Energy from gasification of solid wastes.

Department of Civil Engineering, University of Salerno, via Ponte Don Melillo, 84084, Fisciano (SA), Italy.
Waste Management (Impact Factor: 3.16). 02/2003; 23(1):1-15. DOI: 10.1016/S0956-053X(02)00149-6
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Gasification technology is by no means new: in the 1850s, most of the city of London was illuminated by "town gas" produced from the gasification of coal. Nowadays, gasification is the main technology for biomass conversion to energy and an attractive alternative for the thermal treatment of solid waste. The number of different uses of gas shows the flexibility of gasification and therefore allows it to be integrated with several industrial processes, as well as power generation systems. The use of a waste-biomass energy production system in a rural community is very interesting too. This paper describes the current state of gasification technology, energy recovery systems, pre-treatments and prospective in syngas use with particular attention to the different process cycles and environmental impacts of solid wastes gasification.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: a b s t r a c t In this study, the environmental impacts were assessed for five municipal solid waste (MSW) treatment processes with energy recovery potential. The life cycle assessment (LCA) tool was used to quantify the environmental impacts. The five processes considered are incineration, gasification, anaerobic digestion, bio-landfills, and composting. In addition, these processes were compared to recycling where applicable. In addition to environmental impacts quantification, the energy production potentials for the five pro-cesses were compared to provide a thorough assessment. To maximize the future applicability of our findings, the analyses were based on the waste treatment technologies as they apply to individual waste streams, but not for a specific MSW mixture at a particular location. Six MSW streams were considered; food, yard, plastic, paper, wood and textile wastes. From an energy recovery viewpoint, it was found that it is best to recycle paper, wood and plastics; to anaerobically digest food and yard wastes; and to incinerate textile waste. On the other hand, the level of environmental impact for each process depends on the considered impact category. Generally, anaerobic digestion and gasification were found to perform better environmentally than the other processes, while composting had the least environmental benefit.
    Journal of Cleaner Production 07/2013; in Press. · 3.59 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Today, global energy consumers are addicted to fossil fuels such as natural gas, oil and coal. Although it has been anticipated that fossil fuels will be depleted soon, these fuels are still dominant as the primary source of energy in the world. Recently, many efforts have been done to substitute renewable alternative fuels to reduce dependency on fossil fuels. Biomass as one of the earliest energy sources appears to be the most promising renewable energy source due to its numerous resources and its environmentally sound characteristics. Since Malaysia is agriculture based tropical country, many crops such as palm, paddy rice and sugarcane are cultivated in this region. Malaysian palm oil industry generate huge amounts of palm solid residue (PSR) biomass such as empty fruit bunches (EFB), palm fiber, shell, trunks and fronds as byproducts which are capable to be taken into account in the energy mix of the country. In this paper, an overview of the PSR generation from Malaysian palm oil industries and its social and economic effects has been given. Indeed, performance of the direct combustion of PSR in terms of PSR composition, properties, heating value, emissions and its effects on the equipment or the components of the boilers have been reviewed. It has been found that the very high moisture content of PSR of palm industry makes their collection and transportation expensive, therefore energy conversion process could be inefficient and utilization of these materials inside the palm oil mills seems more beneficial.
    Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 07/2014; · 5.63 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In design of anaerobic bioreactor, rate equation is commonly used. Mathematical model was developed at steady state condition, to project concentration of gaseous substrate and product in biological oxidation of carbon monoxide with water to produce hydrogen and carbon dioxide. The concept of bioconversion was based on transport of CO from gas phase to liquid phase, as the CO consumption was instantaneous and the moles of CO in liquid phase was oxidized to CO 2 ,and H 2 was liberated from water. The moles of produced H 2 were identical to the moles of CO transported to the fermentation media. The data was experimentally obtained in a continuous stirred tank bioreactor. A photosynthetic bacterium, Rhodospirillum rubrum, was used as biocatalyst to facilitate the oxidization of carbon monoxides via water-gas shift reaction. The rate of CO consumption and hydrogen production were projected based on dynamic model at steady state condition. The experimental data were fitted to a few rate models and the best suitable dynamic model for hydrogen production was obtained. The model was used for scale up calculation and dependency of the rate equation and the model to a few process variables were analyzed. The liquid phase medium was supplied for microbial growth with initial concentration of 4 l g / . The media flow rate to the reactor space time (F/V L) was 0.2 h -1 . At the steady state condition, the concentration of acetate was independent of the dilution rate and it was approximated about 1.5 l g / .

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 27, 2014