Cultural sensitivity in universal family-based prevention interventions. Prevent Sci

Department of Health Promotion and Education, University of Utah, Salt Lake City 84112, USA.
Prevention Science (Impact Factor: 2.63). 10/2002; 3(3):241-6. DOI: 10.1023/A:1019902902119
Source: PubMed


Because of the substantial impact of families on the developmental trajectories of children, family interventions should be a critical ingredient in comprehensive prevention programs. Very few family interventions have been adapted to be culturally sensitive for different ethnic groups. This paper examines the research literature on whether culturally adapting family interventions improves retention and outcome effectiveness. Because of limited research on the topic, the prevention research field is divided on the issue. Factors to consider for cultural adaptations of family-focused prevention are presented. Five research studies testing the effectiveness of the generic version of the Strengthening Families Program (SFP) compared to culturally-adapted versions for African Americans, Hispanic, Asian/Pacific Islander, and American Indian families suggest that cultural adaptations made by practitioners that reduce dosage or eliminate critical core content can increase retention by up to 40%, but reduce positive outcomes. Recommendations include the need for additional research on culturally-sensitive family interventions.

Download full-text


Available from: Paula Smith, May 05, 2015
  • Source
    • "ies in Georgia . In these counties , families live in small towns and communities in which poverty rates are among the highest in the U . S . and unemployment rates are above the national average ( Dalaker , 2001 ) . Recruitment and data collection procedures were developed with input from focus groups of rural African American community members ( Kumpfer et al . , 2002 ; Murry and Brody , 2004 ) , and community liaisons were used to aid in the recruitment and retention of participants . Community liaisons were African American community members selected on the basis of their social contacts and standing in the community . The community liaisons sent a letter to the families and followed up on the lett"
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The current investigation was designed to examine the association of parenting during late childhood and early adolescence, a time of rapid physical development, with biological propensity for inflammation. Based on life course theory, it was hypothesized that parenting during this period of rapid growth and development would be associated with biological outcomes and self-reported health assessed in young adulthood. It was expected that association of parenting with health would be mediated either by effects on methylation of a key inflammatory factor, Tumor necrosis factor (TNF), or else by association with a pro-inflammatory shift in the distribution of mononuclear blood cells. Supporting expectations, in a sample of 398 African American youth residing in rural Georgia, followed from age 11 to age 19, parenting at ages 11-13 was associated with youth reports of better health at age 19. We found that parenting was associated with changes in TNF methylation as well as with changes in cell-type composition. However, whereas methylation of TNF was a significant mediator of the association of parenting with young adult health, variation in mononuclear white blood cell types was not a significant mediator of the association of parenting with young adult health. The current research suggests the potential value of examining the health-related effects of parenting in late childhood and early adolescence. Further examination of protection against pro-inflammatory tendencies conferred by parenting appears warranted.
    Frontiers in Psychology 05/2015; 6. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00676 · 2.80 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Cultural factors that may influence parenting interventions have been examined within countries, especially in the United States (Kumpfer et al., 2002; Reid et al., 2001), but cultural and contextual divergence in intervention effects between countries has received little systematic attention. Cultural norms and values related to parenting and family practices, and political and religious factors, are all likely to influence acceptability and effectiveness of evidence-based interventions (Kumpfer et al., 2008; Lau, 2006; Palinkas et al., 2009; Webster-Stratton, 2009). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There has been rapid global dissemination of parenting interventions, yet little is known about their effectiveness when transported to countries different from where they originated, or about factors influencing success. This is the first systematic attempt to address this issue, focusing on interventions for reducing child behavior problems. Stage 1 identified evidence-based parenting interventions showing robust effects in systematic reviews; Stage 2 identified trials of these interventions in a new country. Systematic review/meta-analysis of transported programs was followed by subgroup analyses by trial- and country-level cultural, resource, and policy factors. We found 17 transported trials of 4 interventions, originating in United States or Australia, tested in 10 countries in 5 regions, (n = 1,558 children). Effects on child behavior were substantial (SMD -.71) in the (14) randomized trials, but nonsignificant in the (3) nonrandomized trials. Subgroup analyses of randomized trials found no association between effect size and participant or intervention factors (e.g., program brand, staffing). Interventions transported to "western" countries showed comparable effects to trials in origin countries; however, effects were stronger when interventions were transported to culturally more distant regions. Effects were higher in countries with survival-focused family/childrearing values than those ranked more individualistic. There were no differences in effects by country-level policy or resource factors. Contrary to common belief, parenting interventions appear to be at least as effective when transported to countries that are more different culturally, and in service provision, than those in which they were developed. Extensive adaptation did not appear necessary for successful transportation.
    Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology 03/2015; DOI:10.1080/15374416.2015.1015134 · 1.92 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Although high-risk families may need the assistance of social services more often, their engagement in these services is typically lower (Bussing et al., 2003). Key principles that support families' engagement are brevity, embedding services in service contexts such as schools or other agencies (Hoagwood & Koretz, 1996; Szapocznik & Kurtines, 1989), providing services in the family's native language (Castro et al., 2004; Kumpfer et al., 2002), and using a collaborative approach (Miller & Rollnick, 2002). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Integration of empirically supported prevention programs into existing community services is a critical step toward effecting sustainable change for the highest-risk members in a community. We examined if the Family Check-Up-known to reduce disruptive behavior problems in young children-can provide a bridge to the use of community treatment services among high-risk indigent families. The study's 731 income-eligible families with a 2-year-old child were screened and randomized to the Family Check-Up (FCU) intervention or a control condition. Families were provided yearly FCUs from age 2 through age 5. Regression analyses on families' service use at child age 7.5 revealed increased service use, compared with that of the control group. Child disruptive behavior and socioeconomic status moderated the effect of the intervention on service use. Families who reported higher levels of disruptive child behavior and lower socioeconomic status showed more service use, suggesting the intervention increased service use among the highest-risk families. Greater use of community services did not mediate the effect of the FCU on reduced oppositional-defiant child behavior. Implications of these findings for the design and ecology of community treatment services in the context of evidence-based practices are discussed.
    Prevention Science 03/2014; 16(3). DOI:10.1007/s11121-014-0479-x · 2.63 Impact Factor
Show more