Article

Assessment of specific language impairment in Swedish.

Department of Logopedics and Phoniatrics, Lund University, Lund University Hospital, S-221 85 Lund, Sweden.
Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology (Impact Factor: 0.57). 02/2002; 27(4):146-54. DOI: 10.1080/140154302762493207
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The results from pre-testings of 42 children selected for a cross-linguistic study are discussed to establish the usefulness of the assessment instruments used and whether the children selected are similar to children with specific language impairment (SLI) from other countries. The results from assessments of grammatical production, language comprehension and phonology clearly distinguished children with SLI from age-matched controls, while they differed from language matched controls only on phonological measures. As a group the children with SLI were about 2 years delayed on grammatical production measures and about 1 year on language comprehension. The assessment instruments used thus seem capable of distinguishing children with SLI. The Swedish children selected exhibit the same range of problems as children with SLI selected in other countries.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
46 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose. Digit span and sentence repetition are identified as potential markers for specific language impairment (SLI). We investigated if language learning of bilingual children with suspected language impairment (biSLI) was also influenced and led by memory constraints. Method. In a retrospective study, 19 children with SLI and 25 controls (ages 4;9-5;9), as well as 15 biSLI children and 14 controls (ages 5;1-8;9) were compared with regard to their performance on a digit span and sentence repetition task. Results. Both groups with language impairment (SLI/biSLI) showed reduced performance on both tasks. Sentence repetition predicted language comprehension, and the digit span task predicted grammar abilities of the SLI, biSLI, and their controls. Conclusion. Sentence repetition and short-term memory provide information on language comprehension and grammar abilities in language-impaired mono- and bilingual children and confirm their function as SLI markers.
    Logopedics, phoniatrics, vocology 03/2012;
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract This article focuses on consonant productions by a group of children with cri du chat syndrome (CdCS) and examines how various aspects of these productions contribute to these children's overall intelligibility. Eight children and adolescents with CdCS participated in the study, and the following four questions were addressed: (1) What are the characteristic features of the consonant inventories of the subjects in terms of size and types of consonants; (2) how do the subjects render the consonant phonemes of the target language; (3) to what degree do the subjects produce target-like words; and (4) what is the relationship between consonant production and intelligibility? For the majority of our subjects, we found low proportions of correctly produced consonants, small consonant inventories with several recurrent types of deviant consonants, inaccuracy in realization of target phonemes and variable similarity to target words, all of which may contribute to reduced intelligibility.
    Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 04/2014; · 0.78 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There is little data on whether or not a bilingual upbringing may aggravate specific language problems in children. This study analysed whether there was an interaction of such problems and simultaneous bilingualism. Participants were 5- to 7-year-old children with specific language problems (LANG group, N = 56) or who were typically developing (CONTR group, N = 60). Seventy-three children were Swedish-Finnish bilingual and 43 were Swedish-speaking monolingual. Assessments (in Swedish) included tests of expressive language, comprehension, repetition and verbal memory. Per definition, the LANG group had lower scores than the CONTR group on all language tests. The bilingual group had lower scores than the monolingual group only on a test of body part naming. Importantly, the interaction of group (LANG or CONTR) and bilingualism was not significant on any of the language scores. Simultaneous bilingualism does not aggravate specific language problems but may result in a slower development of vocabulary both in children with and without specific language problems. Considering also advantages, a bilingual upbringing is an option also for children with specific language problems. In assessment, tests of vocabulary may be sensitive to bilingualism, instead tests assessing comprehension, syntax and nonword repetition may provide less biased methods.
    Acta Paediatrica 05/2012; 101(9):946-52. · 1.97 Impact Factor