Comparison of recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and placebo for treatment of septic preterm infants.

Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York City, NY, USA.
The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal (Impact Factor: 3.14). 12/2002; 21(11):1061-5. DOI: 10.1097/01.inf.0000036091.75362.b9
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To reduce morbidity and mortality adjuvant cytokine therapy was administered to septic neonates with variable results. The objective of this case series was to compare the effectiveness of recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (rhuGM-CSF) and recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rG-CSF) with that of placebo in correcting neutropenia induced by sepsis.
Symptomatic, septic premature neonates with or without a positive blood culture were eligible. Twenty-eight patients were randomized: 10 received rG-CSF (5 microg/kg/dose i.v. twice a day); 10 received rhuGM-CSF (4 microg/kg/dose i.v. twice a day) and 8 received placebo for a maximum of 7 days, or until an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) of 10,000 cells/mm was reached.
A significant increase in the ANC above the baseline was present on Day 2 in the rG-CSF group (P = 0.015) and on Day 5 in the rhuGM-CSF (P = 0.002) and placebo (P = 0.027) groups. The ANC of the rG-CSF group was significantly above that in the rhuGM-CSF and placebo groups on Day 7 (P = 0.03). Mortality and neonatal intensive care unit morbidity was not significantly different between the groups.
The neutrophil count in the rG-CSF-treated group increased significantly faster than that in the placebo or rhuGM-CSF group.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Recent steps to prevent neonatal sepsis due to group B Streptococcal infection have lowered the attack rate from this organism, but may not have lowered overall sepsis rates. Mortality from sepsis stills remains between 20 and 40% and is probably so high due to the immunological immaturity of the newborn. Although antibiotics remain the mainstay for treatment, adjunctive therapies aimed at improving the immunological integrity of the neonatal patient have a role in treatment and may improve outcomes. We discuss several adjunctive therapies, along with the physiologic rationale for their use, and discuss an approach for their inclusion in therapy for neonatal sepsis.
    Newborn and Infant Nursing Reviews 03/2004; 4(1):46-50. DOI:10.1053/j.nainr.2003.09.003
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim is to review normal blood neutrophil concentrations and the clinical approach to neutropenia in the neonatal period. A literature search on neonatal neutropenia was performed using the databases PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus, and the electronic archive of abstracts presented at the annual meetings of the Pediatric Academic Societies. The review summarizes current knowledge on the causes of neutropenia in premature and critically ill neonates, focusing on common causes such as maternal hypertension, neonatal sepsis, twin-twin transfusion, alloimmunization, and hemolytic disease. The article provides a rational approach to diagnosis and treatment of neonatal neutropenia, including current evidence on the role of recombinant hematopoietic growth factors. Neutrophil counts should be carefully evaluated in premature and critically ill neonates. Although neutropenia is usually benign and runs a self-limited course in most neonates, it can be prolonged, and it constitutes a serious deficiency in antimicrobial defense in some infants.
    Current opinion in hematology 01/2014; 21(1):43-9. DOI:10.1097/MOH.0000000000000010 · 4.05 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND Hematopoietic growth factors (HGFs) are mostly used as supportive measures to reduce infectious complications associated with neutropenia. Over the past decade, the use of HGFs became a common method for mobilizing human CD34+ stem cells, either for autologous or allogeneic transplantation. However, since their introduction the long-term safety of the procedure has become a major focus of discussion and research. Most information refers to healthy normal donors and data concerning pregnant and lactating women are scarce. The clinical question, which is the core of this review, is whether stem cell donation, preceded by administration of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) for mobilization, is a safe procedure for pregnant donors.METHODS Literature searches were performed in Pubmed for English language articles published before the end of May 2012, focusing on G-CSF administration during pregnancy, lactation and hematopoietic stem cell donation. Searches included animal and human studies.RESULTSData from animals (n = 15 studies) and women (n = 46 studies) indicate that G-CSF crosses the placenta, stimulates fetal granulopoiesis, improves neonatal survival mostly for very immature infants, promotes trophoblast growth and placental metabolism and has an anti-abortive role. Granulocyte macrophage-CSF is a key cytokine in the maternal immune tolerance towards the implanted embryo and exerts protective long-term programming effects to preimplantation embryos. The available data suggest that probably CSFs should not be administered during the time of most active organogenesis (first trimester), except perhaps for the first week during which implantation takes place. Provided CSF is administered during the second and third trimesters, it appears to be safe, and pregnant women receiving the CSF treatment can become hematopoietic stem cell donors. There are also risks related to the anesthesia, which is required for the bone marrow aspiration. During lactation, there should be a period of at least 3 days to allow for clearance of CSF from milk before resuming breast feeding. With regard to teratogenicity or leukaemogenity, in non-pregnant or non-lactating women reports show that CSF administration is associated with a risk for leukemia; however, this risk is not higher compared with the control population.CONCLUSIONS The information available to date indicates that administration of CSF in general, and G-CSF in particular, is safe and healthy pregnant women can serve as donors of either bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cells. However, the clinical experience is rather limited and therefore until more data become available, G-CSF should not be used during pregnancy and lactation when other therapeutic options, instead of stem cell transplantation, are available.
    Human Reproduction Update 01/2013; DOI:10.1093/humupd/dms053 · 8.66 Impact Factor