Article

What oocyte donors aren't told?

University of Ottawa, Canada.
The American Journal of Bioethics (Impact Factor: 3.6). 02/2001; 1(4):W3. DOI: 10.1162/152651601317139351
Source: PubMed
0 Bookmarks
 · 
28 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In 1999 I interviewed a 29 year old woman, Nora, in a small northern Canadian city about her thoughts, plans and expectations about getting pregnant. Although she had tried to get pregnant before and was still hoping to, she had gone back to university and had decided to put the plans to become pregnant on hold. During the conversation, I mentioned an article that had recently appeared in the New Yorker magazine (Mead 1999) reporting that women were being paid U.S. 15,000-15,000-20,000 to “donate” their eggs for fertility purposes. Nora looked at me, questioningly: “15,000-15,000-20,000?” “That was a high amount,” I replied. She nodded, “Hmm. It sounds too good to be true.“ I described the content of the article a bit more, as well as the advertisement that had inspired it. Nora reflected: But, I mean, the donor ... I mean it’s, if she wants to, it’s her responsibility to be responsible to know what’s happening to her body. But if somebody is looking for a donor, there’s nothing wrong with that. But is education provided out there? Or are resources out there for women to research them? Because, if somebody put in an ad and I saw the ad, and, you know, $20,000 ... Yeah, I’d want to do it. But I’d also want to check, have the resources to look into it. What’s going to happen to my body taking fertility [drugs]? How do I match my cycles to the other person’s cycle? And how much damage are they going to do to my body when they do surgery? And do I have to go for the surgery, or ...?
    01/2009;