Article

Association of the genetic polymorphism in cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A1 with risk of familial prostate cancer in a Japanese population: a case-control study.

Department of Urology, Gunma University School of Medicine, 3-39-22 Showa-machi, Maebashi-City, Japan.
Cancer Letters (Impact Factor: 4.26). 07/2003; 195(2):177-83. DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3835(03)00182-4
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Association between genetic polymorphisms of CYP1A1 and familial prostate cancer risk was examined by a case-control study of 185 individuals. Although the individual analysis of m1 or m2 genotype of CYP1A1 showed no significant association with prostate cancer risk, the presence of any mutated alleles significantly increased prostate cancer risk in comparison with wild-type genotypes by combination analysis (odds ratio [OR]=2.38; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.72-3.29; P=0.0069). Furthermore, metastatic cancer had a significant association with mutated alleles of m1 and m2. These finding suggested that CYP1A1 polymorphisms has an association with prostate cancer risk, especially with progression of prostate cancer.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
78 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The association between the cytochrome P450 1A1 (CYP1A1) Ile462Val polymorphism and prostate cancer risk remains inconclusive owing to the conflicting findings from previous studies. To get a more precise estimate of the possible association, we performed the present meta-analysis. We searched the PUBMED, EMBASE, and Wanfang databases for the studies which met the inclusion criteria. The pooled odds ratio (OR) with corresponding 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI) was used to estimate the association between CYP1A1 Ile462Val polymorphism and prostate cancer risk. A total of 13 studies with 2,350 cases and 2,992 controls were included in the meta-analysis. The results indicated that there was an obvious association between CYP1A1 Ile462Val polymorphism and increased risk of prostate cancer (for Val versus Ile: OR = 1.27, 95 % CI 1.13-1.43, P < 0.001; for ValVal versus IleIle: OR = 1.51, 95 % CI 1.14-2.01, P = 0.004; for ValVal + ValIle versus IleIle: OR = 1.31, 95 % CI 1.14-1.51, P < 0.001; for ValVal versus IleIle + ValIle: OR = 1.38, 95 % CI 1.05-1.81, P = 0.020). Subgroup analyses by ethnicity suggested that CYP1A1 Ile462Val polymorphism was associated with prostate cancer risk in Asians but not in Caucasians. This meta-analysis suggests that there is an association between CYP1A1 Ile462Val polymorphism and increased risk of prostate cancer. More studies with large sample are needed to further assess the association in Caucasians.
    Tumor Biology 02/2013; · 2.52 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cytochrome P450 1A1 (CYP1A1), an important phase I xenobiotic metabolizing enzyme, is responsible for metabolizing numerous carcinogens, particularly polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. The genetic polymorphism of CYP1A1 at the site of MspI (CYP1A1 MspI) has been implicated in prostate cancer risk, but the results of individual studies remain conflicting and inconclusive. The aim of this meta-analysis was to investigate the association of CYP1A1 MspI polymorphism with prostate cancer risk more precisely. We performed a comprehensive search of the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases from their inception up to September 20, 2012 for relevant publications. The pooled odds ratios with the corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CIs) were calculated to assess the association of CYP1A1 MspI polymorphism with prostate cancer risk. In addition, stratified analyses by ethnicity and sensitivity analyses were conducted for further estimation. Sixteen eligible publications with 6,411 subjects were finally included into the meta-analysis after checking the retrieved papers. Overall, meta-analysis of total studies suggested that individuals carrying the TC genotype and a combined C genotype (CC + TC) were more susceptible to prostate cancer (ORTC vs. TT = 1.33, 95 % CI 1.10-1.61, P OR = 0.004; ORCC+TC vs. TT = 1.27, 95 % CI 1.05-1.55, P OR = 0.016). Stratified analysis of high quality studies also confirmed the significant association (ORTC vs. TT = 1.32, 95 % CI 1.04-1.67, P OR = 0.024; ORCC+TC vs. TT = 1.30, 95 % CI 1.02-1.66, P OR = 0.035). In subgroup analyses by ethnicity, a significant association between the CYP1A1 MspI polymorphism and risk of prostate cancer was found among Asians (ORTC vs. TT = 1.44, 95 % CI 1.20-1.72, P OR < 0.001; ORCC+TC vs. TT = 1.33, 95 % CI 1.12-1.58, P OR = 0.001), but not in Caucasians or mixed populations. The meta-analysis suggests an important role of the CYP1A1 MspI polymorphism in the risk of developing prostate cancer, especially in Asians.
    Molecular Biology Reports 03/2013; · 2.51 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: T3801C is a common polymorphism in CYP1A1, showing differences in its biological functions. Case–control studies have been performed to elucidate the role of T3801C in cancer, although the results are conflicting and heterogeneous. Hence, we performed a meta-analysis to investigate the association between cancer susceptibility and T3801C (55,963 cases and 76,631 controls from 268 studies) polymorphism in different inheritance models. We used odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals to assess the strength of the association. Overall, significantly increased cancer risk was observed in any genetic model (dominant model: odds ratio [OR] = 1.14, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.09–1.19; recessive model: OR = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.12–1.34; CC vs. TT: OR = 1.31, 95% CI = 1.19–1.45; TC vs. TT: OR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.07–1.18; additive model: OR = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.09–1.19) when all eligible studies were pooled into the meta-analysis. In further stratified and sensitivity analyses, the elevated risk remained for subgroups of cervical cancer, head and neck cancer, hepatocellular cancer, leukemia, lung cancer, prostate cancer and breast cancer. In addition, significantly decreased colorectal cancer risk was also observed. In summary, this meta-analysis suggests that the participation of CYP1A1 T3801C is a genetic susceptibility for some cancer types. Moreover, our work also points out the importance of new studies for T3801C association in some cancer types, such as gallbladder cancer, Asians of acute myeloid leukemia, and thyroid cancer, where at least some of the covariates responsible for heterogeneity could be controlled, to obtain a more conclusive understanding about the function of the CYP1A1 T3801C polymorphism in cancer development.
    Gene 01/2014; 534(2):324–344. · 2.20 Impact Factor