Article

Validity and reliability of a modified version of the neck disability index.

Department of Physiotherapy, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine (Impact Factor: 2.13). 12/2002; 34(6):284-7. DOI: 10.1080/165019702760390383
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The Neck Disability Index was tested for validity and reliability. Fifty-nine Swedish patients (28 men, 31 women) were included. Twenty patients were in the acute phase after a neck sprain, 19 had chronic neck pain and 20 had no neck pain but had other musculoskeletal symptoms. On 5 occasions, the patients completed the Neck Disability Index, the Disability Rating Index, the MOS 36-item short-form health survey, 2 visual analogue scales, for pain and overall activity and some complementary questions. Levels of sensitivity, test-retest reliability and validity were acceptable. In order to increase specificity, we modified the Neck Disability Index by clarifying that the items only referred to the pain in the neck in 9 of 10 items. Thirty-eight patients (16 men, 22 women) were included in a study of the modified version. Twenty patients with acute neck sprain and 18 with other musculoskeletal symptoms filled out the modified version of the Neck Disability Index, which provided a more specific measure of disability due to neck pain.

1 Bookmark
 · 
281 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Study Design. Translation and psychometric testing of a questionnaireObjective. To adapt the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ) cross-culturally to Chinese language and to investigate the psychometric properties of the translated Chinese JOACMEQ.Summary of Background Data. The recently developed JOACMEQ is a self-reported questionnaire used to assess the severity of the Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy (CSM). Despite its acceptance in the literature, the JOACMEQ has not been translated and validated for Chinese speaking patients.Methods. Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the original JOACMEQ was performed according to published guidelines. A total of 105 patients with a predominant complain of neck pain which included but not limited to patients with a clinically confirmed CSM were included. Psychometric testing of the responses included construct validity (factor analysis), internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha), test-retest reproducibility (Intra-class correlation coefficient) and concurrent validity (Spearman's rho). The discriminatory power of differentiating those with myelopathy from those without was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and with the optimal cut-off points determined.Results. Construct validity testing revealed a comparable factorial structure of the Chinese JOACMEQ with the original JOACMEQ. The Cronbach's alpha of the Chinese JOACMEQ was 0.88 indicating good internal consistency. Good to excellent test-retest reliability was demonstrated for all five domain scores (ICC range = 0.79-0.90). A significant strong association between the Chinese NDI and the quality of life domain of the Chinese JOACMEQ (Spearman's rho = -0.76, p<0.01) was identified. The upper and lower extremity function domain scores were found to be significant with the area under the ROC curve found to be 0.75 (p = 0.04) and 0.82 (p = 0.02) respectively.Conclusion. The results indicated that the Chinese JOACMEQ successfully retained the psychometric properties of the original JOACMEQ and support the usefulness of the Chinese JOACMEQ as an appropriate supplementary diagnostic and outcome measure for Chinese patients suspected of CSM.
    Spine 04/2014; · 2.16 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Different types of exercises can help manage chronic neck pain. Supervised exercise interventions are widely used, but these protocols require substantial resources. The aim of this trial, which focused on adherence, was to evaluate two home exercise interventions. This parallel group randomized controlled trial included 57 women randomly allocated into two groups - a strength training group (STRENGTH, 34 subjects) and a stretching group (STRETCH, 23 subjects). The interventions focused on the neck and shoulder muscles and lasted for 12 months. The STRENGTH group performed weight training and ended each session with stretching exercises. These stretching exercises constituted the entirety of the STRETCH group's training session. Both groups were instructed to exercise three times per week. All the participants kept an exercise diary. In addition, all participants were offered support via phone and e-mail. The primary outcomes were pain intensity and function. The trial included a four- to six-month and a twelve-month follow-up. A completer in this study exercised at least 1,5 times per week during eight unbroken weeks. A responder in this study reported clinically significant improvements on pain and function. The statistical analyses used the Mann Whitney U-test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and X2 test. At four- to six-months, the numbers of completers were 19 in the STRENGTH group and 17 in the STRETCH group. At twelve months, the corresponding numbers were 11 (STRENGTH) and 10 (STRETCH). At four- to six-months, the proportions of subjects reporting clinically important changes (STRENGTH and STRETCH) were for neck pain: 47% and 41%, shoulder pain: 47% and 47%, function: 37% and 29%. At twelve months, the corresponding numbers were for neck pain: 45% and 40%, shoulder pain: 55% and 50%, function: 55% and 20%. No differences in the two primary outcomes between the two interventions were found, a finding that may be due to the insufficient statistical power of the study. Both interventions based on home exercises improved the two primary outcomes, but the adherences were relatively low. Future studies should investigate ways to improve adherence to home exercise treatments.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Id: NCT01876680.
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 01/2014; 15(1):6. · 1.88 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Neck Disability Index (NDI) is the most commonly used outcome measure for neck pain. This study aimed to determine the psychometric properties of a German version of the NDI. Cross-cultural translation and psychometric testing of the NDI were performed. The 10-item NDI was translated into German and administered to 558 patients with chronic unspecific neck pain (Mean age 49.9 +/- 11.4 years, 76% female). The factor structure and reliability of the NDI were assessed using factor analysis, Cronbach's alpha, split-half reliability (Spearman-Brown coefficient), and intra-class correlation (ICC2,1). To determine convergent validity, pain intensity (visual analog scale; VAS), pain on movement (VAS), and quality of life (Short Form 36 Health Survey Questionnaire; SF-36) were correlated with the NDI. Correlation with range of motion and sensitivity to change were also assessed in a subsample of 49 patients. The mean NDI score was 32.75 +/- 13.09. Factor analysis revealed a single factor that explained 39.8% of the variance. Cronbach's alpha was 0.81; Spearman-Brown coefficient was 0.80; and intra-class correlation was 0.81 (95% confidence interval = 0.78, 0.83). Significant correlations were found for pain intensity (r = 0.22, p < 0.01), pain on movement (r = 0.39, p < 0.01), quality of life (r = -0.30 to -0.45, p < 0.01), and range of motion (r = -0.34, p = 0.02). Patients who reported global improvement of health after an exercise or yoga intervention showed a higher decrease on the NDI than patients who reported no global improvement (p < 0.01). The German version of the NDI has a comparable factor structure as the original version, acceptable psychometric properties, and is sensitive to change after physical activity. Neck disability is associated with other measures of neck pain.
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 03/2014; 15(1):91. · 1.88 Impact Factor

Full-text

View
14 Downloads
Available from