Endoscopic, deep mural implantation of Enteryx for the treatment of GERD: 6-month follow-up of a multicenter trial.

Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia, United States
The American Journal of Gastroenterology (Impact Factor: 9.21). 02/2003; 98(2):250-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07291.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This prospective, multicenter, single-arm study evaluated the safety and efficacy of the endoscopic implantation of Enteryx, a biocompatible, non-biodegradable liquid polymer for the treatment of GERD.
Eighty-five patients with heartburn symptoms responsive to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use were enrolled. Inclusion requirements were HRQL score < or = 11 on PPI and > or = 20 off PPI, and 24-hour PH probe with > or = 5% total time at PH < or = 4. Patients with a hiatus hernia > 3 cm, grade 3 or 4 esophagitis, or esophageal motility disorder were excluded. Using a 4-mm needle tipped catheter during standard endoscopy, implants were made in 3-4 quadrants deep into the wall of the cardia. Use of PPI medications, pH-metry, manometry, GERD symptoms, and patient quality of life were assessed over a 6-month follow-up period.
At 6 months, PPI use was eliminated in 74% and reduced by > 50% in 10% of patients. The median HRQL score improved from 24.0 pre-implant (baseline off PPIs) to 4.0 at 6 months (p < 0.001). Mean total esophageal acid exposure time was 9.5% pretherapy and 6.7% at 6 months (p < 0.001). Mean LES length increased from 2.0 cm at baseline to 3.0 cm posttherapy (p = 0.003). There were no clinically serious adverse events. Transient mild-to-moderate chest pain commonly occurred after implantation.
The endoscopic implantation of Enteryx is a safe and effective therapy for eliminating or decreasing the need for PPI medications, improving GERD symptoms and patient quality of life, and decreasing esophageal acid exposure among patients suffering from GERD.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Summary The goals of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) treatment are to control symptoms, heal the injured oesophageal mucosa, and prevent complications. Pharmacological therapy is effective in producing acute symptom relief and mucosal healing, as well as the long-term maintenance of remission. Proton pump inhibitors are the mainstay of GERD therapy. However, the need for daily administration, failure to provide complete symptom relief and costs of these agents may limit their use in some patients, prompting a consideration of alternative treatment strategies. Laparoscopic fundoplication may achieve symptom relief and healing of the oesophagitis in these individuals, but its invasiveness, cost and inherent surgical risks have created an interest in endoscopic therapies for GERD, with several emerging during the past few years. These interventions may either be viewed as an alternative therapy or as ‘bridge’ therapy, with patients still choosing to be treated with acid anti-secretory drugs or fundoplication if the endoscopic procedure fails to provide adequate symptom relief or if symptoms recur. Patient selection is critical for the success of fundoplication as well as endoscopic procedures, with ideal candidates being those with well-established endoscopically documented GERD, abnormal pH monitoring, normal oesophageal motility studies, and who have experienced at least partial symptom relief with proton pump inhibitor therapy. Hiatal hernia is not a contra-indication to fundoplication, while endoscopic intervention is best suited for those with a hiatal hernia of less than 3 cm in length. The long-term efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and impact of endoscopic procedures on extra-oesophageal manifestations of GERD and risk for GERD-related complications has not been determined.
    Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics (Suppl) 02/2004; 19:35-42. DOI:10.1111/j.0953-0673.2004.01837.x
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common condition requiring considerable medical resources. The mainstay of therapy is proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), which are effective at reducing acid reflux. In patients who have refractory acid reflux and esophagitis despite high-dose PPI, or are intolerant of the side effects of PPI therapy, surgical fundoplication is the primary therapy. The risk and cost gap between medical therapy and surgery has resulted in substantial interest in less-invasive endoscopic therapies. In this review, we discuss the underlying physiology of GERD along with the anatomic hurdles that must be overcome to develop an effective antireflux procedure. We also review the current published literature and assess the clinical efficacy of the devices that have been studied or currently are being investigated. Despite promising early studies, many of the devices fall short in high-quality randomized controlled trials. Furthermore, the physiologic aberration resulting in GERD oftentimes is addressed inadequately. Although there is certainly a need for less-invasive, safe, and effective therapy for reflux, therapy will need to withstand the established clinical efficacy of both PPI and surgical fundoplication. At present, we have the luxury of time to wait for such a device to become available.
    Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 04/2014; 12(4):544–554. DOI:10.1016/j.cgh.2013.06.012 · 6.53 Impact Factor