Article

External incentives, information technology, and organized processes to improve health care quality for patients with chronic diseases.

Department of Health Studies, The University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Ave, MC 2007, Chicago, Ill 60637, USA.
JAMA The Journal of the American Medical Association (Impact Factor: 30.39). 01/2003; 289(4):434-41.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Organized care management processes (CMPs) can improve health care quality for patients with chronic diseases. The Institute of Medicine of the National Academy of Sciences has called for public and private purchasers of health care to create incentives for physician organizations (POs) to use CMPs and for the government to assist POs in implementing information technology (IT) to facilitate CMP use. Research is lacking about the extent to which POs use CMPs or about the degree to which incentives, IT, or other factors are associated with their use.
To determine the extent to which POs with 20 or more physicians use CMPs and to identify key factors associated with CMP use for 4 chronic diseases (asthma, congestive heart failure, depression, and diabetes).
One thousand five hundred eighty-seven US POs (medical groups and independent practice associations) with 20 or more physicians were identified using 5 large databases. One thousand one hundred four of these POs (70%) agreed to participate in a telephone survey conducted between September 2000 and September 2001. Sixty-four responding POs were excluded because they did not treat any of the 4 diseases, leaving 1040 POs.
Extent of use of CMPs as calculated on the basis of a summary measure, a PO care management index (POCMI; range, 0-6) and factors associated with CMP use.
Physician organizations' mean use of CMPs was 5.1 of a possible 16; 50% used 4 or fewer. External incentives and clinical IT were most strongly associated with CMP use. Controlling for other factors, use of the 2 most strongly associated incentives-public recognition and better contracts for health care quality-was associated with use of 1.3 and 0.7 additional CMPs, respectively (P<.001 and P =.007). Each additional IT capability was associated with 0.37 additional CMPs (P<.001). However, 33% of POs reported no external incentives and 50% reported no clinical IT capability.
The use of CMPs varies greatly among POs, but it is low on average. Government and private purchasers of health care may increase CMP use by providing external incentives for improvement of health care quality to POs and by assisting them in improving their clinical IT capability.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Helen Halpin, Aug 20, 2015
1 Follower
 · 
113 Views
  • Source
    • "at UNIV CALIFORNIA BERKELEY LIB on July 27, 2015 mcr.sagepub.com Downloaded from & Olsen, 1972; Cyert & March, 1963) to draw on to take strategic action, to invest in new initiatives (Casalino et al., 2003; Rittenhouse et al., 2011; Robinson et al., 2009; Thompson, 1967), and to buffer against downside risk. Larger ACOs also care for a greater number of patients, making it worthwhile to invest in the changes needed to promote greater PAE. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Accountable care organizations (ACOs) have incentives to meet quality and cost targets to share in any resulting savings. Achieving these goals will require ACOs to engage more actively with patients and their families. The extent to which ACOs do so is currently unknown. Using mixed methods, including a national survey, phone interviews, and site-visits, we examine the extent to which ACOs actively engage patients and their families, explore challenges involved, and consider approaches for dealing with those challenges. Results indicate that greater ACO use of patient activation and engagement (PAE) activities at the point-of-care may be related to positive perceptions among ACO leaders of the impact of PAE investments on ACO costs, quality, and outcomes of care. We identify a number of important practices associated with greater PAE, including high-level leadership commitment, goal-setting supported by adequate resources, extensive provider training, use of interdisciplinary care teams, and frequent monitoring and reporting on progress. © The Author(s) 2015.
    Medical Care Research and Review 06/2015; DOI:10.1177/1077558715588874 · 2.57 Impact Factor
    • "Despite the $2.6 trillion of expenditure , the quality and efficiency of the U.S. healthcare system ranked last when compared to Britain, Canada, Germany, the Netherlands, Australia, and New Zealand (Davis et al. 2010). As a result, a concerted national effort to reform healthcare using information technologies with a focus on reducing costs and increasing quality of service is well under way (Menon et al. 2000, Casalino et al. 2003, Aron et al. 2011, Buntin et al. 2011). The recently enacted Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH) requires all medical records to be in standardized digital forms by 2014 (Blumenthal and Tavenner 2010). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Health Information Exchanges (HIE) are becoming integral parts of the national healthcare reform efforts, chiefly because of their potential impact on cost reduction and quality enhancement in healthcare services. However, the potential of an HIE platform can only be realized when its multiple constituent users actively participate in using its variety of services. In this research, we model HIE systems as multisided platforms that incorporate self-service technologies whose value to the users depends on both user-specific and network-specific factors. We develop a model of adoption, use, and involvement of clinical practices in the coproduction of the HIE services. This model is grounded in social network theory, service operations theory, and institutional isomorphism theory. A longitudinal study of actual adoption and use behaviors of 2,054 physicians within 430 community medical practices in Western New York over a three-year period has been carried out to evaluate the proposed model. This study has been supported by HEALTHeLINK, the Regional Health Information Organization of Western New York, which has an extensive database comprising over half a million transactions on patient records by the HIE users. We extracted panel data on adoption, use, and service coproduction behaviors from this database and carried out a detailed analysis using metrics derived from the foundational theories. Positioning practices within two distinct but interrelated networks of patients and practitioners, we show that adoption, use, and service coproduction behaviors are influenced by the topographies of the two networks, isomorphic effects of large practices on the smaller ones, and practice labor inputs in HIE use. Our findings provide a comprehensive view of the drivers of HIE adoption and use at the level of medical practices. These results have implications for marketing and revenue management of HIE platforms, as well as public health and national/regional healthcare policy making.
    Information Systems Research 03/2015; 26(1):1-18. DOI:10.1287/isre.2014.0547 · 2.15 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Clinical reminders for depression care Yes; No; Don't know Casalino 2003 [32] Formal screening method for depression Yes; No; Don't know Casalino 2003 [32] Information technology infrastructure Use of electronic medical record Yes; No Casalino 2003 [32] Registry for depressed patients Yes; No Casalino 2003 [32] Performance incentives Types of financial and non-financial incentives used in general and for depression care "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Evidence-based quality improvement models for depression have not been fully implemented in routine primary care settings. To date, few studies have examined the organizational factors associated with depression management in real-world primary care practice. To successfully implement quality improvement models for depression, there must be a better understanding of the relevant organizational structure and processes of the primary care setting. The objective of this study is to describe these organizational features of routine primary care practice, and the organization of depression care, using survey questions derived from an evidence-based framework. We used this framework to implement a survey of 27 practices comprised of 49 unique offices within a large primary care practice network in western Pennsylvania. Survey questions addressed practice structure (e.g., human resources, leadership, information technology (IT) infrastructure, and external incentives) and process features (e.g., staff performance, degree of integrated depression care, and IT performance). The results of our survey demonstrated substantial variation across the practice network of organizational factors pertinent to implementation of evidence-based depression management. Notably, quality improvement capability and IT infrastructure were widespread, but specific application to depression care differed between practices, as did coordination and communication tasks surrounding depression treatment. The primary care practices in the network that we surveyed are at differing stages in their organization and implementation of evidence-based depression management. Practical surveys such as this may serve to better direct implementation of these quality improvement strategies for depression by improving understanding of the organizational barriers and facilitators that exist within both practices and practice networks. In addition, survey information can inform efforts of individual primary care practices in customizing intervention strategies to improve depression management.
    Implementation Science 12/2009; 4:84. DOI:10.1186/1748-5908-4-84 · 3.47 Impact Factor
Show more