An evaluation of the use of magnetic field maps to undistort echo-planar images. Neuroimage

MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
NeuroImage (Impact Factor: 6.36). 02/2003; 18(1):127-42. DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2002.1281
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT When a head is placed in an MRI scanner, differences between the magnetic susceptibility of tissue, bone, and air distort the magnetic field. While some of the resulting inhomogeneity can be corrected by the shimming process, much of it cannot, and this causes distortion (sometimes referred to as geometric distortion) of echo-planar images (EPIs). One strategy for the correction of distortion is to acquire a map of the magnetic field achieved in each subject and then to use this to undistort their EPIs after reconstruction (). Here, we present five experiments to evaluate the application of such a strategy on data from a 3-T scanner. We show that after undistortion, the shape of EPIs is more similar to the true shape of the brain, and we investigate the effect of head movement on the efficacy of undistortion. If undistortion was applied first, it was found that less nonlinear warping was required to transform EPIs into a standard space, particularly in the phase-encode direction. We show that if SPM 99 normalization is used to perform a nonlinear warp to standard space, the prior application of undistortion increases the statistical power of group studies with motor and auditory tasks. We show that this increase in power is due to an increase in the overlap of activation of different subjects. Finally, we evaluate where in the brain undistorting EPIs might be expected to have the greatesteffect, in terms both of mislocalization of activationand of a reduction in power. Overall, undistorting EPIs using field maps has proved extremely successful, improving the anatomical localization of activation and increasing statistical power.

Download full-text


Available from: Rhodri Cusack, Aug 23, 2015
  • Source
    • "Estimation of geometric distortion parameters for the realignment and unwarp procedure was conducted using the individual field-maps. Functional time series were realigned, and corrected for field inhomogenities using individual field-maps (Cusack et al., 2003). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: When listening to speech we not only form predictions about what is coming next, but also when something is coming. For example, metric stress may be utilized to predict the next salient speech event (i.e. the next stressed syllable) and in turn facilitate speech comprehension. However, speech comprehension can also be facilitated by semantic context, that is, which content word is likely to appear next. In the current fMRI experiment we investigated (1) the brain networks that underlie metric and semantic predictions by means of prediction errors (2) how semantic processing is influenced by a metrically regular or irregular sentence context, and (3) whether task demands influence both processes. The results are three-fold: First, while metrically incongruent sentences activated a bilateral fronto-striatal network, semantically incongruent trials led to activation of fronto-temporal areas. Second, metrically regular context facilitated speech comprehension in the left-fronto-temporal language network. Third, attention directed to metric or semantic aspects in speech engaged different subcomponents of the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG). The current results suggest that speech comprehension relies on different forms of prediction, and extends known speech comprehension networks to subcortical sensorimotor areas.
    NeuroImage 01/2013; 70. DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.12.013 · 6.36 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "A 3.0 Tesla GE SIGNA Scanner (Milwaukee, WI, USA) with a quadrature birdcage head coil was used to collect anatomical and functional images. Two sagittal GRE field maps were acquired in order to correct warping of the experimental echo planar imaging (EPI) scans around tissue-air interfaces such as the forehead, the brainstem, and the sinuses (Cusack et al., 2003), with the following parameters: repetition time (TR) = 700 ms, echo time (TE)1/TE2 = 7/10 ms, fieldof-view (FOV) = 24 cm, flip angle = 60˚, number of excitations (NEX) = 1, matrix = 256 × 128, 30 sagittal slices of 4.0 mm, and a gap of 1.0 mm. Functional data was collected using a sagittal , T2 * -weighted, blood oxygen-level dependant (BOLD) EPI sequence with the following parameters: TR = "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Research has consistently shown that control is critical to psychological functioning, with perceived lack of control considered to play a crucial role in the manifestation of symptoms in psychiatric disorders. In a model of behavioral control based on non-human animal work, Maier et al. (2006) posited that the presence of control activates areas of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC), which in turn inhibit the normative stress response in the dorsal raphe nucleus and amygdala. To test Maier's model in humans, we investigated the effects of control over potent aversive stimuli by presenting video clips of snakes to 21 snake phobics who were otherwise healthy with no comorbid psychopathologies. Based on prior research documenting that disrupted neural processing during the anticipation of adverse events can be influenced by different forms of cognitive processing such as perceptions of control, analyses focused on the anticipatory activity preceding the videos. We found that phobics exhibited greater vmPFC activity during the anticipation of snake videos when they had control over whether the videos were presented as compared to when they had no control over the presentation of the videos. In addition, observed functional connectivity between the vmPFC and the amygdala is consistent with previous work documenting vmPFC inhibition of the amygdala. Our results provide evidence to support the extension of Maier's model of behavioral control to include anticipatory function in humans.
    Frontiers in Psychology 12/2012; 3:557. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00557 · 2.80 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Preprocessing of the functional images was conducted using SPM8, whereby functional time series of each run were realigned, and corrected for field inhomogeneities using individual field maps [Cusack et al., 2003; Jezzard and Balaban, 1995] (''unwarped''), slice scan time corrected, and spatially filtered using a Gaussian filter with 3 mm FWHM. Applying spatial smoothing prior to the multivariate pattern classification has previously been shown to improve the classification performance [Ethofer et al., 2009]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In language processing, the relative contribution of early sensory and higher cognitive brain areas is still an open issue. A recent controversial hypothesis proposes that sensory cortices show sensitivity to syntactic processes, whereas other studies suggest a wider neural network outside sensory regions. The goal of the current event-related fMRI study is to clarify the contribution of sensory cortices in auditory syntactic processing in a 2 × 2 design. Two-word utterances were presented auditorily and varied both in perceptual markedness (presence or absence of an overt word category marking "-t"), and in grammaticality (syntactically correct or incorrect). A multivariate pattern classification approach was applied to the data, flanked by conventional cognitive subtraction analyses. The combination of methods and the 2 × 2 design revealed a clear picture: The cognitive subtraction analysis found initial syntactic processing signatures in a neural network including the left IFG, the left aSTG, the left superior temporal sulcus (STS), as well as the right STS/STG. Classification of local multivariate patterns indicated the left-hemispheric regions in IFG, aSTG, and STS to be more syntax-specific than the right-hemispheric regions. Importantly, auditory sensory cortices were only sensitive to the overt perceptual marking, but not to the grammaticality, speaking against syntax-inflicted sensory cortex modulations. Instead, our data provide clear evidence for a distinction between regions involved in pure perceptual processes and regions involved in initial syntactic processes.
    Human Brain Mapping 03/2012; 33(3):584-95. DOI:10.1002/hbm.21235 · 6.92 Impact Factor
Show more