How can research organizations more effectively transfer research knowledge to decision makers?

McMaster University.
Milbank Quarterly (Impact Factor: 5.06). 02/2003; 81(2):221-48, 171-2. DOI: 10.1111/1468-0009.t01-1-00052
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Five questions--What should be transferred to decision makers? To whom should it be transferred? By whom? How? With what effect?--provide an organizing framework for a knowledge transfer strategy. Opportunities for improving how research organizations transfer research knowledge can be found in the differences between the answers suggested by our understanding of the research literature and those provided by research-organization directors asked to describe what they do. In Canada, these opportunities include developing actionable messages for decision makers (only 30 percent of research organizations frequently or always do this), developing knowledge-uptake skills in target audiences and knowledge-transfer skills in research organizations (only 20 to 22 percent frequently or always do this), and evaluating the impact of knowledge-transfer activities (only 8 to 12 percent frequently or always conduct an evaluation). Research funders can help research organizations take advantage of these opportunities.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: When analyzing the organizational side of the universities’ involvement in standards’ creating bodies, we observe that the university administration is insufficiently aware of its faculty’s contributions to this process. Taking part in standards’ creation is considered more as a byproduct of the scientific research activities rather than one of possible applications of its results. The only situation when the university’s contribution to standards’ creation becomes officially registered is the case where the researchers act as a subcontractor for one of the standards’ creating institutions (public or private). Due to the specific nature of industry-science interactions in the framework of standardization, it is difficult to design a policy measure directly dealing with this kind of collaboration. Nonetheless, the following more general policy measures can contribute to stimulating the universities’ participation in standards’ creation: · provide direct incentives for scientists to engage in industry-science interactions, which will eventually spillover into more close collaboration in the standards’ creating bodies; · provide preconditions for entrepreneurship in academia, which will stimulate scientists to seek additional channels for interactions with the industry; · encourage public-private research collaborations to strengthen the match in research activities by placing additional requirements for scientific expert assessment of some standards’ specifications; · increase absorptive capacity of private firms, which will eventually stimulate more demand for scientific expertise during standards’ development. Finally, it is advisable to bring standardization into the research agendas of the Belgian universities and recognize it as a viable application for the results of scientific research. We believe that this measure alone can provide a notable contribution to the more intensive industry-science interactions in the framework of standards’ creation and normalization.
    KENNISUITWISSELING EN TECHNOLOGIEOVERDRACHT TUSSEN HET BEDRIJFSLEVEN EN DE ONDERZOEKSWERELD, D/2009/1191/2 edited by André Spithoven, Siska Vandecandelaere, 01/2009: chapter Chapter 9: pages 208-234; Centrale Raad voor het Bedrijfsleven en de Programmatorische Overheidsdienst Federaal Wetenschapsbeleid., ISBN: 978-90-777-3512-1
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Bullying is one of the most challenging issues facing students and schools worldwide. The disastrous consequences for victims and offenders are experienced daily by teachers and students and documented by numerous studies. The demand for evidence-based practice (EBP) in schools’ anti-bullying work has increased in the last decade, consequently evoking considerable debate. Traditionally, evaluations of EBP and evidence-based preventive programs have addressed the impact on outcomes that are measured according to a hierarchy of evidence. The question of “What works?” is only one question among many that are relevant to policy makers and practitioners. The author suggests broadening the approaches to evaluation by developing a knowledge base grounded in research methods and strategies that give voice to the participants as well as provide sound empirical evidence of causal relationships. Research on anti-bullying interventions provides insight into the debate surrounding EBP in general.
    Journal of Educational Change 01/2014;
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although knowledge translation is one of the most widely used concepts in health and medical literature, there is a sense of ambiguity and confusion over its definition. The aim of this paper is to clarify the characteristics of KT. This will assist the theoretical development of it and shape its implementation into the health care system Methods: Walker and Avant's framework was used to analyze the concept and the related literature published between 2000 and 2010 was reviewed. A total of 112 papers were analyzed. Review of the literature showed that "KT is a process" and "implementing refined knowledge into a participatory context through a set of challenging activities" are the characteristics of KT. Moreover, to occur successfully, KT needs some necessary antecedents like an integrated source of knowledge, a receptive context, and preparedness. The main consequence of successful process is a change in four fields of healthcare, i.e. quality of patient care, professional practice, health system, and community. In addition, this study revealed some empirical referents which are helpful to evaluate the process. By aiming to portray a clear picture of KT, we highlighted its attributes, antecedents, consequences and empirical referents. Identifying the characteristics of this concept may resolve the existing ambiguities in its definition and boundaries thereby facilitate distinction from similar concepts. In addition, these findings can be used as a knowledge infrastructure for developing the KT-related models, theories, or tools.
    Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran 01/2014; 28:98.

Full-text (3 Sources)

Available from
Jan 2, 2015