Screening adults for Type 2 Diabetes: A review of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task force

Sheps Center for Health Services Research, 725 Airport Road, CB # 7590, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-2949, USA.
Annals of internal medicine (Impact Factor: 17.81). 03/2003; 138(3):215-29. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-138-3-200302040-00015
Source: PubMed


Type 2 diabetes mellitus is associated with a heavy burden of suffering. Screening for diabetes is controversial.
To examine the evidence that screening and earlier treatment are effective in reducing morbidity and mortality associated with diabetes.
MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, reviews, and experts, all of which addressed key questions about screening.
Studies that provided information about the existence and length of an asymptomatic phase of diabetes; studies that addressed the accuracy and reliability of screening tests; and randomized, controlled trials with health outcomes for various treatment strategies were selected.
Two reviewers abstracted relevant information using standardized abstraction forms and graded articles according to U.S. Preventive Services Task Force criteria.
No randomized, controlled trial of screening for diabetes has been performed. Type 2 diabetes mellitus includes an asymptomatic preclinical phase; the length of this phase is unknown. Screening tests can detect diabetes in its preclinical phase. Over the 10 to 15 years after clinical diagnosis, tight glycemic control probably reduces the risk for blindness and end-stage renal disease, and aggressive control of hypertension, lipid therapy, and aspirin use reduce cardiovascular events. The magnitude of the benefit is larger for cardiovascular risk reduction than for tight glycemic control. The additional benefit of starting these treatments in the preclinical phase, after detection by screening, is uncertain but is probably also greater for cardiovascular risk reduction.
The interventions that are most clearly beneficial during the preclinical phase are those that affect the risk for cardiovascular disease. The magnitude of additional benefit of initiating tight glycemic control during the preclinical phase is uncertain but probably small.

Download full-text


Available from: Katrina Donahue, Sep 02, 2014
  • Source
    • "For the screening alone strategy, the extra time was 0.04 years, which is comparable to the range of 0.02–0.08 reported in the UK and Taiwan [19,20,26]. Consequently, the strategy of screening alone, which results in early monitoring or treatment for diabetes, can improve health [49]. In terms of preventing complications, there is now a broad consensus that the earlier diabetes is detected and treated, the greater the likelihood that complications will be prevented or delayed [27]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The serious consequences of diabetes mellitus, and the subsequent economic burden, call for urgent preventative action in developing countries. This study explores the clinical and economic outcomes of strategies that could potentially prevent diabetes based on Chinese circumstances. It aims to provide indicators for the long-term allocation of healthcare resources for authorities in developing countries. A representative sample of Chinese adults was used to create a simulated population of 20,000 people aged 25 years and above. The hybrid decision tree Markov model was developed to compare the long-term clinical and economic outcomes of four simulated diabetes prevention strategies with a control group, where no prevention applied. These preventive strategies were the following: (i) one-off screening for undiagnosed diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), with lifestyle interventions on diet, (ii) on exercise, (iii) on diet combined exercise (duo-intervention) respectively in those with IGT, and (iv) one-off screening alone. Independent age-specific models were simulated based on diverse incidences of diabetes, mortalities and health utilities. The reported outcomes were the following: the remaining survival years, the quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) per diabetes or IGT subjects, societal costs per simulated subject and the comparisons between preventions and control over 40 years. Sensitivity analyses were performed based on variations of all assumptions, in addition to the performance and the compliance of screening. Compared with the control group, all simulated screening programmes prolonged life expectancy at the initiation ages of 25 and 40 years, postponed the onset of diabetes and increased QALYs at every initiation age. Along with an assumption of six years intervention, prevention programmes were associated with cost-saving compared with the control group, especially in the population aged 25 years. The savings were at least US$2017 per subject, but no statistically significant difference was observed among the intervention strategies within each age groups. The cost savings were reduced when screening was affected by poor performance and noncompliance. Developing countries have few effective strategies to manage the prevention of diabetes. One-off screening for undiagnosed diabetes and IGT, with appropriate lifestyle interventions for those with IGT are cost saving in China, especially in young adults.
    BMC Public Health 08/2013; 13(1):729. DOI:10.1186/1471-2458-13-729 · 2.26 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Because of the effects of obesity on insulin resistance, weight loss is an important therapeutic objective in overweight or obese individuals [14]. Simple attention to lifestyle has been demonstrated to be superior to medications for the prevention and delay of T2D in several studies [15-19]. Furthermore, this approach will have a positive impact on the lipid abnormalities [20]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Insulin is an effective treatment for achieving tight glycemic control and improving clinical outcomes in patients with diabetes. While insulin therapy is required from the onset of diagnosis in type 1 disease, its role in type 2 diabetes requires consideration as to when to initiate and advance therapy. In this article, we review a case study that unfolds over 5 years and discuss the therapeutic decision points, initiation and advancement of insulin regimens, and analyze new data regarding the advantages and disadvantages of tight management of glucose levels.
    Osteopathic Medicine and Primary Care 08/2009; 3:5. DOI:10.1186/1750-4732-3-5
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Nearly one third of diabetes cases in the United States is undiagnosed, with mounting evidence that complications accrue even before clinical diagnosis. We wanted to determine whether persons with undiagnosed diabetes have signs of nephropathy and peripheral neuropathy. We examined the prevalence of positive screening tests for nephropathy and peripheral neuropathy in adults aged > or = 40 years with undiagnosed diabetes using secondary analysis of survey and examination data from the population-based United States National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2002. We defined a positive screening test for nephropathy as a spot urine albumin-creatinine ratio > 30.0 mg/g, representing at least microalbuminuria. We defined > or = 1 insensate area on Semmes-Weinstein monofilament testing as a positive finding for neuropathy. Undiagnosed diabetes was defined as a combination of no history of diagnosed diabetes and a measured fasting glucose > or = 126 mg/dL. We used SUDAAN for chi2 and regression analyses. The prevalence of a positive test when screening for nephropathy among those with undiagnosed diabetes was 26.5% compared with 7.1% in those with no diabetes (chi2, P <.01). After adjusting for age and diagnosed or undiagnosed hypertension, the association of undiagnosed diabetes with nephropathy persisted (odds ratio = 2.35; 95% confidence interval, 1.38-4.01). For peripheral neuropathy, 21.5% with undiagnosed diabetes had positive screening tests compared with 10.1% with no diabetes (chi2, P <.01); however, this effect was not significant after adjustment for age. There was no significant difference in positive screening tests for nephropathy or neuropathy when comparing those with undiagnosed and diagnosed diabetes. A significant proportion of adults with undiagnosed diabetes have signs of nephropathy and peripheral neuropathy. These findings may influence policies about early screening for diabetes.
    The Annals of Family Medicine 09/2006; 4(5):427-32. DOI:10.1370/afm.577 · 5.43 Impact Factor
Show more