Factors associated with ambivalence about bone marrow donation among newly recruited unrelated potential donors.

The Center for Research on Health Care, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA.
Transplantation (Impact Factor: 3.78). 06/2003; 75(9):1517-23. DOI: 10.1097/01.TP.0000060251.40758.98
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Previous research has indicated that feelings of ambivalence about donation are associated with donors' decisions not to donate and with less positive physical and psychosocial outcomes among donors who donated despite feeling ambivalent. The current study examines the prevalence of ambivalence among newly recruited potential bone marrow donors and identifies factors associated with greater ambivalence.
Using a cross-sectional design, questionnaires were mailed to a stratified random sample of individuals newly recruited to the National Marrow Donor Program registry at 71 local donor centers. A total of 426 new recruits (63%) completed and returned the questionnaire.
Bivariate analyses indicated that multiple recruitment experience and donor perception variables were significantly associated with ambivalence. Multivariate analysis revealed that the following eight variables were uniquely associated with higher levels of ambivalence after adjusting for the effects of other key indicators: participating in other volunteer activities, joining at a drive for a specific patient, perceiving the recruitment staff as less informative, being discouraged from joining by others, not having an intrinsic commitment to donate, being encouraged by one's culture or religion to join, believing there are risks to donation, and having a greater number of medical, work, and family concerns about donation.
Potential donors who are motivated by an intrinsic commitment to donate, rather than extrinsic pressure, are less ambivalent about donating. In addition, recruitment staff have a potentially critical role in reducing ambivalence among new recruits by providing information that may allay any unrealistic concerns recruits may have about the medical risks and impact of donation on work and family.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Despite over 20 million unrelated donors being listed worldwide, donor attrition at the confirmatory typing (CT) stage of donor acquisition is a key source of delay. Anthony Nolan undertook a study of CT requests from 2010 to 2011 to identify factors associated with attrition. Of 7541 CT requests, 38.2% were cancelled for donor reasons. Of these, 19.4% were personal, 34.1% medical, 36% no contact, 7.9% emigrated and 2.6% others. African (odds ratio (OR) 2.78, P<0.001), African-Caribbean (OR 3.07, P<0.001), Asian (OR 2.65, P<0.001), Jewish (OR 1.54, P=0.009) and Mediterranean (OR=2.38, P<0.001) donors were more likely not to be available compared to Caucasian donors. Female donors were also more likely not to be available (OR=1.32, P<0.001): primarily due to pregnancy. Older donors were less likely to be available in univariate analysis, but this association was not significant after controlling for other factors. Blood donors and those recruited within the past five years had lower rates of attrition. Accumulation of additional attrition-associated characteristics for a given donor was associated with progressively greater odds of attrition (OR 1.99, 2.52, 3.4 and 5.53, respectively, for 1, 2, 3 and 4 risk factors, P<0.001). Donor registries must develop evidence-driven strategies to recruit and retain the most reliable donors.Bone Marrow Transplantation advance online publication, 13 January 2014; doi:10.1038/bmt.2013.206.
    Bone marrow transplantation 01/2014; · 3.00 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Italian Bone Marrow Donor Register is the institutional organization for management of unrelated hematopoietic stem cell donors. The law requires only a donor's clinical history, but not a psychosocial profile for registration. We have studied the donor's motivation for enlistment on the donor registry and the medical staff's need for this information to interact correctly with the donor. For this purpose we distributed a questionnaire to new donors at the 20 centers in the Lombardy Region over a period of 1 year. The analysis of the responses revealed a prevalence of extrinsic motivations that would not ensure continued registration for donation. Therefore, it is necessary that the donor be well informed and better educated about all aspects of donation, in order to produce a shift to an intrinsic motivation. This objective can be facilitated via professional training of health workers in communication.
    Transplantation Proceedings 05/2011; 43(4):981-4. · 0.95 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Donation of haematopoietic stem cells, either through BM or PBSC collection, is a generally safe procedure for healthy donors although adverse reactions are a definite risk. The invaluable source of donation and its central role in transplantation implies that every effort should be made to alleviate possible difficulties the donor encounters. The physical and psychological reactions to donation have been established for some time, but less is known about the factors that are associated with a poorer donation experience. In this article, we provide an overview of the physical and psychological donation experience and focus attention on demographic, physical and psychological factors that may influence this donation experience. Understanding that toxicity profiles vary with certain donor characteristics is crucial as this knowledge could influence practice in numerous ways including the modification of joining and recruitment policies and the improvement of supportive measures and donor follow-up procedures. Although this review deals with both unrelated and related donors (RDs), there is a relative paucity of regulation of RD care and we call for more attention to this area. Owing to the relative rarity of donation in each country, a global effort to collect donor outcome data is needed.Bone Marrow Transplantation advance online publication, 27 January 2014; doi:10.1038/bmt.2013.227.
    Bone marrow transplantation 01/2014; · 3.00 Impact Factor