Article

The effects of levonorgestrel on various sperm functions.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Contraception (Impact Factor: 3.09). 01/2003; 66(6):453-7. DOI: 10.1016/S0010-7824(02)00408-0
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Two doses of 750-microg levonorgestrel at 12 h apart is one of the regimens for emergency contraception. The mechanism of action of this regimen is not fully known. We investigated whether levonorgestrel influences sperm functions and thereby, exerts contraceptive activity. The motility, acrosome reaction, zona binding capacity, and oocyte fusion capacity of human spermatozoa treated with 1, 10, and 100 ng/mL levonorgestrel for 3 h were evaluated. Levonorgestrel decreased the curvilinear velocity of the treated spermatozoa in a dose-dependent manner. A significant decrease in straight-line velocity, average path velocity and linearity were also found with 100 ng/mL levonorgestrel treatment. This concentration of levonorgestrel, but not others, also marginally decreased (p = 0.045) the zona binding capacity of the treated spermatozoa. The steroid had no effect on acrosome reaction but had a dose-dependent inhibition on spermatozoa-oocyte fusion. These data show that levonorgestrel affects sperm function only at high concentration and the contribution of these effects to emergency contraception is unlikely to be significant.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
111 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This review summarises the development of emergency contraception (EC) methods, and provides an overview on the currently available options of EC which are effective and safe back-up methods in case of non-use or failure of the regular contraception. The copper intrauterine contraceptive device is currently the most effective method. In most countries, a single dose of levonorgestrel 1.5 mg is the first-line hormonal EC given within 72 h of unprotected intercourse. The oral anti-progestogens such as mifepristone and ulipristal acetate are promising alternatives with better efficacies and a wider treatment window of up to 120 h post coitus, probably resulting from more diverse ancillary mechanisms of actions. Education on EC should be part of any contraceptive counselling. Improving access to EC by providing it over the counter or in advance would not promote its abuse nor encourage risky sexual behaviours, but may further facilitate the timely use so as to achieve the best efficacy.
    Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology. 05/2014;
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: The major contraceptive action of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) is cervical mucus (CM) thickening, which prevents sperm penetration. No study to date has examined the temporal relationship between the insertion of the LNG-IUS and changes in CM quality and sperm penetration. STUDY DESIGN: Participants were enrolled in a clinically descriptive study to compare the quality of CM and three parameters of sperm penetration prior to insertion of the LNG-IUS and on Days 1, 3 and 5 after insertion. Measurements of estradiol, progesterone and levonorgestrel (LNG) in serum and LNG in CM were also carried out at these times. CM was analyzed using the World Health Organization CM grading criteria. Sperm penetration was determined using an in vitro sperm-CM penetration test. RESULTS: All 10 participants underwent LNG-IUS insertion during midcycle when CM quality was good and sperm penetration was excellent. On Day 1 after LNG-IUS insertion, the majority of participants demonstrated poor CM quality and poor sperm penetration. On Day 3, all participants had poor CM quality, and all but one subject had poor sperm penetration. By Day 5, all participants had poor CM quality and poor sperm penetration. LNG levels in CM peaked on the day after LNG-IUS insertion. CONCLUSION: Significant changes in quality of CM and sperm penetration were observed shortly after LNG-IUS insertion; however, CM can remain penetrable for up to 5 days when the LNG-IUS is inserted midcycle.
    Contraception 10/2012; · 3.09 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Human pharmaceuticals are commonly detected in the environment. Concern over these compounds in the environment center around the potential for pharmaceuticals to interfere with the endocrine system of aquatic organisms. The main focus of endocrine disruption research has centered on how estrogenic and androgenic compounds interact with the endocrine system to elicit reproductive effects. Other classes of compounds, such as progestins, have been overlooked. Recently, studies have investigated the potential for synthetic progestins to impair reproduction and growth in aquatic organisms. The present study utilizes the OECD 210 Early-life Stage (ELS) study to investigate the impacts levonorgestrel (LNG), a synthetic progestin, on fathead minnow (FHM) survival and growth. After 28 days post-hatch, survival of larval FHM was impacted at 462ng/L, while growth was significantly reduced at 86.9ng/L. Further analysis was conducted by measuring specific endocrine related mRNA transcript profiles in FHM larvae following the 28 day ELS exposure to LNG. Transcripts of 3β-HSD, 20β-HSD, CYP17, AR, ERα, and FSH were significantly down-regulated following 28d exposure to 16.3ng/L LNG, while exposure to 86.9ng/L significantly down-regulated 3β-HSD, 20β-HSD, CYP19A, and FSH. At 2392ng/L of LNG, a significant down-regulation occurred with CYP19A and ERβ transcripts, while mPRα and mPRβ profiles were significantly induced. No significant changes occurred in 11β-HSD, CYP11A, StAR, LHβ, and VTG mRNA expression following LNG exposure. An ex vivo steroidogenesis assay was conducted with sexually mature female FHM following a 7 day exposure 100ng/L LNG with significant reductions observed in pregnenolone, 17α,20β-dihydroxy-4-pregnen-3-one (17,20-DHP), testosterone, and 11-ketotestosterone. Together these data suggest LNG can negatively impact FHM larval survival and growth, with significant alterations in endocrine related responses.
    Aquatic toxicology (Amsterdam, Netherlands) 01/2014; 148C:152-161. · 3.12 Impact Factor