On episode sensitization in recurrent affective disorders: The role of noises

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Marburg, Rudolf-Bultmannstrasse 8, D-35033 Marburg, Germany.
Neuropsychopharmacology (Impact Factor: 7.83). 08/2003; 28 Suppl 1:S13-20. DOI: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300141
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Episode sensitization is postulated as a key mechanism underlying the long-term course of recurrent affective disorders. Functionally, episode sensitization represents positive feedback between a disease process and its disease episodes resulting in a transition from externally triggered to autonomous episode generation. Recently, we introduced computational approaches to elucidate the functional properties of sensitization. Specifically, we considered the dynamics of episode sensitization with a simple computational model. The present study extends this work by investigating how naturally occurring, internal or external, random influences ("noise") affect episode sensitization. Our simulations demonstrate that actions of noise differ qualitatively in dependence on both the model's activity state as well as the noise intensity. Thereby induction as well as suppression of sensitization can be observed. Most interestingly, externally triggered sensitization development can be minimized by tuning the noise to intermediate intensities. Our findings contribute to the conceptual understanding of the clinical kindling model for affective disorders and also indicate interesting roles for random fluctuations in kindling and sensitization at the neuronal level.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objectives We sought to study the underlying dynamic processes involved in mood regulation in subjects with bipolar disorder and healthy control subjects using time-series analysis and to then analyze the relation between anxiety and mood using cross-correlation techniques.Methods We recruited 30 healthy controls and 30 euthymic patients with bipolar disorder. Participants rated their mood, anxiety, and energy levels using a paper-based visual analog scale; and they also recorded their sleep and any life events. Information on these variables was provided over a three-month period on a daily basis, twice per day. We analyzed the data using Box–Jenkins time series analysis to obtain information on the autocorrelation of the series (for mood) and cross-correlation (mood and anxiety series).ResultsThroughout the study, we analyzed 10,170 data points. Self-ratings for mood, anxiety, and energy were normally distributed in both groups. Autocorrelation functions for mood in both groups were governed by the autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) (1,1,0) model, which means that current values in the series were related to one previous point only. We also found a negative cross-correlation between mood and anxiety.Conclusions Mood can be considered a memory stochastic process; it is a flexible, dynamic process that has a ‘short memory’ both in healthy controls and euthymic patients with bipolar disorder. This process may be quite different in untreated patients or in those acutely ill. Our results suggest that nonlinear measures can be applied to the study of mood disorders.
    Bipolar Disorders 08/2014; 17(2). DOI:10.1111/bdi.12246 · 4.89 Impact Factor
  • Journal of Critical Care 12/2005; 20(4):383-384. DOI:10.1016/j.jcrc.2005.09.020 · 2.19 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Central pattern generators are neuron networks that produce vital rhythmic motor outputs such as those observed in mastication, walking and breathing. Their activity patterns depend on the tuning of their intrinsic ionic conductances, their synaptic interconnectivity and entrainment by extrinsic neurons. The influence of two commonly found synaptic connectivities - reciprocal inhibition and electrical coupling - are investigated here using a neuron model with subthreshold oscillation capability, in different firing and entrainment regimes. We study the dynamics displayed by a network of a pair of neurons with various firing regimes, coupled by either (i) only reciprocal inhibition or by (ii) electrical coupling first and then reciprocal inhibition. In both scenarios a range of coupling strengths for the reciprocal inhibition is tested, and in general the neuron with the lower firing rate stops spiking for strong enough inhibitory coupling, while the faster neuron remains active. However, in scenario (ii) the originally slower neuron stops spiking at weaker inhibitory coupling strength, suggesting that the electrical coupling introduces an element of instability to the two-neuron network.
    Biosystems 11/2014; 127:73-83. DOI:10.1016/j.biosystems.2014.11.002 · 1.47 Impact Factor


Available from
May 26, 2014