Validation of the French version of the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) in juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

Internal Medicine Department, Médecine Interne, Hĵpital Louis Mourier, 178, rue des Renoullers, Colombes, France.
Joint Bone Spine (Impact Factor: 3.22). 10/2002; 69(5):468-81. DOI: 10.1016/S1297-319X(02)00432-3
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To translate, cross-culturally adapt, and validate the functional disability tool Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ), a variant of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA).
The disability index is the mean of the scores on the eight domains of the CHAQ and can range from 0 (no disability) to 3 (maximum disability). The CHAQ was first translated into French and adapted, then validated in a multicenter cross-sectional study in 306 children with JIA (systemic onset, 23%; polyarticular onset, 22%; extended oligoarticular subtype, 25%; and persistent oligoarticular subtype, 30%).
Overall CHAQ scores discriminated between the four JIA subtypes (systemic: 1.1 +/- 0.9; polyarticular: 0.8 +/- 0.7, extended oligoarticular 0.8 +/- 0.7, and persistent oligoarticular: 0.4 +/- 0.5 [P < 0.0001]). Reproducibility evaluated by test-retest at a 7-day interval was excellent (intraclass coefficient, 0.91), as was agreement between the Parent's and Children's versions of the questionnaire (intraclass coefficient, 0.89). Significant correlations were found between the overall CHAO score and variables reflecting disease severity (joint counts, physician's and parent's global assessments, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate), indicating excellent convergent validity of the tool.
The French version of the CHAQ displays good psychometric characteristics, although its sensitivity to change remains to be established. The French version of the CHAO should prove useful in international studies and can be expected to be helpful for monitoring individual patients with JIA.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is a heterogeneous group of diseases, most of which differ from the main adult-onset inflammatory joint diseases. Nonsystemic forms of JIA (oligoarthritis, polyarthritis with or without rheumatoid factors, and spondyloarthropathies) are managed similarly to adult-onset rheumatoid arthritis or spondylarthritis, with a few differences. More specifically, JIA-associated chronic uveitis may require the use of biotherapies that remain experimental in JIA, such as monoclonal antibodies to TNFα or abatacept. International networks have enabled therapeutic trials of medications targeting TNFα alpha, interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6, or T-cell co-stimulation (abatacept). Systemic-onset JIA (also called childhood-onset Still's disease) raises specific treatment challenges and may require treatment with IL-1 antagonists, tocilizumab, or even thalidomide; as a very last resort, intensive immunosuppressant therapy with autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation may be considered. Close monitoring of growth velocity and bone mass accrual is in order, and some patients require additional medications such as growth hormone. Patients with JIA should be managed in specialized centers that have coordinated chains of care for the entire pediatric period and into adulthood. In addition, the use in pediatric patients of recently introduced treatments requires close monitoring for long-term side effects.
    Joint, bone, spine: revue du rhumatisme 10/2010; 77(6):511-6. · 2.25 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this article, scores used to assess the efficacy of treatments in the field of pediatric inflammatory rheumatisms are reviewed. In juvenile arthritis, assessment of treatment efficacy usually refers to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) pediatric score (or Pediatric Rheumatology International Trial Organisation [PRINTO]), which has similarities with the ACR criteria used in adult rheumatoid arthritis. Other validated questionnaires include the child-HAQ. Discussions are ongoing regarding remission criteria for children. These scores are reviewed here.
    Revue du Rhumatisme Monographies 04/2010; 77(2):96-98.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To review the performance characteristics of the instruments most commonly used to measure clinical outcomes in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), including global assessments, articular indices, functional/disability assessments, and quality of life measures. As part of an Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality comparative effectiveness review of antirheumatic drugs, we explored the characteristics of commonly used outcome measures for JIA. English-language studies of children with JIA were identified from Medline and Embase. Two independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts, with subsequent full-text review of studies selected based on predetermined criteria. We included 35 publications describing 34 unique studies and involving 14,831 patients. The Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (C-HAQ) was the most extensively studied instrument and had high reliability, but only moderate correlations with other indices of disease activity and poor responsiveness to change in disease status. The physician global assessment of disease activity (PGA) and articular indices had the strongest association with disease activity and were the most responsive to change. Measures of psychosocial function and quality of life were moderately associated with measures of disease activity, but were less responsive to changes in disease status. In children with JIA, no single instrument was superior in reliability or validity or in describing the impact of JIA. Although the C-HAQ has been extensively evaluated, the PGA and articular indices appear to have the highest responsiveness to change and, therefore, the highest potential for detecting important differences in treatment response.
    Arthritis care & research. 10/2011; 64(4):554-62.