IVIG IN Lymes
firstname.lastname@example.org wwww.cidpusa.org Imran Khan
Identification of candidate T-cell epitopes and molecular mimics in
chronic Lyme disease.
Hemmer B, Gran B, Zhao Y, Marques A, Pascal J, Tzou A, Kondo T, Cortese I,
Bielekova B, Straus SE, McFarland HF, Houghten R, Simon R, Pinilla C, Martin R.
Neuroimmunology Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke,
National Institutes of Health, Building 10, Room 5B-16, 10 Center DR MSC 1400,
Bethesda, Maryland 20892-1400, USA.
Elucidating the cellular immune response to infectious agents is a prerequisite for
understanding disease pathogenesis and designing effective vaccines. In the
identification of microbial T-cell epitopes, the availability of purified or recombinant
bacterial proteins has been a chief limiting factor. In chronic infectious diseases such as
Lyme disease, immune-mediated damage may add to the effects of direct infection by
means of molecular mimicry to tissue autoantigens. Here, we describe a new method to
effectively identify both microbial epitopes and candidate autoantigens. The approach
combines data acquisition by positional scanning peptide combinatorial libraries and
biometric data analysis by generation of scoring matrices. In a patient with chronic
neuroborreliosis, we show that this strategy leads to the identification of potentially
relevant T-cell targets derived from both Borrelia burgdorferi and the host. We also found
that the antigen specificity of a single T-cell clone can be degenerate and yet the clone
can preferentially recognize different peptides derived from the same organism, thus
demonstrating that flexibility in T-cell recognition does not preclude specificity. This
approach has potential applications in the identification of ligands in infectious diseases,
tumors and autoimmune diseases.
• Case Reports
PMID: 10581079 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Neurology. 2003 Jun 24;60(12):1916-22.
Related Articles, Links
• Neurology. 2003 Jun 24;60(12):1888-9.
Cognitive function in post-treatment Lyme disease: do additional
Kaplan RF, Trevino RP, Johnson GM, Levy L, Dornbush R, Hu LT, Evans
J, Weinstein A, Schmid CH, Klempner MS.
University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, USA.
BACKGROUND: It is controversial whether additional antibiotic treatment will
improve cognitive function in patients with post-treatment chronic Lyme disease
(PTCLD). OBJECTIVE: To determine whether antibiotic therapy improves
cognitive function in two randomized double-blind placebo-controlled studies of
patients with PTCLD. METHODS: A total of 129 patients with a physician-
documented history of Lyme disease from three study sites in the northeast United
States were studied. Seventy-eight were seropositive for IgG antibodies against
Borrelia burgdorferi, and 51 were seronegative. Patients in each group were
randomly assigned to receive IV ceftriaxone 2 g daily for 30 days followed by
oral doxycycline 200 mg daily for 60 days or matching IV and oral placebos.
Assessments were made at 90 and 180 days after treatment. Symptom severity
was measured from the cognitive functioning, pain, and role functioning scales of
the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS). Memory, attention, and executive
functioning were assessed using objective tests. Mood was assessed using the
Beck Depression Inventory and Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory.
RESULTS: There were no significant baseline differences between seropositive
and seronegative groups. Both groups reported a high frequency of MOS
symptoms, depression, and somatic complaints but had normal baseline
neuropsychological test scores. The combined groups showed significant
decreases in MOS symptoms, higher objective test scores, and improved mood
between baseline and 90 days. However, there were no significant differences
between those receiving antibiotics and placebo. CONCLUSION: Patients with
post-treatment chronic Lyme disease who have symptoms but show no evidence
of persisting Borrelia infection do not show objective evidence of cognitive
impairment. Additional antibiotic therapy was not more beneficial than
• Clinical Trial
• Multicenter Study
• Randomized Controlled Trial
PMID: 12821733 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
N Engl J Med. 2001 Jul 12;345(2):85-92.
Related Articles, Links
Two controlled trials of antibiotic treatment in patients with persistent
symptoms and a history of Lyme disease.
Klempner MS, Hu LT, Evans J, Schmid CH, Johnson GM, Trevino RP, Norton D,
Levy L, Wall D, McCall J, Kosinski M, Weinstein A.
New England Medical Center and Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA,
BACKGROUND: It is controversial whether prolonged antibiotic treatment is effective
for patients in whom symptoms persist after the recommended antibiotic treatment for
acute Lyme disease. METHODS: We conducted two randomized trials: one in 78
patients who were seropositive for IgG antibodies to Borrelia burgdorferi at the time of
enrollment and the other in 51 patients who were seronegative. The patients received
either intravenous ceftriaxone, 2 g daily for 30 days, followed by oral doxycycline, 200
mg daily for 60 days, or matching intravenous and oral placebos. Each patient had well-
documented, previously treated Lyme disease but had persistent musculoskeletal pain,
neurocognitive symptoms, or dysesthesia, often associated with fatigue. The primary
outcome measures were improvement on the physical- and mental-health-component
summary scales of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form General Health
Survey (SF-36)--a scale measuring the health-related quality of life--on day 180 of the
study. RESULTS: After a planned interim analysis, the data and safety monitoring board
recommended that the studies be discontinued because data from the first 107 patients
indicated that it was highly unlikely that a significant difference in treatment efficacy
between the groups would be observed with the planned full enrollment of 260 patients.
Base-line assessments documented severe impairment in the patients' health-related
quality of life. In intention-to-treat analyses, there were no significant differences in the
outcomes with prolonged antibiotic treatment as compared with placebo. Among the
seropositive patients who were treated with antibiotics, there was improvement in the
score on the physical-component summary scale of the SF-36, the mental-component
summary scale, or both in 37 percent, no change in 29 percent, and worsening in 34
percent; among seropositive patients receiving placebo, there was improvement in 40
percent, no change in 26 percent, and worsening in 34 percent (P=0.96 for the
comparison between treatment groups). The results were similar for the seronegative
patients. CONCLUSIONS: There is considerable impairment of health-related quality of
life among patients with persistent symptoms despite previous antibiotic treatment for
acute Lyme disease. However, in these two trials, treatment with intravenous and oral
antibiotics for 90 days did not improve symptoms more than placebo.
PMID: 11450676 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH
National Institute of
Allergy and Infectious Diseases
National Institute of
Neurological Disorders and Stroke
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE
Monday, November 29, 1999
5:00 p.m. EST
Laurie K. Doepel (NIAID)
Paul Girolami (NINDS)
New Tool Provides Major Advance
for Understanding Chronic Lyme Disease and Other Illnesses
One of the most frustrating puzzles of Lyme disease is why some people develop
debilitating chronic complications despite receiving recommended treatment.
Now scientists have developed a new method to explore if these arthritic and
neurologic symptoms result from the body's immune system turning against itself.
Knowing the answer is key to developing better ways to diagnose Lyme disease,
and to treat and possibly prevent its complications.
A report describing this research, led by scientists at the National Institutes of
Health (NIH), appears in the December issue of Nature Medicine.
"This finding is a major advance for Lyme disease researchers and their patients,"
notes Anthony S. Fauci, M.D., director of the National Institute of Allergy and
Infectious Diseases (NIAID). "We now have a powerful new tool to investigate
what role autoimmune mechanisms play in the development of chronic symptoms
associated with Lyme disease. We also can use this strategy to study other
infectious and immunologic diseases."
Adriana Marques, M.D., of NIAID's Laboratory of Clinical Investigation, heads
one of the Institute's two large studies of chronic Lyme disease and co-authored
the new report.
The new technique, developed by Roland Martin, M.D., of the National Institute
of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), Richard Simon, Ph.D., of the
National Cancer Institute (NCI), together with Clemencia Pinilla, Ph.D., of the Torrey
Pines Institute for Molecular Studies, San Diego, was tested on a sample taken from a
patient in the NIAID study. The patient has chronic central nervous system disease and a
strong immune response against the Lyme agent, Borrelia burgdorferi, in both his spinal
fluid and blood. Their technique identified the specific bits of the Lyme agent his T cells
recognized when they mounted an immune response against the bacterium. Equally
important, it pinpointed candidate self-antigens, snippets of his own cells that mimicked
those recognition sites on the bacterium.
The existence of these microbial mimics does not prove they cross-react with the
immune system and cause the body to turn on itself, but it is a major step in
investigating that possibility. Dr. Marques and her collaborators at NIH and Tufts
University's Mark Klempner, M.D., leader of the other large NIAID-supported chronic
Lyme disease study, are now planning to use this method to check samples from other
patients to see if they have similar autoantigen profiles. If those results look promising,
further investigations can be done, including trying to recreate the autoimmune disease
model in small animals.
According to the study team, their strategy opens up new avenues for
understanding the immune response involved in a variety of diseases where the
causative agent has not yet been identified, such as rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes
or inflammatory bowel disease. It also can be used to help design novel vaccines
against infectious agents and tumors, and to identify candidate self-antigens and
develop ways to turn off unwanted immune responses they might generate. "We
are already using this technique in our study of multiple sclerosis," notes Dr.
For the research reported here, the scientists used the T cells found in the patient's
spinal fluid to probe for what might be triggering the immune response causing
his disease. First, they grew T cells that reacted against a mixture of all the
bacterium's proteins. Then they tested that T-cell clone against a library of 200
mixtures of peptides, small pieces of proteins made from combinations of the 20
known amino acids. Each peptide was 10 amino acids in length; one amino acid
was held constant while the other nine were randomized. Next, they numerically
ranked each amino acid according to the strength of the immune response it
generated at each position in the peptide. Finally, they performed a computer
search of three databanks-the human genome, B. burgdorferi and all known viral
proteins-to find any peptide sequences that matched their most reactive peptides.
This search enabled them to identify candidate antigens and self-antigens
potentially implicated in the disease.
The team found that the T-cell clone recognized multiple peptides, including
some derived from viruses, as well as human autoantigens potentially important in
the chronic Lyme disease process. While the response of the T-cell clone to B.
burgdorferi peptides was strongest, its reactivity with multiple human proteins
indicates that these T cells may be continuously stimulated either by the
bacterium or by the human proteins, possibly leading to autoimmune tissue
The report's other co-authors are Dr. Bernhard Hemmer (now at the University of
Marburg, Germany); Drs. Bruno Gran, Abraham Tzou, Takayuki Kondo, Irene
Cortese, Bibiana Bielekova and Henry F. McFarland from NINDS; Dr. Yingdong