Validity and reliability of a modified version of the neck disability index.

Department of Physiotherapy, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine (Impact Factor: 1.9). 12/2002; 34(6):284-7. DOI: 10.1080/165019702760390383
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The Neck Disability Index was tested for validity and reliability. Fifty-nine Swedish patients (28 men, 31 women) were included. Twenty patients were in the acute phase after a neck sprain, 19 had chronic neck pain and 20 had no neck pain but had other musculoskeletal symptoms. On 5 occasions, the patients completed the Neck Disability Index, the Disability Rating Index, the MOS 36-item short-form health survey, 2 visual analogue scales, for pain and overall activity and some complementary questions. Levels of sensitivity, test-retest reliability and validity were acceptable. In order to increase specificity, we modified the Neck Disability Index by clarifying that the items only referred to the pain in the neck in 9 of 10 items. Thirty-eight patients (16 men, 22 women) were included in a study of the modified version. Twenty patients with acute neck sprain and 18 with other musculoskeletal symptoms filled out the modified version of the Neck Disability Index, which provided a more specific measure of disability due to neck pain.

1 Bookmark
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Patients with cervical radiculopathy often have neck- and arm pain, neurological changes, activity limitations and difficulties in returning to work. Most patients are not candidates for surgery but are often treated with different conservative approaches and may be sick-listed for long periods. The purpose of the current study is to compare the effectiveness of neck-specific training versus prescribed physical activity.Methods/design: The current protocol is a two armed intervention randomized clinical trial comparing the outcomes of patients receiving neck specific training or prescribed physical activity. A total of 144 patients with cervical radiculopathy will be randomly allocated to either of the two interventions. The interventions will be delivered by experienced physiotherapists and last 14 weeks. The primary outcome variable is neck- and arm pain intensity measured with a Visual Analogue Scale accompanied with secondary outcome measures of impairments and subjective health measurements collected before intervention and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after base-line assessment.
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 08/2014; 15(1):274. · 1.90 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Study Design. Translation and psychometric testing of a questionnaireObjective. To adapt the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ) cross-culturally to Chinese language and to investigate the psychometric properties of the translated Chinese JOACMEQ.Summary of Background Data. The recently developed JOACMEQ is a self-reported questionnaire used to assess the severity of the Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy (CSM). Despite its acceptance in the literature, the JOACMEQ has not been translated and validated for Chinese speaking patients.Methods. Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the original JOACMEQ was performed according to published guidelines. A total of 105 patients with a predominant complain of neck pain which included but not limited to patients with a clinically confirmed CSM were included. Psychometric testing of the responses included construct validity (factor analysis), internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha), test-retest reproducibility (Intra-class correlation coefficient) and concurrent validity (Spearman's rho). The discriminatory power of differentiating those with myelopathy from those without was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and with the optimal cut-off points determined.Results. Construct validity testing revealed a comparable factorial structure of the Chinese JOACMEQ with the original JOACMEQ. The Cronbach's alpha of the Chinese JOACMEQ was 0.88 indicating good internal consistency. Good to excellent test-retest reliability was demonstrated for all five domain scores (ICC range = 0.79-0.90). A significant strong association between the Chinese NDI and the quality of life domain of the Chinese JOACMEQ (Spearman's rho = -0.76, p<0.01) was identified. The upper and lower extremity function domain scores were found to be significant with the area under the ROC curve found to be 0.75 (p = 0.04) and 0.82 (p = 0.02) respectively.Conclusion. The results indicated that the Chinese JOACMEQ successfully retained the psychometric properties of the original JOACMEQ and support the usefulness of the Chinese JOACMEQ as an appropriate supplementary diagnostic and outcome measure for Chinese patients suspected of CSM.
    Spine 04/2014; · 2.45 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this paper, we carried out a randomized controlled clinical trial to explore the effect of 12-words-for-life-nurturing exercise on patients presenting with cervical spondylosis. After exercise intervention, the mean VAS and NDI scores of the patients decreased significantly and the scores of BP, VT, and MH in SF-36 Health Questionnaire were significantly higher. Exercise therapy showed significant effect on relieving pain and improving vitality and mental health. The 12-words-for-life-nurturing exercise may be a potential effective therapy for patients with cervical spondylosis.
    Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine 01/2014; 2014:961418. · 2.18 Impact Factor


Available from