Prospective study of prodromal features for bipolarity in well Amish children.

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Miami School of Medicine, USA.
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (Impact Factor: 6.35). 07/2003; 42(7):786-96. DOI: 10.1097/01.CHI.0000046878.27264.12
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT A prospective study of psychiatrically well Amish children to determine differences in the frequency and pattern of clinical features that may be prodromal for bipolar I disorder.
Children with a bipolar I parent (n = 100) and children of well parents in a matched control sample (n = 110) were assessed annually for 7 years with semistructured interviews covering medical/developmental features and symptoms/behaviors that are possibly prodromal for bipolarity. Randomized histories of these 210 children were evaluated blindly by 4 clinicians for independent ratings of risk for bipolarity.
Thirty-eight percent of the children of bipolar parents were rated as at risk compared with 17% of children in the control sample. Most control sample children with risk ratings had well parents with a bipolar sibling (i.e., family history positive). Children with family histories negative for mental illness rarely received even a low risk rating. Clinical features significantly (p <or=.05) more frequent among children of a bipolar parent included mood lability, low energy, anxious/worried, hyper-alert, attention problems/distractible and school role impairment, easily excited, sensitivity, somatic complaints, and stubborn/determined.
Mini-clusters of early possible predictors suggest a natural history of episodic prodromal features rather than the chronic symptom pattern sometimes described for children at risk for bipolar disorder.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The primary care setting is considered the entry point of adolescents with mental illness in the health care system. This article informs primary care providers about the diagnostic features and differential of mood disorders in adolescents, screening and assessment, as well as evidence-based psychosocial and psychopharmacologic therapies. The article also provides a framework for decision making regarding initiating treatment in the primary care setting and referral to mental health services. Furthermore, the article highlights the importance of the collaboration between primary care and mental health providers to facilitate engagement of adolescents with mood disorders and adherence to treatment.
    Primary Care Clinics in Office Practice 09/2014; 41(3):587–606. · 0.83 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background We aimed to outline the early risk factors for adult bipolar disorder (BPD) in adolescents with mood disorders.Methods Adolescents (16¿17 years old) with mood disorders (n¿=¿287; 90 participants with hypomania spectrum episodes and 197 with major depressive disorder [MDD]) were identified from a community sample. Fifteen years later (at 30¿33 years of age), mood episodes were assessed (n¿=¿194). The risk of developing BPD (n¿=¿22), compared with MDD (n¿=¿104) or no mood episodes in adulthood (n¿=¿68), was estimated via logistic regression. Adolescent mood symptoms, non-mood disorders, and family characteristics were assessed as potential risk factors.ResultsAmong the adolescents with mood disorders, a family history of BPD was the strongest predictor of developing BPD compared with having no mood episodes in adulthood (OR¿=¿5.94; 95% CI¿=¿1.11-31.73), whereas disruptive disorders significantly increased the risk of developing BPD compared with developing MDD (OR¿=¿2.94; CI¿=¿1.06-8.12). The risk that adolescents with MDD would develop adult BPD, versus having no mood episodes in adulthood, was elevated among those with an early disruptive disorder (OR¿=¿3.62; CI¿=¿1.09-12.07) or multiple somatic symptoms (OR¿=¿6.60; CI¿=¿1.70-25.67). Only disruptive disorders significantly predicted adult BPD among adolescents with MDD versus continued MDD in adulthood (OR¿=¿3.59; CI¿=¿1.17-10.97). Only a few adolescents with hypomania spectrum episodes continued to have BPD as adults, and anxiety disorders appeared to increase this risk.Conclusions Although most of the identified potential risk factors are likely general predictors of continued mood disorders, disruptive disorders emerged as specific predictors of developing adult BPD among adolescents with MDD.
    BMC Psychiatry 12/2014; 14(1):3. · 2.24 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective The aim of the present study was to investigate the psychometric properties of the Bipolar Prodrome Symptom Interview and Scale–Prospective (BPSS-P), the first specific interview for emerging bipolar disorder (BD) symptoms.MethodsA total of 205 youth aged 12–23 years and/or their caregivers underwent BPSS-P interviews: 129 patients with mood spectrum disorders [depression spectrum disorder (n = 77), mood disorder not otherwise specified (NOS) (n = 27), BD-NOS (n = 14), bipolar I disorder (BD-I)/bipolar II disorder (BD-II)/cyclothymia (n = 11), 34 with non-mood spectrum disorders, and 42 healthy controls (HCs)]. We used Cronbach's α to assess internal consistency; intra-class correlation (ICC) for inter-rater reliability; Spearman's rho for convergent validity with the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS), General Behavior Inventory–10-item Mania Form (GBI-M-10), and Cyclothymic–Hypersensitive Temperament (CHT) scale; and analysis of variance for discriminatory power between diagnostic groups.ResultsInternal consistency was good to very good for the BPSS-P Mania (Cronbach's α = 0.87), Depression (Cronbach's α = 0.89), and General Symptom indices (Cronbach's α = 0.74). Inter-rater reliability was high for the BPSS-P Total score (ICC = 0.939), and BPSS-P Mania (ICC = 0.934), Depression (ICC = 0.985), and General (ICC = 0.981) indices. Convergent validity was large (ρ ≥ 0.50) between the BPSS-P Mania Index and YMRS, GBI-M-10, and CHT; BPSS-P Depression Index and Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and CHT; and BPSS-P General Index and GBI-M-10 and CHT. Expectedly, convergent validity was small (ρ = 0.10 to < 0.30) between the BPSS-P Mania Index and MADRS, and BPSS-P Depression Index and YMRS. Furthermore, the BPSS-P and its subscales discriminated each patient group from HCs and from non-mood spectrum patients (except for the BPSS-P General Index). Moreover, the BPSS-P Total score discriminated BD-I/BD-II/cyclothymia from depression spectrum patients, and the BPSS-Mania Index differentiated all three bipolar spectrum groups from depression spectrum patients.Conclusions The BPSS-P has good to excellent psychometric properties. Its use across multiple settings and predictive validity requires further investigation.
    Bipolar Disorders 05/2014; · 4.62 Impact Factor


Available from
Dec 25, 2014