Article

External incentives, information technology, and organized processes to improve health care quality for patients with chronic diseases.

Department of Health Studies, The University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Ave, MC 2007, Chicago, Ill 60637, USA.
JAMA The Journal of the American Medical Association (Impact Factor: 30.39). 01/2003; 289(4):434-41.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Organized care management processes (CMPs) can improve health care quality for patients with chronic diseases. The Institute of Medicine of the National Academy of Sciences has called for public and private purchasers of health care to create incentives for physician organizations (POs) to use CMPs and for the government to assist POs in implementing information technology (IT) to facilitate CMP use. Research is lacking about the extent to which POs use CMPs or about the degree to which incentives, IT, or other factors are associated with their use.
To determine the extent to which POs with 20 or more physicians use CMPs and to identify key factors associated with CMP use for 4 chronic diseases (asthma, congestive heart failure, depression, and diabetes).
One thousand five hundred eighty-seven US POs (medical groups and independent practice associations) with 20 or more physicians were identified using 5 large databases. One thousand one hundred four of these POs (70%) agreed to participate in a telephone survey conducted between September 2000 and September 2001. Sixty-four responding POs were excluded because they did not treat any of the 4 diseases, leaving 1040 POs.
Extent of use of CMPs as calculated on the basis of a summary measure, a PO care management index (POCMI; range, 0-6) and factors associated with CMP use.
Physician organizations' mean use of CMPs was 5.1 of a possible 16; 50% used 4 or fewer. External incentives and clinical IT were most strongly associated with CMP use. Controlling for other factors, use of the 2 most strongly associated incentives-public recognition and better contracts for health care quality-was associated with use of 1.3 and 0.7 additional CMPs, respectively (P<.001 and P =.007). Each additional IT capability was associated with 0.37 additional CMPs (P<.001). However, 33% of POs reported no external incentives and 50% reported no clinical IT capability.
The use of CMPs varies greatly among POs, but it is low on average. Government and private purchasers of health care may increase CMP use by providing external incentives for improvement of health care quality to POs and by assisting them in improving their clinical IT capability.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
91 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Mood disorders represent the most expensive mental disorders for employer-based commercial health plans. Collaborative care models are effective in treating chronic physical and mental illnesses at little to no net healthcare cost, but to date have primarily been implemented by larger healthcare organizations in facility-based models. The majority of practices providing commercially insured care are far too small to implement such models. Health plan-level collaborative care treatment can address this unmet need. The goal of this study is to implement at the national commercial health plan level a collaborative care model to improve outcomes for persons with mood disorders. A randomized controlled trial of a collaborative care model versus usual care will be conducted among beneficiaries of a large national health plan from across the country seen by primary care or behavioral health practices. At discharge 344 patients identified by health plan claims as hospitalized for unipolar depression or bipolar disorder will be randomized to receive collaborative care (patient phone-based self-management support, care management, and guideline dissemination to practices delivered by a plan-level care manager) or usual care from their provider. Primary outcomes are changes in mood symptoms and mental health-related quality of life at 12 months. Secondary outcomes include rehospitalization, receipt of guideline-concordant care, and work productivity. This study will determine whether a collaborative care model for mood disorders delivered at the national health plan level improves outcomes compared to usual care, and will inform a business case for collaborative care models for these settings that can reach patients wherever they receive treatment. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02041962; registered January 3, 2014.
    BMC psychology. 01/2014; 2(1):48.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Health information technology (HIT) has become a significant tool in medical practice, and public and international health. Much has been written about HIT and its implications on policy development in the management, practice, and delivery of health care. To better understand the implications on policy development of HIT, a limited literature search was conducted using key terms and a simple search engine. Twelve peer-reviewed published papers were chosen based on keywords and citation frequency from 2000 to 2012. Twelve papers were reviewed. The implications toward policy formulation based on the search terms and the number of citations the paper had from its initial appearance in the literature are presented. The range of citations is 379 to 2. Citation frequency improves over time and in this case, a low citation number reflects relatively recent publication. HIT is a significant tool in healthcare at all levels. Innovation since 2000 has rapidly outpaced technological innovation prior this decadal review. Policy formulation can be impacted by HIT as well as other innovation. However, the current policy framework is not adept to support the accelerated rate of change. The scholarly publications presented here highlight the impact HIT can have on policy and the need to amend the current policy framework.
    World Medical & Health Policy. 06/2013; 5(2).
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to examine factors associated with the implementation of case management (CM) interventions in primary health care (PHC) and to develop strategies to enhance its adoption by PHC practices.
    Clinical Interventions in Aging 01/2014; 9:915-28. · 1.82 Impact Factor

Preview (2 Sources)

Download
1 Download
Available from