Article

RPE, Pain, and Physiological Adjustment to Concentric and Eccentric Contractions

Department of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Southeastern Louisiana University, Hammond 70402, USA.
Medicine &amp Science in Sports &amp Exercise (Impact Factor: 4.46). 07/2003; 35(6):1017-25. DOI: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000069749.13258.4E
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The purpose of the study was to compare perceptual (RPE and pain), cardiac (heart rate), lactate, and endocrine (cortisol) responses with concentric (CON) and eccentric (ECC) resistance exercise protocols using the same absolute workload.
Eight healthy men with resistance-training experience participated in the study. Subjects completed two experimental trials consisting of either CON contractions or ECC contractions at the same absolute workload for each of four exercises: bench press, leg extension, military press, and leg curl. Subjects performed four sets of 12 repetitions at 80% of 10-RM with 90-s rest periods. Blood samples were taken before, immediately after, and 15-min postexercise.
There was a significant trial effect for RPE, with CON exercise eliciting a higher RPE than ECC exercise (6.71 +/- 0.51 and 4.10 +/- 0.27, respectively). A significant trial effect was also demonstrated for pain, with CON exercise producing a higher pain rating than ECC exercise (5.59 +/- 0.41 and 3.23 +/- 0.27, respectively). Significantly higher heart rates and lactates were also demonstrated during the CON trial. For cortisol, a significant interaction was revealed between the pre- and immediate posttrial measures but not an overall trial effect. Correlational analyses revealed a significant relationship between RPE and pain for both trials.
CON exercise elicits greater perceptual (higher RPE and pain rating), cardiac, lactate and cortisol response than ECC exercise at the same absolute workload. Data demonstrate that relative to absolute load, RPE and pain respond to resistance exercise in a similar fashion. Additionally, physiological cues are consistent with these perceptual data.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Edward P Hebert, Aug 23, 2015

Click to see the full-text of:

Article: RPE, Pain, and Physiological Adjustment to Concentric and Eccentric Contractions

5.76 MB

See full-text
1 Follower
 · 
244 Views
  • Source
    • "Hollander et al. [24] "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Resistance exercise has a positive effect on many tissues, including heart, bone, skeletal muscle, and nervous tissue. Eccentric muscle actions offer a unique and a potentially beneficial form of exercise for maintaining and improving health. During resistance exercise, the effects of gravity, and mechanical properties of the sarcomere and connective tissue in skeletal muscle allow a greater muscle load during an eccentric (lengthening) muscle contraction than a concentric (shortening) muscle contraction. Consequently, older patients, patients with muscle or limb movement limitations or injuries, as well as cancer patients may be able to benefit from isolated eccentric muscle actions. There are specific physiological responses to eccentric muscle contractions. This review will describe the effects of different eccentric muscle contraction protocols on endocrine responses that could have positive effects on different tissues and recommend direction for future research. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
    Metabolism: clinical and experimental 10/2014; 64(2). DOI:10.1016/j.metabol.2014.10.024 · 3.61 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Studies also show that RPE increases as a function of the number of repetitions and sets for a given weight (Robertson et al., 2003; Pincivero et al., 2004; Woods et al., 2004). In protocols with eccentric contractions, which used various combinations of loads and repetitions, RPE also increased with the increasing of number of repetitions (Hollander et al., 2003), and this linear increase in line with repetitions increasing (Pincivero et al., 2004). The RPE response during RE is related to the total amount of weight being lifted (i.e. the combination of repetitions and weight). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of the present study was to assess the precision of the OMNI-RES scale to predict energy cost (EC) at low intensity in four resistance exercises (RE). 17 male recreational body builders (age = 26.6 ± 4.9 years; height = 177.7 ± 0.1 cm; body weight = 79.0 ± 11.1 kg and percent body fat = 10.5 ± 4.6%) served as subjects. Initially tests to determine 1RM for four resistance exercises (bench press, half squat, lat pull down and triceps extension) were administered. Subjects also performed resistance exercise at 12, 16, 20, and 24% of 1RM at a rate of 40 bpm until volitional exhaustion. Oxygen uptake (VO2) and rate of perceived exertion (RPE) using the OMNI-RES were obtained during and after all RE. EC was calculated using VO2 and the caloric values of VO2 for non-protein RER. Regression analyses were performed for every RE, using EC as the dependent and RPE as the predictor variable. The triceps extension, lat pull down and bench press, RPE correlated strongly with EC (R > 0.97) and predicted EC with a error of less than 0.2 kcal.min(-1). In conclusion, RPE using the OMNI-RES scale can be considered as an accurate indicator of EC in the bench press, lat pull down and triceps extension performed by recreational bodybuilders, provided lower intensities are used (up to 24% of 1-RM) and provided each set of exercise is performed for the maximal sustainable duration. It would be interesting in future studies to consider having the subjects exercise at low intensities for longer durations than those in the present study.
    Journal of Human Kinetics 09/2011; 29A:75-82. DOI:10.2478/v10078-011-0062-5 · 0.70 Impact Factor
  • Source
Show more