An observational study of intravenous medication errors in the United Kingdom and in Germany

Department of Practice and Policy, School of Pharmacy, University of London, UK.
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy (Impact Factor: 1.27). 07/2003; 25(3):104-11. DOI: 10.1023/A:1024009000113
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To investigate the incidence and the severity of intravenous (i.v.) drug preparation and administration errors in two countries and three pharmacy services.
A disguised observational method was used to record details of the preparation and administration of prescribed i.v. drugs on two wards in each of three teaching hospitals: one with a traditional British ward pharmacy service (TBP) and two hospitals in Germany, one with a traditional ward stock supply (TGP) and one with a satellite pharmacy service (GSP) with unit dose system. Main outcome measures: Errors in i.v. drug preparation and administration and their potential significance.
The number of observed preparations/administrations were: TBP 77/63, TGP 126/109 and GSP 134/106. The preparation error rates were: TBP 22% (95% confidence interval: 13-31%), TGP 23% (16-30%) and GSP 31% (23-39%). The administration error rates were TBP 27% (16-38%), TGP 49% (39-58%) and GSP 22% (14-30%). The percentage of administration errors on the wards with TGP was statistically significantly higher than in the other two services. Common errors at the study sites with TBP and GSP were omissions. Wrong rate of administration occurred most frequently on the wards with TGP. The majority of errors were likely to be of 'moderate' to 'severe' outcome. Careful drug chart reading could possibly reduce omission errors on the wards with TBP. A change of the German nursing law ('Krankenpflegegesetz') to legally entitle nurses to administer i.v. drugs could probably result in better training, national guidelines and standards.
This study found a high rate of i.v. medication errors of moderate to severe significance. Changes in practice should be considered to make i.v. therapy safer for patients.

Download full-text


Available from: Nick Barber, Jul 17, 2015
  • Source
    • "Patients in ICU usually receive more drugs than those in general wards, and the majority of these drugs are given parenterally (Van Den Bemt et al., 2002). Studies have already shown that medication administration errors are more likely to occur in the parenteral route of administration, including the intravenous one, compared with other routes such as the oral route (Wirtz et al., 2003). Furthermore, ICU patients are usually sedated; therefore, they cannot intercept possible errors themselves (Tissot et al., 2003). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Medication errors are recognized causes of patient morbidity and mortality in hospital settings, and can occur at any stage of the medication management process. Medication administration errors are reported to occur more frequently in critical care settings, and can be associated with severe consequences. However, patient safety research tends to focus on accident causations rather than organizational factors which enhance patient safety and health care resilience to unsafe practice. The Organizational Safety Space Model was developed for high-risk industries to investigate factors that influence organizational safety. Its application in health care settings may offer a unique approach to understand organizational safety in the health care context, particularly in investigating the safety of medication administration in adult critical care settings. This literature review explores the development and use of the Organizational Safety Space Model in the industrial context, and considers its application in investigating the safety of medication administration in adult critical care settings. SEARCH STRATEGIES (INCLUSION AND EXCLUSION CRITERIA): CINAHL, Medline, British Nursing Index (BNI) and PsychInfo databases were searched for peer-reviewed papers, published in English, from 1970 to 2011 with relevance to organizational safety and medication administration in critical care, using the key words: organization, safety, nurse, critical care and medication administration. Archaeological searching, including grey literature and governmental documents, was also carried out. From the identified 766 articles, 51 studies were considered relevant. The Organizational Safety Space Model offers a productive, conceptual system framework to critically analyse the wider organizational issues, which may influence the safety of medication administration and organizational resilience to accidents. However, the model needs to be evaluated for its application in health care settings in general and critical care in particular. Nurses would offer a valuable insight in explaining how the Organizational Safety Space Model can be used to analyse the organizational contributions towards medication administration in adult critical care settings.
    Nursing in Critical Care 07/2012; 17(4):189-97. DOI:10.1111/j.1478-5153.2012.00500.x · 0.87 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "rt , but the calculation is defined as incorrect due to the prescription being unclear and read incorrectly . This error is not a calculation error caused by the nurses ' inability to manip - ulate the numbers and arrive at the correct dosage , but caused by an error in the numbers being used as a result of an illegible pre - scription . Similarly Wirtz et al . ( 2003 ) indicate that six of the 51 dosages requiring a calculation led to dose errors . There is no fur - ther detail given about what contributed to the errors . The Cowley et al . ( 2001 ) review of error reports highlights calculation errors as a category , but does not define what errors would be included in this category . Finally the C"
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This review aims to examine the literature available to ascertain whether medication errors in clinical practice are the result of nurses’ miscalculating drug dosages. The research studies highlighting poor calculation skills of nurses and student nurses have been tested using written drug calculation tests in formal classroom settings [Kapborg, I., 1994. Calculation and administration of drug dosage by Swedish nurses, student nurses and physicians. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 6(4): 389 –395; Hutton, M., 1998. Nursing Mathematics: the importance of application Nursing Standard 13(11): 35–38; Weeks, K., Lynne, P., Torrance, C., 2000. Written drug dosage errors made by students: the threat to clinical effectiveness and the need for a new approach. Clinical Effectiveness in Nursing 4, 20–29]; Wright, K., 2004. Investigation to find strategies to improve student nurses’ maths skills. British Journal Nursing 13(21) 1280–1287; Wright, K., 2005. An exploration into the most effective way to teach drug calculation skills to nursing students. Nurse Education Today 25, 430–436], but there have been no reviews of the literature on medication errors in practice that specifically look to see whether the medication errors are caused by nurses’ poor calculation skills. The databases Medline, CINAHL, British Nursing Index (BNI), Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) and Archives and Cochrane reviews were searched for research studies or systematic reviews which reported on the incidence or causes of drug errors in clinical practice. In total 33 articles met the criteria for this review. There were no studies that examined nurses’ drug calculation errors in practice. As a result studies and systematic reviews that investigated the types and causes of drug errors were examined to establish whether miscalculations by nurses were the causes of errors.
    Nurse education today 09/2009; 30(1):85-97. DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2009.06.009 · 1.46 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Observational studies conducted in teaching and district hospitals in the US, UK, Germany and France have found error rates of between 49% and 94% of IVs administered.[7] [8] [9] [10] An Australian study of IV fluid administrations in three surgical wards in one hospital found an MAE rate of 18%.[11] With the increasing complexity of hospital patients and the associated increase in the number and types of medications per patient, the potential for MAEs is likely to increase. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: One-third of medication errors that cause patient harm arise from medication administration errors (MAEs). Research regarding rates of MAEs is limited and has predominantly relied upon voluntary incident reports or observational studies. Traditionally, observational studies have used paper-based data collection. This is time intensive and creates distraction from actual observation, limits the amount of information recorded and requires transcription of data. Incorporating the use of handheld computers for data collection in MAE studies provides an opportunity to overcome some of these limitations. Our objective was to develop and test an observational method which incorporated the use of data collection software on a personal digital assistant (PDA, a handheld computer) for use in observational studies to monitor MAEs within hospitals.
    Studies in health technology and informatics 02/2009; 146:429-33. DOI:10.3233/978-1-60750-024-7-429
Show more