Levinas, justice and healthcare

Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Institute of Nursing Science, Nedre Ulleval 9, P.O. Box 1120, NO-0317, Oslo, Norway.
Medicine Health Care and Philosophy (Impact Factor: 0.91). 02/2003; 6(1):25-34. DOI: 10.1023/A:1022534902202
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT In this paper I argue that the metaphysical ethics of Emmanuel Levinas captures some essential moral intuitions that are central to health care. However, there is an ongoing discussion about the relevance of ethical metaphysics for normative ethics and in particular on the question of the relationship between justice and individualized care. In this paper I take part in this debate and I argue that Levinas' idea of an ethics of the Other that guides politics and justice can shed important light on issues that are central to priorities in health care. In fact, the ethics of Levinas in seeking the foundation of normativity itself, captures the ethical core and central values of health care.

Download full-text


Available from: Per Nortvedt, Sep 28, 2015
91 Reads
  • Source
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: For nursing, the idea of bearing witness is of utmost importance. Nurses are present with persons who experience changes in their health and quality of life and who live intense and profound moments of struggling, questioning, and finding meaning. Nurses are also with persons from moment to moment as their lives unfold, and when joy, serenity, contentment, vulnerability, sadness, fear, and suffering are experienced. In this paper, it is proposed that bearing witness is a moral way of engaging in the nurse-person relationship. Based on Levinas's ethics of the face, it is claimed that bearing witness is enacting one's moral responsibility, which arises from the encounter with the other. Drawing on Parse's human becoming theory, ways of witnessing and bearing witness are defined and discussed. It is suggested that bearing witness is a human-to-human way of being-relating, a mode of human coexistence. Bearing witness is being present and attentive to the truth of another's experiences. Moreover, in this paper, the ways nurses enact their moral agency and bear witness to others placed in their care, or turn away, are explored. Nurses' moral agency is located in the constrained moral space of contemporary health care. Hence, the creation of a moral space, which allows nurses to enact their moral responsibility of bearing witness to other persons' experiences of health and quality of life, is called for. In doing so, it is suggested that the act of bearing witness needs a specific nursing knowledge base and a recognition that being present and being with another is a valuable nursing practice that is utterly meaningful for persons who are living through difficult times.
    Nursing Philosophy 08/2006; 7(3):146-56. DOI:10.1111/j.1466-769X.2006.00271.x · 0.83 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The expository aim of this paper is to map the emotional terrain occupied by friends, enemies and others. The theoretical focus – that is, its explanatory purpose – is to explore two quite distinct matters: the psychological foundations and the moral appraisals of the aversive and associative expression of emotion in human relationships. The emotional spectrum between friends and enemies is dynamic, intense and complex. Toward others, the emotional scale lacks intensity, but over time may eventually exhibit psychological and emotional intensity, as well as ethical complexity. When treating others, we may be moved from non-recognition to caution, curiosity, communication and commerce (in the original Latin sense of ‘moving across, making a journey, negotiating an exchange’). Such newly shared terrain is inescapably open to emotional realignments, estrangement, loss and gain of friends and enemies. Whether emotional relations between individual persons are homologous with the relations between communities or nation-states is a question this paper may provoke, but will not seek to answer. The argument draws primarily upon Aristotle’s analysis of the emotions, and offers an oblique, natural language perspective on experiencing and conceptualising ‘the other’ that sharply differs from feminist and post-colonial theory.
    Australian Political Studies Association, Brisbane, Australia; 07/2008
Show more