Identification of patients with hepatitis C virus infection in New Haven County primary care practices.

Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States
Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology (Impact Factor: 3.19). 05/2003; 36(5):431-5. DOI: 10.1097/00004836-200305000-00015
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Primary care providers (PCPs) must identify persons at risk for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, test them correctly, refer to subspecialists, and use published guidelines. The objectives of this study were to describe HCV practices of New Haven County PCPs.
All 652 PCPs in New Haven County, Connecticut, were surveyed to determine practices related to hepatitis C, including risk factor ascertainment, testing routines, use of published guidelines, and referral practices.
Of 181 eligible respondents, 143 (79%) were internal medicine physicians and 38 (21%) were family practitioners. Eighty-four PCPs (46%) routinely asked about a history of blood transfusion, and 112 (62%) routinely asked about a history of injection drug use (IDU). Most PCPs would test current or past IDU (91% versus 83%, respectively), persons transfused prior to 1992 (79%), health care workers with a history of a needle stick accident (88%), and a child born to an HCV-infected mother (76%). PCPs frequently referred patients with hepatitis C to gastroenterologists. Most PCPs (76%) were familiar with available hepatitis C testing guidelines.
Most PCPs test for HCV infection appropriately, but many do not elicit risk factor histories that could identify such persons. More effective training with emphasis on eliciting a history of pertinent risk factors is needed.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objectives. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has recommended a 1-time HCV test for persons born from 1945 through 1965 to supplement current risk-based screening. We examined indications for testing by birth cohort (before 1945, 1945-1965, and after 1965) among persons with past or current HCV. Methods. Cases had positive HCV laboratory markers reported by 4 surveillance sites (Colorado, Connecticut, Minnesota, and New York) to health departments from 2004 to 2010. Health department staff abstracted demographics and indications for testing from cases' medical records and compiled this information into a surveillance database. Results. Of 110 223 cases of past or current HCV infection reported during 2004-2010, 74 578 (68%) were among persons born during 1945-1965. Testing indications were abstracted for 45 034 (41%) cases; of these, 29 544 (66%) identified at least 1 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-recommended risk factor as a testing indication. Overall, 74% of reported cases were born from 1945 to 1965 or had an injection drug use history. Conclusions. These data support augmenting the current HCV risk-based screening recommendations by screening adults born from 1945 to 1965. (Am J Public Health. Published online ahead of print June 13, 2013: e1-e5. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2013.301211).
    American Journal of Public Health 06/2013; DOI:10.2105/AJPH.2013.301211 · 4.23 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In light of dramatically changing hepatitis C therapeutic landscape, knowledge of the current burden of HCV infection in the general population of the United States is critical. The National Health and Nutrition Examination survey collects nationally representative data on HCV infection in the civilian population of the United States. Data from 2001 to 2010 were combined for this study. HCV testing was completed in 38,025 participants. The prevalence of anti-HCV in the United Sates decreased from 1.9% (95% CI1.5%-2.5%) in 2001-2002 to 1.3% (95% CI 0.9%-1.8%) in 2005-2006, and remained stable up to 2010. About 67% of all infected persons were positive for HCV RNA, indicating 2.3 million people with chronic HCV infection, of whom 68% have genotype 1. Seventy percent of infected persons were born between 1945 and 1965, with prevalence of 3.5% (95% CI 2.2%-4.8%). The stable rate since 2006 is mostly related to prevalent cases and foreign born persons migrating into US. Other important risk factors include less education and low economic status. Race, HIV status, number of sexual partners and blood transfusions are no longer associated with HCV infection. As of 2010, approximately 2.3 million persons were chronically infected with Hepatitis C in the US. Most of those infected are prevalent, rather than incident cases. The prevalence of HCV was on the decline, but has stabilized since 2006. Future studies should explore reasons for no decline in HCV prevalence since 2006.
    Journal of Hepatology 11/2013; 60(4). DOI:10.1016/j.jhep.2013.11.014 · 10.40 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Race, ethnicity and language influence health care delivery and satisfaction with treatment in many disease states including chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. In this review, HCV epidemiology and current standard of care is reviewed. The influence of race, ethnicity and language on screening, work-up and initiation of HCV antiviral treatment is evaluated. Acknowledging that these factors do influence health care quality and taking steps to improve communication (e.g. translated written documents; use of reliable, trained translators in the clinic setting) will facilitate the delivery of an equivalent level of care to all patients living with HCV.
    European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology 01/2010; 21(2):131-6. DOI:10.1097/MEG.0b013e32830b387b · 2.15 Impact Factor


Available from