Differences Between Patient and Staff Perceptions of Aggression in Mental Health Units

School of Psychology, University of Wollongong, City of Greater Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
Psychiatric Services (Impact Factor: 2.41). 04/2003; 54(3):389-93. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.54.3.389
Source: PubMed


This study examined the views of patients and staff involved in incidents of aggression to help understand emotions experienced, perceptions of causes, and recommendations for ways of reducing the frequency of aggression.
A total of 29 staff and 29 patients from four psychiatric inpatient units who were involved in 47 incidents of aggression over a four-month period were interviewed shortly after the incidents.
Significant differences were found between staff and patient perceptions of the causes of aggression and recommendations for reducing it. Many staff members perceived the patient's illness as the cause of the aggression and believed that, to manage aggression, changes in medication were largely indicated. In contrast, patients perceived illness, interpersonal factors, and environmental factors as being almost equally responsible for their aggression, and nearly all patients emphasized the need for improved staff-patient communication and more flexible unit rules in helping reduce aggression. Patients and staff were generally satisfied with the way the aggressive incidents were managed, but more staff than patients had an opportunity to debrief.
Staff and patients had different perceptions of causes of aggression and ways to reduce it. Staff supervision and training should highlight the need for understanding patients' perspectives.

Download full-text


Available from: Brin F S Grenyer,
  • Source
    • "A small number of patients in inpatient mental health facilities are responsible for a disproportionately large number of aggressive incidents (Barlow et al., 2000; Grassi et al., 2006; Kraus and Sheitman, 2004; Lussier et al., 2010; Saverimuttu and Lowe, 2000). Although recent studies have explored factors relating to aggressive acts in inpatient samples (Carr et al., 2008; Cornaggia et al., 2011; Ilkiw-Lavalle and Grenyer, 2003; Ketelsen et al., 2007; Papadopoulos et al., 2012), fewer have comprehensively studied the characteristics of those who are repeatedly aggressive. A handful of older studies have described the demographic, clinical and admission characteristics of repeatedly aggressive mental health patients (Barber et al., 1988; Cheung et al., 1997; Convit et al., 1990; Krakowski and Czobor, 1994; Krakowski et al., 1989a, 1989b; Owen et al., 1998; Saverimuttu and Lowe, 2000); however, few studies have studied the historical risk factors of these patients in comparison with nonaggressive patients. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: A small subgroup of patients is primarily responsible for the large number of aggressive and violent incidents in psychiatric inpatient units. This study aims to identify the developmental, social and interpersonal histories of repeatedly aggressive patients in order to better understand their treatment needs. Methods: A total of 1269 consecutive inpatients were studied over 18 months, identifying 64 who were repeatedly aggressive; 128 non-aggressive patients were randomly matched to the aggressive patients by age, sex and diagnosis. Developmental, social, interpersonal and familial histories were obtained from a chart review. Results: Repeatedly aggressive patients were significantly more likely to have had a history of aggression, physical and sexual abuse, and experienced interpersonal problems and parental divorce. Conclusions: Aggressive patients do not just need short-term skills training, but interventions that target interpersonal and personality disorder deficits associated with their developmental histories.
    Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 01/2013; 47(5). DOI:10.1177/0004867412474106 · 3.41 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Ilkiw- Lavalle and Grenyer (2003) found that interpersonal conflicts, such as poor communication among patients and staff and limitsetting , were two major causes of aggressive incidents. In studies that surveyed aggression from both patients' and staff's perspectives , patients did seek more interpersonal contact from staff as an effective management of aggresssion (Björkdahl, Heilig, Palmstierna, Hansebo, 2007; Duxbury, 2002; Ilkiw-Lavalle & Grenyer, 2003; Jansen et al., 2005; Secker et al., 2004). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Nursing is a demanding and stressful occupation. Nursing staff is required and expected to develop an interpersonal style that conveys concern for mentally ill patients. This study is aimed at investigating whether staff attitudes and behaviours are related to assaults on nurses in psychiatric settings. One hundred, sixty-two nurses working in psychiatric hospitals participated in this descriptive and analytical study. The data were gathered with an Interview Form and The Interpersonal Style Inventory. The statistical analysis shows that nurses who are less social and less tolerant are more exposed to physical assaults from patients, however nurses who are more help-seeking are more exposed to verbal assaults and have a concern of being assaulted. The findings of this research suggest that nurses' interpersonal styles may contribute to aggressive behaviours of patients/relatives.
    Issues in Mental Health Nursing 05/2009; 30(4):252-9. DOI:10.1080/01612840802710464
  • Source
    • "In turn, compromised mental state and functioning may limit probationers' ability to comply with the conditions of probation (e.g., getting to required appointments; abstaining from substance use; Skeem et al., 2003). Indeed, there is evidence that negative treatment alliances and clinicians' limit setting elevate patient's risk of becoming involved in violence (Beauford, McNiel, & Binder, 1997; see also Fagan-Pryor et al., 2003; Ilkiw-Lavalle & Grenyer, 2003). Thus, negative dual-role relationships may compromise probationers' mental state and ability to comply with rules. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Traditional measures of the therapeutic alliance do not capture the dual roles inherent in relationships with involuntary clients. Providers not only care for, but also have control over, involuntary clients. In 2 studies of probationers mandated to psychiatric treatment (n=90; n=322), the authors developed and validated the revised Dual-Role Relationships Inventory (DRI-R). The authors found that (a) relationship quality in mandated treatment involves caring and fairness, trust, and an authoritative (not authoritarian) style, (b) the DRI-R assesses these domains of relationship quality, is internally consistent, and relates in a theoretically coherent pattern with ratings of within-session behavior and with measures of the therapeutic alliance, relationship satisfaction, symptoms, and treatment motivation, and (c) the quality of dual-role relationships predicts future compliance with the rules, as assessed by probation violations and revocation. The DRI-R covaries with multiple domains more strongly than a leading measure of the therapeutic alliance, suggesting that it better captures the nature and effect of relationship quality in mandated treatment.
    Psychological Assessment 01/2008; 19(4):397-410. DOI:10.1037/1040-3590.19.4.397 · 2.99 Impact Factor
Show more