Article

Dosage of treatment to sexual offenders: are we overprescribing?

Department of Justice Canada, Research and Statistics Division, 284 Wellington St., East Memorial Bidg., 6th Floor, Room 6264, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A OH8.
International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology (Impact Factor: 0.84). 05/2003; 47(2):171-84. DOI: 10.1177/0306624X03251096
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT A sample of 337 offenders who received treatment in a variety of sex offender treatment programs in the Ontario region of Correctional Service Canada between 1993 and 1998 were divided based on the highest intensity sex offender programming that they received (low, moderate, and high). The three groups were compared with reference to a variety of actuarial risk assessment measures, criminogenic factors, and the number and type of treatment programs completed. It was hypothesized that the high-intensity group would have more criminogenic risk factors, higher actuarial scores, and participate in more treatment programs than both the moderate- and low-intensity groups. The results indicate that in general, the hypotheses were supported. Nonetheless, the results suggest that the low-intensity group may be receiving too much sex offender-specific treatment.

1 Bookmark
 · 
195 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The present article includes a response to recent criticisms leveled against an earlier article titled “Dosage of Treatment to Sexual Offenders: AreWe Overprescribing?” In that article, the authors argued that sexual offenders receiving low-intensity sex offender treatment in the Ontario Region of Correctional Service of Canada (CSC) may be receiving too many sex offender treatment programs. Marshall and Yates have argued that the analysis performed in that study was inappropriate and that, based on their re-analysis, the opposite conclusion may be more accurate. The present article discusses some of the assumptionsmade to Marshall and Yates in their article and presents recidivism data for individuals included in the earlier article. As well, the authors discuss additional information regarding treatment in the Ontario Region of CSC. The present article concludes that the points made in the earlier study were justified.
    International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 01/2005; 49(2):225-230. · 0.84 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Nearly 60% of convicted sex offenders serve a term of felony probation or parole. Using data for 917 convicted male sex offenders on probation in 17 states, this study examines the efficacy of community supervision for this population. Offenders’ social demographics and baseline criminality were studied in conjunction with formal and informal social controls to determine their collective deterrent impact. The overall recidivism rate was 16%. However, only 4.5% of offenders committed a new sex crime during probation. Regression analyses indicate that factors readily available to court personnel can accurately predict non-sexual recidivism among sex offenders on probation. However, accurately predicting additional sexual violence proved a more dubious task. The only significant predictor of chronic sex offending was the imposition of a jail term as a condition of probation. Results indicate that under the right set of conditions, probation is the most appropriate criminal sanction for some types of sex offenders.
    Criminal Justice Policy Review 01/2005; 16(2):211-236.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Research into the treatment of sexual offenders with an intellectual disability has increased over the past decade. This research can be used to investigate the efficacy of treatment; however, empirical limitations of the research make generalizations difficult. Marques has provided a framework for examining treatment efficacy that emphasizes the contribution of researchers and clinicians to report treatment outcomes rather than a strict reliance on rigorous empirical investigations, such as controlled outcome research. This review uses Marques’ framework to present an overview about group treatment for sexual offenders with an intellectual disability using nine identified studies. This paper attempts to consolidate our knowledge about specific treatment issues, while demonstrating the varied outcomes that are reported in the literature. In employing this framework, the literature suggests that our knowledge can be substantially improved by research addressing specific areas of treatment.
    Journal of Sexual Aggression 01/2008; 14(2):135-144.