Levinas, justice and health care.

Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Institute of Nursing Science, Nedre Ulleval 9, P.O. Box 1120, NO-0317, Oslo, Norway.
Medicine Health Care and Philosophy (Impact Factor: 0.91). 02/2003; 6(1):25-34. DOI: 10.1023/A:1022534902202
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT In this paper I argue that the metaphysical ethics of Emmanuel Levinas captures some essential moral intuitions that are central to health care. However, there is an ongoing discussion about the relevance of ethical metaphysics for normative ethics and in particular on the question of the relationship between justice and individualized care. In this paper I take part in this debate and I argue that Levinas' idea of an ethics of the Other that guides politics and justice can shed important light on issues that are central to priorities in health care. In fact, the ethics of Levinas in seeking the foundation of normativity itself, captures the ethical core and central values of health care.


Available from: Per Nortvedt, Jun 15, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: El artículo explora el fenómeno del dolor a la luz de las consideraciones éticas de Emmanuel Levinas. Para ello, se exponen algunos postulados fenomenológicos acerca del mundo de la vida; posteriormente, se despliega la propuesta de la conciencia no-intencional vista en relación con el fenómeno del dolor y, finalmente, tanto la tesis del mundo de la vida como la de la conciencia no-intencional sirven como soportes para analizar el fenómeno del dolor clínico. El artículo presenta unas conclusiones que permitirán reflexionar sobre la ética médica frente al dolor, en el mundo de la vida.
    06/2012; 15(1):9-17.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The expository aim of this paper is to map the emotional terrain occupied by friends, enemies and others. The theoretical focus – that is, its explanatory purpose – is to explore two quite distinct matters: the psychological foundations and the moral appraisals of the aversive and associative expression of emotion in human relationships. The emotional spectrum between friends and enemies is dynamic, intense and complex. Toward others, the emotional scale lacks intensity, but over time may eventually exhibit psychological and emotional intensity, as well as ethical complexity. When treating others, we may be moved from non-recognition to caution, curiosity, communication and commerce (in the original Latin sense of ‘moving across, making a journey, negotiating an exchange’). Such newly shared terrain is inescapably open to emotional realignments, estrangement, loss and gain of friends and enemies. Whether emotional relations between individual persons are homologous with the relations between communities or nation-states is a question this paper may provoke, but will not seek to answer. The argument draws primarily upon Aristotle’s analysis of the emotions, and offers an oblique, natural language perspective on experiencing and conceptualising ‘the other’ that sharply differs from feminist and post-colonial theory.
    Australian Political Studies Association, Brisbane, Australia; 07/2008
  • Source