Article

Microglandular adenocarcinoma of the uterus mimicking microglandular cervical hyperplasia

Sikl's Department of Pathology, Faculty Hospital, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
Annals of Diagnostic Pathology (Impact Factor: 1.11). 07/2003; 7(3):180-6. DOI: 10.1016/S1092-9134(03)00018-2
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT We present a rare case of microglandular carcinoma of the uterus occurring in 76-year-old woman. The tumor tissue in the curettage specimen showed strong similarity with microglandular hyperplasia of the cervix. Microglandular aggregates of glands with only mild nuclear atypia but without any structures of conventional endometrioid carcinoma were seen. Therefore, a microglandular hyperplasia of the cervix was seriously considered. The following features were helpful in the differential diagnosis: numerous neutrophils and "dirty" amount within glandular lumens; very scarce (but nevertheless present) mitoses; isolated single glands with more endometrioid than endocervical appearance; and strong expression of vimentin, which is unusual for microglandular hyperplasia of the cervix. In the resectate, a conventional well-differentiated endometrioid adenocarcinoma with microinvasion of the myometrium (under 1 mm of depth) was found. Microglandular differentiation has been, however, present in plaque-like proliferation replacing the endometrium and on the surface of conventional adenocarcinoma. Eleven months after the hysterectomy, the patient has no signs of recurrence or metastasis. Our case shows the difficulties in the diagnosis of this lesion and confirms a low aggressiveness that was observed in all 10 cases described to date.

0 Followers
 · 
125 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Microglandular adenocarcinoma is a rare type of endometrium carcinoma and had some potential diagnostic problems with difficulties in discriminating from some malign and benign lesions of cervix. A 70-year-old woman misdiagnosed as cervical adenocarcinoma was referred to our clinic, and the lesion was ultimately evaluated as microglandular adenocarcinoma in repeat of endometrial curettage specimen. Postoperatively, histopathologic examination of specimen revealed grade 1 microglandular adenocarcinoma. To our best knowledge, this is the twelfth case of uterine carcinoma simulating microglandular hyperplasia in the literature. Because microglandular adenocarcinoma can be confused with benign lesions like microglandular hyperplasia and malignant lesions of cervix, we aim to discuss the clinical, demographic and immunohistochemical characteristics of the patients with microglandular adenocarcinoma useful in differential diagnosis.
    Gynecologic Oncology 01/2006; 99(3):778-81. DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.08.009 · 3.69 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We report two cases of endometrial microglandular adenocarcinoma, a rare neoplasm, which, in its morphologic features, mimics cervical microglandular hyperplasia and mucinous proliferations of endometrium. The criteria for a correct pathological diagnosis, such as clinical, morphologic, and immunohistochemical data, are emphasized. For the first time, we probed to establish whether endometrial mucinous microglandular adenocarcinoma could be correlated to human papilloma virus (HPV) infection by using polymerase chain reaction amplification (PCR) of tumoral DNA. Similar to previous studies reported in the literature, the present lesions, occurring in postmenopausal women, immunohistochemically showed positivity for B72.3, Ca 125, CEA, Vimentin, estrogen and progesterone receptors, and negativity for p53. Molecular study by PCR amplification of tumor DNA showed no signal for HPV DNA in any of these cases; thus, this variant of endometrial carcinoma is not caused by the HPV infection, but probably by other pathogenetic mechanisms, such as an accumulation of the mutations, which arrive in old age or as the consequence of a peculiar hormonal situation.
    International Journal of Gynecological Pathology 02/2006; 25(1):77-82. DOI:10.1097/01.pgp.0000177126.15314.bd · 1.63 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Mucinous and microglandular adenocarcinomas of the endometrium (MUC-AD and MIGL-AD, respectively) are uncommon types of endometrial cancer. When present in endometrial biopsy or curettage, these tumors may display a unique microglandular architectural pattern mimicking benign microglandular hyperplasia (MGH) of the endocervix. We compared the immunoprofile of MUC-AD and MIGL-AD with that of MGH and benign endocervical glands to identify the markers that would reliably separate these malignancies from benign endocervical tissue. A total of 10 MIGL-AD and 30 MUC-AD cases were collected for the study. Fifteen consecutive cases of benign endocervical glands and MGH were used as a control group. All cases were stained for vimentin, p16, Ki-67, BCL-2, survivin, CD10, and CD34. p16 was the only marker that showed a significantly different staining pattern between the benign and malignant cases, whereas the staining for vimentin, Ki-67, BCL-2, and survivin demonstrated marked overlaps. All but 1 MUC-AD and MIGL-AD cases were positive for p16, whereas none of the cases of benign mucinous endocervical epithelium and MGH showed p16 positivity. Furthermore, the stromal cells of endocervix demonstrated weak to moderate positivity for CD10 and strong positivity for CD34, whereas endometrial tumors showed a reverse pattern, with strong stromal positivity for CD10 and either no, or only weak, staining for CD34. In conclusion, epithelial p16 and stromal CD10/CD34 immunostaining can be useful in distinguishing MUC-AD and MIGL-AD from benign endocervical epithelium in endometrial sampling.
    International journal of gynecological pathology: official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists 09/2008; 27(4):547-54. DOI:10.1097/PGP.0b013e318177eadc · 1.63 Impact Factor
Show more