Article

Bipolar hemiarthroplasty for chronic rotator cuff tear arthropathy.

Department of Orthopaedic Sugery, Division of Hand and Upper Extremity Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA.
The Journal of Arthroplasty (Impact Factor: 2.11). 03/2003; 18(2):169-73. DOI: 10.1054/arth.2003.50041
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Massive rotator cuff tears associated with glenohumeral arthritis are currently an unsolvable clinical entity. We review our series of 14 patients with rotator cuff tear arthropathy (RCTA) who underwent a bipolar prosthesis of the shoulder. The average follow up was 27.8 months (range, 24-48 months), and the average age was 71 years (range, 57-84 years). Of these 14 patients, 9 were men and 5 women. None of these patients had undergone previous shoulder surgery, and all patients underwent conservative treatment that failed to improve their symptoms or range of motion. Preoperatively, the average active forward flexion was 30 degrees, active external rotation was 10 degrees, and the American Shoulder and Elbow Society (ASES) score was 25 points. Postoperatively, the average active forward flexion improved to 88 degrees, active external rotation increased to 37 degrees, and the ASES score improved to 80 points. Of the 14 patients, 12 stated that they had no pain with activities of daily living. Two patients continued to have moderate pain in everyday activity.

1 Bookmark
 · 
91 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This numerical study assesses the influence of an oversized humeral hemiprosthesis with a larger medial offset on the mechanics of the shoulder with cuff tear arthropathy (CTA). Shoulder elevation in the scapular plane is performed, and a Seebauer Type IIa CTA is simulated: a massive rotator cuff tear, a proximal and static migration of the humeral head, and two contacts with friction (glenohumeral and acromiohumeral). The CTA model without a prosthesis (friction coefficient 0.3) is evaluated first as a reference model. Then, three humeral head prosthetic geometries (friction coefficient 0.15) are evaluated: anatomical head, oversized head, and oversized head with a large medial offset. The function of the middle deltoid (i.e. moment arm, applied force, and strength), the contact forces, and the range of motion are studied. The anatomical head, which reduces friction by half, decreases the middle deltoid force (25%) and the contact forces (glenoid 7%; acromion 25%), and increases the range of motion from 41 to 54°. The oversized head increases the moment arm (15%) and the middle deltoid strength (13%), which further decreases the deltoid force (7%) and the contact forces (glenoid 7%; acromion 17%), and increases the range of motion from 54° to 69°. The oversized head with a large medial offset enhances these effects: the moment arm increases by another 3.1%, the deltoid force decreases by another 5% and the acromiohumeral contact force by another 12%, and the range of motion increases from 69° to 84°. These results suggest that increasing the medial offset and oversizing the hemiprosthetic head improve the function of the deltoid, reduce acromial solicitation, and restore elevation to almost 90°.
    Journal of biomechanics 12/2012; · 2.66 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The management of massive, irreparable rotator cuff tears is challenging. They are associated with persistent defects, weakness, and poor outcomes, and can cause an uncoupling of forces across the glenohumeral joint, with unstable shoulder kinematics. There has been much interest in the development of scaffolds to bridge massive rotator cuff tears. As allograft materials may produce inflammatory responses in the host, there is notable interest in developing synthetic grafts for surgical use. Benefits and limitations of the available synthetic scaffolds for augmentation of rotator cuff tears are reported in the present review.
    Sports medicine and arthroscopy review 12/2011; 19(4):360-5. · 1.16 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Revision shoulder arthroplasty represents a complex and difficult problem for the treating surgeon, with multiple potential complications. In the setting of a well-fixed humeral component, removal can lead to fractures and compromise the outcome of the revision. The current study describes and evaluates the results of a novel vertical humeral osteotomy (VHO) for stem extraction. We hypothesized that the VHO will enable successful stem extraction without perioperative or postoperative fractures. Twenty-seven patients were retrospectively identified who had a VHO for revision shoulder arthroplasty, with 23 patients available for final follow-up. Records and radiographs were reviewed for postoperative complications. Final follow-up was completed with the inclusion of shoulder scores. There were no perioperative or postoperative fractures on clinical examination and radiographic review at an average follow-up of 41 months. Average American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score was 64.7 (contralateral ASES, 76.9), average Simple Shoulder Test was 6.3, and the visual analog score pain average was 1.3. There were no instability events. The glenoid is the more common site for failure in both hemiarthroplasty and total shoulder arthroplasty. This can lead to a difficult revision procedure if the ingrown or cemented humeral stem requires removal. In the current study, we found the VHO was an effective tool for the removal of the humeral prosthesis with no perioperative or postoperative fractures.
    Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery / American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons ... [et al.] 03/2011; 20(8):1248-54. · 1.93 Impact Factor

Full-text

View
1 Download
Available from