Online commentary during the physical examination: A communication tool for avoiding inappropriate antibiotic prescribing?

Department of Pediatrics, 12-365 Marion Davies Children's Center, University of California, Los Angeles, 10833 LeConte Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1752, USA.
Social Science & Medicine (Impact Factor: 2.89). 02/2003; 56(2):313-20. DOI: 10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00029-1
Source: PubMed


A previously identified communication behavior, online commentary, is physician talk that describes what he/she is seeing, feeling, or hearing during the physical examination of the patient. The investigators who identified this communication behavior hypothesized that its use may be associated with successful physician resistance to perceived or actual patient expectations for inappropriate antibiotic medication. This paper examines the relationship between actual and perceived parental expectations for antibiotics and physician use of online commentary as well as the relationship between online commentary use and the physician's prescribing decision. We conducted a prospective observational study in two private pediatric practices. Study procedures included a pre-visit parent survey, audiotaping of study consultations, and post-visit surveys of the participating physicians. Ten pediatricians participated (participation rate=77%) and 306 eligible parents participated (participation rate=86%) who were attending sick visits for their children with upper respiratory tract infections between October 1996 and March 1997. The main outcomes measured were the proportion of consultations with online commentary and the proportion of consultations where antibiotics were prescribed. Two primary types of online commentaries were observed: (1) online commentary suggestive of a problematic finding on physical examination that might require antibiotic treatment ('problem' online commentary), e.g., "That cough sounds very chesty"; and (2) online commentary that indicated the physical examination findings were not problematic and antibiotics were probably not necessary ('no problem' online commentary), e.g., "Her throat is only slightly red". For presumed viral cases where the physician thought the parent expected to receive antibiotics, if the physician used at least some 'problem' online commentary, he/she prescribed antibiotics in 91% (10/11) of cases. Conversely, when the physician exclusively employed 'no problem' online commentary, antibiotics were prescribed 27% (4/15) of the time (p = 0.07). Use of 'no problem' online commentary did not add significantly to visit length. 'No problem' online commentary is a communication technique that may provide an effective and efficient method for resisting perceived expectations to prescribe antibiotics.

Download full-text


Available from: John Heritage,
  • Source
    • "The unusual displays of accounting activity, whether in their discussion of test results or physical examination findings, reflect doctors' defensiveness about the messages they are trying to convey, and that, from their own point of view, they are communicating an unwelcome diagnosis. The use of running commentary, stress on normal tests results and the positive evaluation of the patients' symptoms make explicit the grounds on which the upcoming diagnostic conclusion (that the symptoms did not have an organic cause) was reached while concurrently emphasizing the doctors' expertise [26] [27] [37]. Similar behaviours have been described in other difficult medical encounters, for instance when there are mis-alignments between patients' illness theories and doctors' diagnoses in primary care, or when doctors explain the diagnosis to the parents of a child with learning disability [34] [35] [36]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Consultations with patients with functional symptoms can be challenging. This study describes some of the interactional and linguistic resources doctors use when they deliver the diagnosis of a functional disorder and recommend psychological treatment to patients presenting with medically unexplained neurological symptoms. Twenty out-patient consultations between three experienced neurologists and patients with non-epileptic seizures (NES, N=17) or other functional neurological symptoms (FNS, n=3) were recorded and analysed using Conversation Analysis (CA). Encounters were split into activity sequences (1: history-taking; 2: discussion of examination and test results; 3: diagnosis; 4: aetiology; 5: treatment recommendations). The doctors' formulation effort (FE) in each activity sequence was graded (1: little, 2: some, 3: marked FE). The doctors' communication behaviour was characterised by FE and accounting activities. FE increased during the course of the encounters and was most marked when doctors discussed the aetiology of symptoms and made psychological treatment recommendations. However, FE was evident even at the beginning of the encounters, and when patients fully aligned with the doctor. This study provides interactional evidence why doctors may experience these consultations as challenging. While FE and accounting activities were sometimes linked to objective interactional problems (patients' resistance), doctors also seemed to engage in these practices for no clear interactional reasons, suggesting a degree of defensiveness or prior concern about the consultation. The extent of FE and accounting activities may display doctors' interactional distress but may also reflect a degree of delicacy when doctors explain the diagnoses of NES or FNS.
    Journal of psychosomatic research 12/2011; 71(6):377-83. DOI:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2011.09.007 · 2.74 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "We also constructed a model to examine the key predictors of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing. Based on our prior findings regarding the bivariate relationship of online commentary to inappropriate antibiotic prescribing [31], we hypothesized that no problem online would be protective against inappropriate antibiotic prescribing, any problem online would be detrimental, and no online would be neutral. Thus, for this model, any problem online and no online were compared to a reference group of exclusively no problem online. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study investigates the relationship of 'online commentary' (contemporaneous physician comments about physical examination [PE] findings) with (i) parent questioning of the treatment recommendation and (ii) inappropriate antibiotic prescribing. A nested cross-sectional study of 522 encounters motivated by upper respiratory symptoms in 27 California pediatric practices (38 pediatricians). Physicians completed a post-visit survey regarding physical examination findings, diagnosis, treatment, and whether they perceived the parent as expecting an antibiotic. Taped encounters were coded for 'problem' online commentary (PE findings discussed as significant or clearly abnormal) and 'no problem' online commentary (PE findings discussed reassuringly as normal or insignificant). Online commentary during the PE occurred in 71% of visits with viral diagnoses (n=261). Compared to similar cases with 'no problem' online commentary, 'problem' comments were associated with a 13% greater probability of parents questioning a non-antibiotic treatment plan (95% CI 0-26%, p=.05,) and a 27% (95% CI: 2-52%, p<.05) greater probability of an inappropriate antibiotic prescription. With viral illnesses, problematic online comments are associated with more pediatrician-parent conflict over non-antibiotic treatment recommendations. This may increase inappropriate antibiotic prescribing. In viral cases, physicians should consider avoiding the use of problematic online commentary.
    Patient Education and Counseling 03/2010; 81(1):119-25. DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2009.12.005 · 2.20 Impact Factor
  • Source

Show more