Community stress, demoralization, and body mass index: evidence for social signal transduction.

Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, USA. <>
Social Science [?] Medicine (Impact Factor: 2.73). 07/2003; 56(12):2467-78. DOI: 10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00282-4
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Quantification of the relationship between community-level chronic stress from neighborhood conditions and individual morale has rarely been reported. In this work, pregnant women were recruited at the prenatal clinics of Harlem Hospital and Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center in the USA, and given an initial questionnaire that included all 27 questions of the Dohrenwend demoralization instrument, as well as questions about household economics and health. An index of chronic community stress (ICCS) was compiled for each of the health areas of the study zone by standardizing and weighting each stressor significantly associated with low birthweight rate and summing the standardized, weighted values. Health areas were divided into ICCS quintiles. The graph of the quintile weighted averages of the index vs. the quintile averages of the demoralization score was an asymmetric inverted 'U' shape that fitted well to a stochastic resonance signal transduction model (adjusted R2=0.73). On average, the women in the worst three quintiles were much heavier than those of the two best quintiles. Women reporting household economic deprivations were significantly more demoralized than the others. Median health area rents were strongly negatively associated with the ICCS. The worst average demoralization score occurred in the middle quintile, a state of coping with both poor community conditions and an economically strained household. Rents bridge community conditions and household economics.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Struening et al.1 demonstrated a widening disparity of low birthweight (LOB) rates among New York City health areas from 1980-1986, clearly a dynamic process. In contrast, the New York City Department of Health reported static citywide LOB rate in 1988-2008.2 Struening et al.1 is extended here at the health district level with mapping and regression analyses. Additionally, birthweight data are reported for babies born in 1998-2001 to a group of African-American and Dominican women in Upper Manhattan. The data reported in this paper indicate that both fetal programming of the mother herself (life course model) and stress during or shortly before pregnancy may play a role in LOB. Current stress may arise from past events. Intergenerational effects, thus, could arise from stresses on the grandmother and their residual impacts on the mother as well as new stresses on the mother as an adult. The average weight of babies born to the Upper Manhattan mothers who were born in 1970-1974 was 3,466 g, with 1.6% below 2,500 g; that of babies of mothers born in 1975-1979, 3,320 g, with 6% below 2,500 g. The latter group was born during the 1975-1979 housing destruction. Intergenerational impacts of that event may be reflected in this elevated rate of LOB. Health district maps of LOB incidence ranges show improvement from 1990-2000 and then deterioration in 2005 and 2008. Bivariate regressions of socioeconomic (SE) factors and LOB incidence showed many strong associations in 1990; but by 2000, the number and strength of these associations declined. In 1990, 2000, and 2008, black segregation was the SE factor most strongly associated with LOB. Black segregation and murder rate explained about 85% of the pattern of 1990 LOB. Regressing the 1970-1980 percent population change against the SE factors showed effects even in 2000. The 1990 murder rate and 1989 percentage of public assistance explained over half the 2008 LOB incidence pattern. The housing destruction of the 1970s continued to influence LOB incidence indirectly in 2008. The ability of community and individual to cope with current stressors may hinge on resilience status, which is shaped by past events and circumstances. The present interacts with the past in many ways. Serial displacement exemplifies this interaction of immense importance to public health.
    Journal of Urban Health 05/2011; 88(3):454-68. · 1.89 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: With the increased understanding of the relationship between stress and disease, the role of stress in explaining persistent disparities in health outcomes has received growing attention. One body of research has focused on allostatic load-the "wear and tear" that results from chronic or excessive activation of the stress response. Other research has looked at the link between stress and health behaviors. In this study, we conducted 7 focus groups with a total of 56 people to understand how people living in Highbridge, South Bronx, New York, a low income community with poor health outcomes, perceive stress and its relationship to health. Focus group participants described a direct causal pathway between stress and poor health as well as an indirect pathway through health behaviors, including uncontrolled eating, sleep deprivation, substance abuse, smoking, violence and aggression, and withdrawal and inactivity. Participants articulated a number of theories about why stress leads to these unhealthy behaviors, including self-medication, adaptive behavior, discounting the future, depletion of willpower, and competing priorities. Their nuanced understanding of the link between stress and health elucidates the mechanisms and pathways by which stress may result in disparities in health outcomes and create challenges in changing health behaviors in poor communities like the South Bronx.
    Journal of Community Health 07/2012; · 1.28 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: What are the social and economic consequences of massive destruction of housing? A case study of the New York City fire epidemic of the 1970s is presented. Decision-makers regarded old neighbourhoods (with low-income families and/or racial minorities) as wastelands and developed policies such as urban renewal and reductions in public services (‘planned shrinkage’) which negatively impacted on the physical and social fabrics. Structural and functional continuity even after a disturbance – ecological resilience – depends on many non-disjunctive ‘loose’ relationships to diffuse these impacts. Systems based on ‘tight’ relationships amplify impacts. Families with resources relocate and reduce the community diversity and the density of loose ties. Low-income families whose homes are destroyed weaken the remaining social networks. The remnant cannot maintain social norms. This displacement leads to two possibilities: many small social networks that do not interact; or one large tight network with low diversity. The former confers pathological resilience; the latter, extreme fragility. Neither enforces social norms or generates political power. Both foster risk behaviours and hamper socialization of youth. Thus, concentrated housing destruction destroys healthy resilience and social control and support. Indirectly, it elevates the mortality rate through increased risk behaviours, high death rates among vulnerable elderly, and infectious and chronic diseases.Quelles sont les conséquences sociales et économiques d'une destruction massive de logements? Il est présenté une étude de cas sur l'épidémie d'incendies des années soixante-dix à New York. Les décisionnaires ont considéré les vieux quartiers (avec leurs familles à faible revenu et/ou leurs minorités raciales) comme des zones à l'abandon et ont développé des politiques telles que la rénovation urbaine et les réductions des services publics («réduction planifiée») qui ont eu des répercussions négatives sur les tissus physiques et sociaux. La continuité structurelle et fonctionnelle, même après une perturbation – la résilience écologique – dépend de nombreuses relations «distendues» non disjonctives permettant de rendre ces répercussions diffuses. Les systèmes basés sur des relations «étroites» amplifient les répercussions. Les familles qui ont les moyens s'installent ailleurs et réduisent la diversité communautaire et la densité des rapports distendus. Les familles à faible revenu dont les habitations sont détruites affaiblissent les tissus sociaux restants. Celles qui restent ne peuvent pas maintenir les normes sociales. Ce déclassement conduit à deux possibilités: de nombreux réseaux sociaux de petite taille qui n'ont pas d'interactions; ou bien un grand réseau aux liens resserrés, mais présentant une faible diversité. Le premier confère une résilience pathologique; le second, une extrême fragilité. Ni l'un, ni l'autre ne renforce les normes sociales, ni ne génère de pouvoir politique. Les deux encouragent les comportements à risque et gênent la socialisation des jeunes. Ainsi, la destruction des habitats concentrés anéantit la résilience saine, ainsi que le contrôle et le soutien sociaux. Indirectement, cela élève le taux de mortalité par l'accroissement des comportements à risque, par l'augmentation des taux de mortalité chez les personnes âgées vulnérables et par les maladies infectieuses et chroniques.Mots clés: stabilité, communautaire, destruction de logements, structure sociale de proximité, réduction planifiée, santé publique, services publics, résilience, vie urbaine, rénovation urbaine
    Building Research and Information 07/2011; 39(4):395-411. · 1.99 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Jun 2, 2014