Differential effects of oral and transdermal estrogen/progesterone regimens on sensitivity to activated protein C among postmenopausal women - A randomized trial

Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou (Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Ouest), Lutetia Parisorum, Île-de-France, France
Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology (Impact Factor: 5.53). 09/2003; 23(9):1671-6. DOI: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000087141.05044.1F
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Activated protein C (APC) resistance not related to the factor V Leiden mutation is a risk factor for venous thrombosis. Oral estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) has been reported to induce APC resistance. Little is known about the effect of transdermal estrogen.
We enrolled 196 postmenopausal women who were randomly allocated to receive either 1 mg 17beta-estradiol orally (n=63) or 50 microg 17beta-estradiol transdermally per day (n=68), both associated with 100 mg progesterone daily or placebo (n=65) for 6 months. An activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT)-based test and the effect of APC on thrombin potential (ETP) were used. Oral ERT induced an ETP-based APC resistance compared with both placebo (P=0.006) and transdermal ERT (P<0.001), but there was no significant effect of transdermal ERT compared with placebo (P=0.191). There was no significant effect of ERT on the APTT-based APC sensitivity ratio. Prothrombin fragment 1+2 plasma levels were significantly higher after 6 months of treatment in women allocated to oral ERT compared with those on placebo and transdermal ERT and were positively and significantly correlated with changes in ETP-based APC sensitivity ratio.
Our data show that oral, unlike transdermal, estrogen induces APC resistance and activates blood coagulation. These results emphasize the importance of the route of estrogen administration.


Available from: V. Kerlan, Jun 03, 2015
  • Source
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Many large trials in the past 15 years have proven an increased risk of vascular complications in women using oral, mostly non-bioidentical, hormone therapy. The risk of vascular complications depends on the route of administration (oral versus transdermal), age, duration of administration, and type of hormones (bioidentical versus non-bioidentical). Acquired and/or hereditary thrombophilias (eg, factor V Leiden, prothrombin mutation G20210A, and others) lead to a further increase of risk for venous thromboembolism, stroke, or myocardial infarction. Therefore, bioidentical hormone therapy via the transdermal route seems to be the safest opportunity for hormone replacement therapy, although large trials for bioidentical hormone therapy are needed.
    International Journal of General Medicine 09/2014; 7:433-40. DOI:10.2147/IJGM.S46310
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major harmful effect of hormone therapy (HT) among postmenopausal women. A large variety of HT can be used with significant differences in adverse effects. There is evidence that the VTE risk among HT users depends on the route of estrogen administration. Oral but not transdermal estrogens dose-dependently increase the VTE risk. This difference is supported by biological data. Whereas oral estrogens increase thrombin generation and induce resistance to activated protein C, transdermal estrogens have minimal effect on hemostasis. Past users of oral estrogens have a similar VTE risk to never users. Among users of oral estrogens, the VTE risk is higher within the 1st year of treatment. The combination of oral estrogen use and either obesity or thrombogenic mutations further enhances the VTE risk, whereas transdermal estrogens may not confer additional risk in women at high VTE risk. Significant differences in the VTE risk between HT preparations are also related to the type of concomitant progestogen. The VTE risk is greater in women using medroxyprogesterone acetate than in those receiving other progestins, whereas micronized progesterone appears safe. Based on the current data, transdermal estrogen alone or combined with progesterone could be the safer HT especially in women at high risk for thrombosis. © 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel.
    Frontiers of hormone research 01/2014; 43:21-32. DOI:10.1159/000360554 · 1.24 Impact Factor