Article

A Randomized Controlled Trial of an Enhanced Balance Training Program to Improve Mobility and Reduce Falls in Elderly Patients

ICL, Londinium, England, United Kingdom
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (Impact Factor: 4.22). 07/2003; 51(6):847-52. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2389.2003.51268.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To evaluate the effectiveness of an enhanced balance training program in improving mobility and well-being of elderly people with balance problems.
Prospective, single-blind, randomized, controlled trial.
District general hospital.
One hundred ninety-nine patients aged 60 and older with a Berg Balance Scale (BBS) score of less than 45.
Six weeks enhanced balance training consisting of a series of repetitive tasks of increasing difficulty specific to functional balance. The control group received physiotherapy conforming to existing practice in elderly patients with mobility problems.
Ten-meter timed walk test (TWT), BBS, Frenchay Activities Index (FAI), Falls Handicap Inventory (FHI), and European Quality of Life questionnaire (Euroqol) measured at 6, 12, and 24 weeks after intervention.
The mean age +/- standard deviation of subjects was 82.7 +/- 5.6, and baseline characteristics were comparable between the groups. Both groups showed improvements in TWT (intervention: 22.5-16.5 seconds, P =.001; control: 20.5-15.8 seconds, P =.054), BBS (intervention: 33.3-42.7, P =.001; control: 33.4-42.0, P <.0001), FAI (18-21, P =.02 in both groups), FHI score (intervention: 31-17, P =.0001; control: 33-17, P =.0001) and Euroqol score (intervention: 58-65, P =.04; control: 60-65, P =.07). There were no intergroup differences at any time. More patients reported increased confidence in walking indoors (36% vs 28%; P =.04) and outdoors (27% vs 18%; P =.02) in the enhanced balance-training group.
Exercise programs significantly improve balance and mobility in patients with balance problems, independent of strategy. Enhanced balance training may, in addition, improve confidence and quality of life but needs further investigation.

8 Followers
 · 
232 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of the study was to assess the effects of 12-month risk-based multifactorial fall prevention program on postural control of the aged. Five hundred and ninety-one (97%) eligible subjects were randomized into an intervention group (IG) (n=293) and a control group (CG) (n=298). The effects of the program were measured on standing, dynamic, and functional balance. In standing balance, the velocity moment of semi-tandem standing decreased in IG (median change -0.54 mm(2)/s) but increased in CG (+3.84 mm(2)/s) among all women (p=0.011) and among the women aged 65-74 years (-1.65 mm(2)/s and +2.80 mm(2)/s, correspondingly) (p=0.008). In a dynamic test, performance distance tended to decrease in IG (-26.54 mm) and increase in CG (+34.10mm) among all women (p=0.060). The women aged 75 years or over, showed marginally significant differences between the groups as regards changes in performance time (-2.66 s and -0.90 s) (p=0.068) and distance (-92.32 mm and +76.46 mm) (p=0.062) of the dynamic balance test in favor of IG. Men showed no significant differences in the changes between the groups in any balance measures.
    Archives of gerontology and geriatrics 11/2007; 48(1):22-7. DOI:10.1016/j.archger.2007.09.006 · 1.53 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To determine the effectiveness of 8-week group functional balance training classes on balance outcomes in community-dwelling veterans at risk for falls. Pre-test, post-test using retrospective data. VISN 8 Patient Safety Center at James A. Haley Veterans Hospital in Tampa, FL, USA. Fifty one community living veterans with mean age of 78 at risk for falls. Participants received a weekly 1-hour functional balance training class for 8 weeks in a small group setting (4-5 participants). Pre and post intervention measures included Berg Balance Scale, Limits of Stability (LOS) and modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction on Balance (mCTSIB). Eighty four percent of the participants completed 5 or more weekly classes. Peripheral neuropathy was the most common risk factor among the participants. There was a significant improvement in the Berg (p < 0.0001) and Composite Reaction Time (p < 0.0004) after the intervention. An eight week group functional balance training class was safe and effective in improving balance outcomes in a cohort of elderly veterans at risk for falls.
    Clinical Interventions in Aging 02/2007; 2(4):655-60. · 1.82 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To analyse the clinical usefulness and metrological properties of the main techniques and indices used to assess balance disorders. More than 4000 abstracts referenced in MEDLINE and dealing with postural control and postural disorders (wide screening) were reviewed to determine the main postural techniques and indices used in a clinical context. We retained abstracts with a high citation frequency and those with interesting findings. Corresponding key words were identified for a specific search of articles that we analysed. Postural assessment tools can be classified as scales of ordinal items, tests based on metric or chronometric measurement, posturography, and verticality perception. These techniques are complementary, and their association is recommended in a clinical context. Regarding generic tools, the Falls-related Efficacy Scale (FES) and the Activities-specific Balance Confidence scale (ABC scale) would be enhanced if comparatively analysed and reworked to allow for a feasible and reliable assessment of the fear of falling. Despite a wide diffusion in numerous postural fields worldwide, the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and the Functional Reach Test (FRT) do not have the required criteria to remain the gold standards they were in the 1990s. Static posturography should be normalised and yield more reliable indices. The clinical relevance of the subjective assessment of visual, haptic, and postural verticals are questionable, especially to explain postural disability. Regarding specific tools, the Tinetti test (TT) and the Time Up and Go test (TUG) are the most suited to assess postural capacities in very elderly people, in whom the predictive validity of the postural assessment of falls is still modest. In stroke patients, the Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke (PASS), posturography, lateropulsion assessment, and vertically perception are interesting and complementary techniques. Postural assessment relies mainly upon the 5 postural items of the Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) in people with Parkinson disease and upon the Romberg test and posturography in patients with cerebellar or proprioceptive ataxia. Some novel postural scales for patients with multiple sclerosis or spinal cord injury are also emerging. Among numerous tools that contribute to the assessment of postural disorders, only the most recent ones (developed in the last 10 years) have undergone complete validation. It is now crucial to compare these tools, not only in terms of reproducibility and internal consistency, but also overall, in terms of feasibility, responsiveness, and predictive validity for a given population.
    Annales de Réadaptation et de Médecine Physique 08/2005; 48(6):317-35. DOI:10.1016/j.annrmp.2005.04.009