dissection.
Records of 307 patients with acute type A aortic dissection from 1967 to 1999 were retrospectively reviewed. The influence of repair using PHCA (n=121) versus without PHCA (n=186) on death and freedom from distal aortic reoperation was analyzed using multivariable Cox regression models. Propensity score analysis identified a subset of 152 comparable patients in 3 quintiles (QIII-V) in which the effects of PHCA (n=113) versus no PHCA (n=39) were further compared.
For all patients, 30-day, 1-year, and 5-year survival estimates were 81+/-2%, 74+/-3%, and 63+/-3% (+/-1 SE). Survival rates and actual freedom from distal aortic reoperation was not significantly different between treatment methods in the entire patient cohort nor in the matched patients in quintiles III-V. Treatment method was not associated with differences in early major complications, late survival, or distal aortic reoperation rates in the entire patient sample or in quintiles III-V.
Aortic repair with or without circulatory arrest was associated with comparable early complications, survival, and distal aortic reoperation rates in patients with acute type A aortic dissection. Despite the lack of concrete evidence favoring the use of PHCA, it does no harm, and most of our group uses PHCA regularly because of its practical technical advantages and theoretical potential merit.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
80 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Acute aortic syndrome (AAS) describes the acute presentation of patients with characteristic «aortic pain» caused by one of several life threatening thoracic aortic conditions including aortic dissection, intramural hematoma or penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer. Recent advances in imaging and therapeutic techniques have emphasized the importance of early diagnosis of acute aortic syndrome because it is crucial for survival. Not just because the cardiovascular community knows little, the management of AAS remains a therapeutic challenge, while diverse surgical and percutaneous strategies for the treatment of aortic syndromes are continuously evolving. As a result of increasing knowledge and better management strategies in this area, the outcomes of patients treated for acute aortic syndromes have improved. This review discusses the etiology and clinical presentation, but mainly focuses on modern management and both established and emerging therapeutic approaches to acute aortic syndromes.
    Revista Espanola De Cardiologia - REV ESPAN CARDIOL. 01/2007; 60(5):526-541.
  • Source
    01/2009;
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Results: The surgical and in-hospital mortality was 8.69% (2 of 23 patients), with no late death during a mean follow-up period of 36.5 17.3 months. Mean circulatory arrest duration was 47.0 12.0 minutes. Complications encounteredincludedrespiratoryfailurein2patientsundergoingtracheostomyandminorstrokeinoneofthemwith improvement later. Postoperative bleeding which required reoperation happened in 7 patients. Biological glue was used in late of our series. One patient received reoperation 3 years later for progressive dilatation of descending aortic aneurysm. Conclusion: Femoral arterial cannulation and retrograde cerebral perfusion continue to be useful selections for acute type Aaortic dissection repair. Conservative surgical strategy avoiding the replacement of the aortic arch may be an alternative option for less experienced surgeons in a community hospital.
    01/2006;

Full-text

Download
1 Download
Available from