Migration and HIV risk behaviors: Puerto Rican drug injectors in New York City and Puerto Rico.

National Development and Research Institutes Inc, 71 West 23rd Street, 8th Floor, New York, NY 10010, USA.
American Journal of Public Health (Impact Factor: 3.93). 06/2003; 93(5):812-6. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.93.5.812
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT We compared injection-related HIV risk behaviors of Puerto Rican current injection drug users (IDUs) living in New York City and in Puerto Rico who also had injected in the other location with those who had not.
We recruited Puerto Rican IDUs in New York City (n = 561) and in Puerto Rico (n = 312). Of the former, 39% were "newcomers," having previously injected in Puerto Rico; of the latter, 14% were "returnees," having previously injected in New York. We compared risk behaviors within each sample between those with and without experience injecting in the other location.
Newcomers reported higher levels of risk behaviors than other New York IDUs. Newcomer status (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 1.62) and homelessness (adjusted OR = 2.52) were significant predictors of "shooting gallery" use; newcomer status also predicted paraphernalia sharing (adjusted OR = 1.67). Returnee status was not related to these variables.
Intervention services are needed that target mobile populations who are coming from an environment of high-risk behavior to one of low-risk behavior.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract Migration and geographic mobility increase risk for HIV infection and may influence engagement in HIV care and adherence to antiretroviral therapy. Our goal is to use the migration-linked communities of Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic, and New York City, New York, to determine the impact of geographic mobility on HIV care engagement and adherence to treatment. In-depth interviews were conducted with HIV+Dominicans receiving antiretroviral therapy, reporting travel or migration in the past 6 months and key informants (n=45). Mobility maps, visual representations of individual migration histories, including lifetime residence(s) and all trips over the past 2 years, were generated for all HIV+ Dominicans. Data from interviews and field observation were iteratively reviewed for themes. Mobility mapping revealed five distinct mobility patterns: travel for care, work-related travel, transnational travel (nuclear family at both sites), frequent long-stay travel, and vacation. Mobility patterns, including distance, duration, and complexity, varied by motivation for travel. There were two dominant barriers to care. First, a fear of HIV-related stigma at the destination led to delays seeking care and poor adherence. Second, longer trips led to treatment interruptions due to limited medication supply (30-day maximum dictated by programs or insurers). There was a notable discordance between what patients and providers perceived as mobility-induced barriers to care and the most common barriers found in the analysis. Interventions to improve HIV care for mobile populations should consider motivation for travel and address structural barriers to engagement in care and adherence.
    AIDS patient care and STDs. 05/2014;
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: PURPOSE: To identify individual- and neighborhood-level correlates of membership within high HIV prevalence drug networks. METHODS: We recruited 378 New York City drug users via respondent-driven sampling (2006-2009). Individual-level characteristics and recruiter-recruit relationships were ascertained and merged with 2000 tract-level U.S. Census data. Descriptive statistics and population average models were used to identify correlates of membership in high HIV prevalence drug networks (>10.54% vs. <10.54% HIV). RESULTS: Individuals in high HIV prevalence drug networks were more likely to be recruited in neighborhoods with greater inequality (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 5.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.40-24.42), higher valued owner-occupied housing (AOR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.14-1.92), and a higher proportion of Latinos (AOR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.19-2.80). They reported more crack use (AOR, 7.23; 95% CI, 2.43-21.55), exchange sex (AOR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.03-3.23), and recent drug treatment enrollment (AOR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.05-2.50) and were less likely to report cocaine use (AOR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.20-0.79) and recent homelessness (AOR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.17-0.57). CONCLUSIONS: The relationship between exchange sex, crack use, and membership within high HIV prevalence drug networks may suggest an ideal HIV risk target population for intervention. Coupling network-based interventions with those adding risk-reduction and HIV testing/care/adherence counseling services to the standard of care in drug treatment programs should be explored in neighborhoods with increased inequality, higher valued owner-occupied housing, and a greater proportion of Latinos.
    Annals of epidemiology 03/2013; · 2.95 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Substance use and HIV are growing problems in the Mexico-U.S. border city of Tijuana, a sex tourism destination situated on a northbound drug trafficking route. In a previous longitudinal study of injection drug users (IDUs), we found that >90% of incident HIV cases occurred within an ‘HIV incidence hotspot,’ consisting of 2.5-blocks. This study examines behavioral, social, and environmental correlates associated with injecting in this HIV hotspot. Methods From 4/06-6/07, IDUs aged ≥18 years were recruited using respondent-driven sampling. Participants underwent antibody testing for HIV and syphilis and interviewer-administered surveys eliciting information on demographics, drug use, sexual behaviors, and socio-environmental influences. Participants were defined as injecting in the hotspot if they most frequently injected within a 3 standard deviational ellipse of the cohort's incident HIV cases. Logistic regression was used to identify individual and structural factors associated with the HIV ‘hotspot’. Results Of 1,031 IDUs, the median age was 36 years; 85% were male; HIV prevalence was 4%. As bivariate analysis indicated different correlates for males and females, models were stratified by sex. Factors independently associated with injecting in the HIV hotspot for male IDUs included homelessness (AOR 1.72; 95%CI 1.14-2.6), greater intra-urban mobility (AOR 3.26; 95% CI 1.67-6.38), deportation (AOR 1.58; 95% CI 1.18-2.12), active syphilis (AOR 3.03; 95%CI 1.63-5.62), needle sharing (AOR 0.57; 95%CI 0.42-0.78), various police interactions, perceived HIV infection risk (AOR 1.52; 95%CI 1.13-2.03), and health insurance status (AOR 0.53; 95%CI 0.33-0.87). For female IDUs, significant factors included sex work (AOR 8.2; 95%CI 2.2-30.59), lifetime syphilis exposure (AOR 2.73; 95%CI 1.08-6.93), injecting inside (AOR 5.26; 95%CI 1.54-17.92), arrests for sterile syringe possession (AOR 4.87; 95%CI 1.56-15.15), prior HIV testing (AOR 2.45; 95%CI 1.04-5.81), and health insurance status (AOR 0.12; 95%CI 0.03-0.59). Conclusion While drug and sex risks were common among IDUs overall, policing practices, STIs, mobility, and lack of healthcare access were correlated with injecting in this HIV transmission hotspot. Although participants in the hotspot were more aware of HIV risks and less likely to report needle sharing, interventions addressing STIs and structural vulnerabilities may be needed to effectively address HIV risk.
    The International journal on drug policy 01/2013; · 2.54 Impact Factor


1 Download
Available from