Article
Intracorporeal lithotripsy: which modality is best?
Department of Urology, University of Miami School of Medicine, Florida 33101, USA.
Current Opinion in Urology (impact factor:
2.59).
06/2003;
13(3):249-53.
DOI:10.1097/01.mou.0000068753.22370.47
pp.249-53
Source: PubMed
-
Citations (0)
- Cited In (1)
-
Conference Proceeding: In-Vitro Under the Reproducible Conditions Investigation on Ho:YAG Laser Applications for Stone Fragmentation
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Laser assisted lithotripsy is an up-to-date clinical procedure for treatment of patients suffering from ureteral calculi. As different laser systems are clinically available, it is a prerequisite to test their potential for lithotripsy under reproducible experimental conditions. A new Ho:YAG-laser was tested with respect of its laser parameters (energy per pulse, repetition rate, pulse duration, fibre diameter) to laser power transmission through clinical optical fibres, artificial stone fragmentation, fibre burn back and stone repulsion. Laser energy transport through optical fibres resulted in a reduction of the in front of the stone available power in dependency to fibre core diameter and degree of bending. Short laser pulses results in a faster stone fragmentation compared to long laser pulse for both, soft stones and hard stones. Repulsion showed max. pendulum deviation at high energy per pulse, short pulse duration and large fibre core diameter and decrease with a reduction of the energy per pulse and fibre core diameter and elongation of the pulse duration.These investigation shows promising results for clinical application of the Ho:YAG-laser and may built the base for the urologist to choose the optimal laser parameter setting for laser assisted stone fragmentation.TIP TEKNOLOJiLERi ULUSAL KONGRESi (TIPTEkNO'12), Antalya, Turkey; 11/2012
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed.
The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual
current impact factor.
Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence
agreement may be applicable.
Keywords
articles
clinical applications
Clinical evaluation
different energy sources
Different types
disadvantages
flexible endoscopic procedures
fragmentation rates
future developments
intracorporeal lithotripter devices
last year
new lithotripters
pneumatic impactor
pneumatic lithotripter
preferable modality
rigid endoscopes
stone free rate
Ultrasound lithotripters
ureteral stones