Article

Echocardiographic prediction of left ventricular dysfunction after mitral valve repair for mitral regurgitation as an indicator to decide the optimal timing of repair.

Department of Cardiology, Sakakibara Heart Institute, Yoyogi, Tokyo, Japan.
Journal of the American College of Cardiology (Impact Factor: 14.09). 08/2003; 42(3):458-63. DOI: 10.1016/S0735-1097(03)00649-1
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This study sought to determine whether echocardiography before mitral valve repair (MVR) for mitral regurgitation (MR) was predictive of postoperative left ventricular (LV) dysfunction and useful for deciding the optimal timing of repair.
Some reports have shown that the preoperative echocardiographic data of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVDs) were good predictors of postoperative LV dysfunction. However, few reports were based on long-term follow-up data of large numbers of patients who underwent MVR in the last decade.
A total of 274 patients with moderate or severe MR underwent MVR between October 1, 1991, and September 30, 2000. Among them, 171 patients who had both an operation for isolated MR due to degenerative pathology and a postoperative echocardiogram were studied. Postoperative echocardiograms were performed 3.9 +/- 2.4 years after the operation. The LVEF decreased from 66 +/- 10% before surgery to 63 +/- 11% after surgery (p < 0.0001). On univariate analysis, preoperative LVEF and LVDs correlated with postoperative LVEF (r = 0.41 and r = -0.39, respectively). Overall, postoperative LV dysfunction (defined as LVEF <50%) was not frequent (12%). However, the incidence of postoperative LV dysfunction was high in patients with preoperative LVEF <55% (38%) or LVDs > or =40 mm (23%).
In patients with MR, the echocardiographic data of LVEF and LVDs were good predictors of postoperative LV dysfunction. When a decrease in LVEF or an increase in LVDs is detected, MVR should be considered to preserve postoperative LV function.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
46 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: To assess the prevalence, determinants and prognosis value of right ventricular (RV) ejection fraction (EF) impairment in organic mitral regurgitation (MR). METHODS AND RESULTS: Two-hundred-eight patients (62±12 years, 138 males) with chronic organic MR referred to surgery underwent an echocardiography and bi-ventricular radionuclide angiography with regional function assessment. Mean RV EF was 40.4±10.2%, ranging from 10 to 65%. RV EF was severely impaired (≤35%) in 63 patients (30%), and biventricular impairment (LV EF<60% and RV EF≤35%) was found in 34 patients (16%). Pathophysiologic correlates of RV EF were LV septal function (β-hat=0.42, P<0.0001), LV end diastolic diameter index (β-hat =-0.22, P=0.002) and PASP (β-hat =-0.14, P=0.047). Mitral effective regurgitant orifice size (n=84) influenced RV EF (β-hat =-0.28, P=0.012). In 68 patients examined after surgery, RV EF increased strongly (27.5±4.3 to 37.9±7.3, P<0.0001) in patients with depressed RV EF while it did not change in others (P=0.91). RV EF≤35% impaired 10-year cardiovascular survival (71.6±8.4% versus 89.8±3.7%, P=0.037). Biventricular impairment dramatically reduced 10-year cardiovascular survival (51.9±14.3% versus 90.3±3.2%, P<0.0001; HR: 5.2, P<0.0001) even after adjustment for known predictors (HR: 4.6, P=0.004). Biventricular impairment reduced also 10-year overall survival (34.8±13.0% versus 72.6±4.5%, P=0.003; HR: 2.5, P=0.005) even after adjustment for known predictors (P=0.048). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with organic MR referred to surgery RV function impairment is frequent (30%) and depends weakly on PASP but mainly on LV remodelling and septal function. RV function is a predictor of postoperative cardiovascular survival while biventricular impairment is a powerful predictor of both cardiovascular and overall survival.
    Circulation 03/2013; · 15.20 Impact Factor
  • International journal of cardiology 12/2013; · 7.08 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Increased left ventricular (LV) dimensions are an indication for surgery in patients with asymptomatic mitral regurgitation, but M-mode or two-dimensional measurements have known limitations. The aim of this study was to determine the value of three-dimensional echocardiography in predicting postoperative outcomes after mitral surgery. Sixty-seven patients with severe asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic mitral regurgitation (69% men; mean age, 62 ± 13 years) who underwent mitral valve surgery from January 2010 to December 2011 were studied. In addition to standard echocardiography, baseline three-dimensional echocardiography was performed for accurate quantification of LV size. Patients were followed over a median time of 1 month (interquartile range, 0-8 months) for postoperative development of atrial fibrillation or LV dysfunction. A multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify associations with events. Postoperative LV dysfunction developed in 15 patients (22%), and 21 patients (31%) had postoperative atrial fibrillation. There was no association between two-dimensional end-systolic volume index and outcomes (hazard ratio, 1.02; P = .18). Postoperative atrial fibrillation or LV dysfunction was associated with baseline three-dimensional LV end-systolic volume index (hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.16), independent of age and presence of coronary artery disease. LVESVi ≥ 40 mL/m(2) was the best cutoff value to predict postoperative events (sensitivity, 80%; specificity, 85%). After adding LVESVi to a model containing clinical and echocardiographic parameters, net reclassification improvement was 0.27 (95% confidence interval, 0.25-0.29; P = .024). LVESVi from three-dimensional echocardiography is an independent predictor of postoperative outcomes in patients with severe mitral regurgitation that is incremental to other clinical and echocardiographic variables.
    Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography: official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography 03/2014; · 2.98 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

View
13 Downloads
Available from
May 19, 2014