Energy from gasification of solid wastes.

Department of Civil Engineering, University of Salerno, via Ponte Don Melillo, 84084, Fisciano (SA), Italy.
Waste Management (Impact Factor: 3.16). 02/2003; 23(1):1-15. DOI: 10.1016/S0956-053X(02)00149-6
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Gasification technology is by no means new: in the 1850s, most of the city of London was illuminated by "town gas" produced from the gasification of coal. Nowadays, gasification is the main technology for biomass conversion to energy and an attractive alternative for the thermal treatment of solid waste. The number of different uses of gas shows the flexibility of gasification and therefore allows it to be integrated with several industrial processes, as well as power generation systems. The use of a waste-biomass energy production system in a rural community is very interesting too. This paper describes the current state of gasification technology, energy recovery systems, pre-treatments and prospective in syngas use with particular attention to the different process cycles and environmental impacts of solid wastes gasification.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Today, global energy consumers are addicted to fossil fuels such as natural gas, oil and coal. Although it has been anticipated that fossil fuels will be depleted soon, these fuels are still dominant as the primary source of energy in the world. Recently, many efforts have been done to substitute renewable alternative fuels to reduce dependency on fossil fuels. Biomass as one of the earliest energy sources appears to be the most promising renewable energy source due to its numerous resources and its environmentally sound characteristics. Since Malaysia is agriculture based tropical country, many crops such as palm, paddy rice and sugarcane are cultivated in this region. Malaysian palm oil industry generate huge amounts of palm solid residue (PSR) biomass such as empty fruit bunches (EFB), palm fiber, shell, trunks and fronds as byproducts which are capable to be taken into account in the energy mix of the country. In this paper, an overview of the PSR generation from Malaysian palm oil industries and its social and economic effects has been given. Indeed, performance of the direct combustion of PSR in terms of PSR composition, properties, heating value, emissions and its effects on the equipment or the components of the boilers have been reviewed. It has been found that the very high moisture content of PSR of palm industry makes their collection and transportation expensive, therefore energy conversion process could be inefficient and utilization of these materials inside the palm oil mills seems more beneficial.
    Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 07/2014; · 5.63 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Challenges in removal of contaminants, especially tars, from biomass-generated producer gas continue to hinder commercialization efforts in biomass gasification. The objectives of this study were to synthesize catalysts made from biochar, a byproduct of biomass gasification and to evaluate their performance for tar removal. The three catalysts selected for this study were original biochar, activated carbon, and acidic surface activated carbon derived from biochar. Experiments were carried out in a fixed bed tubular catalytic reactor at temperatures of 700 and 800 °C using toluene as a model tar compound to measure effectiveness of the catalysts to remove tar. Steam was supplied to promote reforming reactions of tar. Results showed that all three catalysts were effective in toluene removal with removal efficiency of 69–92%. Activated carbon catalysts resulted in higher toluene removal because of their higher surface area (∼900 m2/g compared to less than 10 m2/g of biochar), larger pore diameter (19 A° compared to 15.5 A° of biochar) and larger pore volume (0.44 cc/g compared to 0.085 cc/g of biochar). An increase in reactor temperature from 700 to 800 °C resulted in 3–10% increase in toluene removal efficiency. Activated carbons had higher toluene removal efficiency compared to biochar catalysts.
    Renewable Energy. 01/2014; 66:346–353.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Waste-to-energy technologies are considered as one of the key waste treatment technologies due to their energy and heat recovery efficiencies from the waste. A number of research studies were accomplished to understand the potential environmental burdens from emerging waste treatment technologies such as pyrolysis–gasification (PG). The aim of this study was to examine the PG of municipal solid waste (MSW) treatment process through a life cycle assessment (LCA) method. The study also includes a comparative LCA model of PG and incineration to identify the potential environmental burdens from the existing (incineration) and emerging (PG) waste treatment technologies. This study focused on ten environmental impact categories under two different scenarios, namely: (a) LCA model of PG and (b) comparative LCA model of PG and incineration. The scenario (a) showed that PG had significant environmental burdens in the aquatic eco-toxicity and the global warming potential impact categories. The comparative scenario (b) of PG and incineration of MSW showed that PG had comparatively lower potential environmental burdens in acidification, eutrophication, and aquatic eco-toxicity. Both LCA models showed that the environmental burdens were mainly caused by the volume of the thermal gas (emissions) produced from these two technologies and the final residue to disposal. Therefore, the results indicate that the efficiency and environmental burdens of the emerging technologies are dependent on the emissions and the production of final residue to the landfill.
    International journal of Environmental Science and Technology 08/2013; 10(5):1029-1038. · 1.84 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 27, 2014