Article

Improving care for minorities: can quality improvement interventions improve care and outcomes for depressed minorities? Results of a randomized, controlled trial.

Department of Psychiatry, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Health Services Research (Impact Factor: 2.49). 05/2003; 38(2):613-30. DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.00136
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Ethnic minority patients often receive poorer quality care and have worse outcomes than white patients, yet practice-based approaches to reduce such disparities have not been identified. We determined whether practice-initiated quality improvement (QI) interventions for depressed primary care patients improve care across ethnic groups and reduce outcome disparities.
The sample consists of 46 primary care practices in 6 U.S. managed care organizations; 181 clinicians; 398 Latinos, 93 African Americans, and 778 white patients with probable depressive disorder. STUDY DEIGN: Matched practices were randomized to usual care or one of two QI programs that trained local experts to educate clinicians; nurses to educate, assess, and follow-up with patients; and psychotherapists to conduct Cognitive Behavioral Therapy. Patients and physicians selected treatments. Interventions featured modest accommodations for minority patients (e.g., translations, cultural training for clinicians).
Multilevel logistic regression analyses assessed intervention effects within and among ethnic groups.
At baseline, all ethnic groups Latino, African American, white) had low to moderate rates of appropriate care and the interventions significantly improved appropriate care at six months (by 8-20 percentage points) within each ethnic group, with no significant difference in response by ethnic group. The interventions significantly decreased the likelihood that Latinos and African Americans would report probable depression at months 6 and 12; the white intervention sample did not differ from controls in reported probable depression at either follow-up. While the intervention significantly improved the rate of employment for whites and not for minorities, precision was low for comparing intervention response on this outcome. It is important to note that minorities remained less likely to have appropriate care and more likely to be depressed than white patients.
Implementation of quality improvement interventions that have modest accommodations for minority patients can improve quality of care for whites and underserved minorities alike, while minorities may be especially likely to benefit clinically. Further research needs to clarify whether employment benefits are limited to whites and if so, whether this represents a difference in opportunities. Quality improvement programs appear to improve quality of care without increasing disparities, and may offer an approach to reduce health disparities.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
81 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To assess a quality improvement disparity reduction intervention and its sustainability. Electronic health records and Quality Index database of Clalit Health Services in Israel (2008-2012). Interrupted time-series with pre-, during, and postintervention disparities measurement between 55 target clinics (serving approximately 400,000 mostly low socioeconomic, minority populations) and all other (126) clinics. Data on a Quality Indicator Disparity Scale (QUIDS-7) of 7 indicators, and on a 61-indicator scale (QUIDS-61). The gap between intervention and nonintervention clinics for QUIDS-7 decreased by 66.7 percent and by 70.4 percent for QUIDS-61. Disparity reduction continued (18.2 percent) during the follow-up period. Quality improvement can achieve significant reduction in disparities in a wide range of clinical domains, which can be sustained over time. © Health Research and Educational Trust.
    Health Services Research 03/2015; DOI:10.1111/1475-6773.12300 · 2.49 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Perinatal mental health problems are common complications of pregnancy that can go undetected and untreated. Research indicated that mental health complications are more prevalent in women from disadvantaged communities, yet women from these communities often experience barriers to accessing treatments and interventions. Untreated depression during pregnancy can lead to poor self-care, increased substance abuse, poor obstetrical outcomes, developmental delay in children, and increased risk of postpartum depression. In this study we investigated the perceived perinatal mental health needs of our participants and they wanted to address their perceived needs.
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 09/2014; 14(1):336. DOI:10.1186/1471-2393-14-336 · 2.15 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose: Depression, one of the most common cancer symptoms, has a profound impact on treatment retention and adherence. As such, there is an increasing need to identify simple, effective, and feasible strategies for retaining cancer patients to depression treatment. This becomes especially important in the context of a large public sector care system, where there are not only patient barriers, but also organizational/institutional barriers to delivery. This study aimed to explore strategies used by intervention trial providers to increase retention to a clinical depression treatment trial (Alleviating Depression among Patients with Cancer [ADAPt-C]), among a cohort of low-income minority cancer patients. Specifically, this study identified viable provider strategies to decrease dropout and increase retention to the depression effectiveness treatment trial. Methods: Grounded theory qualitative methods were used to analyze data from fourteen providers representing the various care roles in a randomized clinical depression treatment trial intervention. Fourteen providers included: six social work therapists, three project recruiters, two patient navigators, one psychiatrist, one project manager, and one project assistant. From May to June, 2008, strategies were elicited through in-depth, semi-structured interviews. Sensitizing concepts from the literature and dropout barriers identified by patients (who were predominately female, Latino, foreign-born, unmarried, unemployed, moderately depressed, less advanced cancer stage diagnosis, and in follow-up cancer treatment) were used to guide interview prompts. Strength of this study involved the use of data triangulation to improve analytic accuracy and rigor. Provider participants received $10 gift card incentives. Results: Of the 242 ADAPt-C patients enrolled in the ADAPt-C intervention, 152 satisfied criteria for adhering to treatment, while 90 patients met criteria for withdrawing or dropping out of treatment. Retention strategies clustered according to trial dropout barriers: 1) Depression treatment barrier strategies included patient satisfaction surveys, efforts to strengthen the therapeutic alliance (e.g., building rapport, early engagement, and active listening), and clinical motivation strategies (e.g., persistence, consistency, outcome-focused counseling, validation, family involvement, and strength identification); 2) Informational barrier strategies included education about the study and psycho-educational strategies; 3) Instrumental barrier strategies included transportation resources, consistent contact, reminder calls, phone communication, and flexibility; 4) Recruitment barrier strategies included birthday greetings and the importance of incentive types; 5) Cultural barrier strategies included patient-provider cultural and language matching; and 6) Systems’ barrier strategies included patient systems navigation strategies and the importance of provider-provider rapport and communication. The important cross-cutting thread which links all of these barrier strategies together involves the importance of mediated communication between providers and patients, and providers and patient systems. Implications: This high rate of study adherence among a hard-to-reach population suggests that socio-culturally grounded strategies can be effective in facilitating depression treatment retention among low-income, minority patients in a public sector oncology care system. Findings indicate that identification of treatment barriers can help generate culturally sensitive strategies that not only inform patient level communication interventions, but also institutional and organizational level communication efforts. This study is important to future development of evidence-based sustainability interventions and real-world mental/ health care.
    The Society for Social Work and Research 2013 Annual Conference; 01/2013

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
10 Downloads
Available from
Jun 1, 2014