Maxillofacial reconstruction with prefabricated osseous free flaps: a 3-year experience with 24 patients.

Craniofacial Center Hirslanden, Aarau, Switzerland.
Plastic &amp Reconstructive Surgery (Impact Factor: 3.54). 10/2003; 112(3):748-57. DOI: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000069709.89719.79
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Between January of 1998 and May of 2002, 25 prefabricated osseous free flaps (23 fibula and two iliac crest flaps) were transferred in 24 patients to repair maxillary (six flaps) or mandibular (eight flaps) defects after tumor resection, severe maxillary (four flaps) or mandibular (one flap) atrophy (Cawood VI), maxillary (one flap) or mandibular (three flaps) defects after gunshot injury, and maxillary (two flaps) defects after traffic accidents. Prefabrication included insertion of dental implants, positioned with a drilling template in a preplanned position, and split-thickness grafting. Drilling template construction was based on the prosthetic planning. The template determined the position of the implants and the site and angulation of osteotomies, if necessary. The mean delay between prefabrication and flap transfer was 6 weeks (range, 4 to 8 weeks). While the flap was harvested, a bar construction with overdentures was mounted onto the implants. The overdentures were used as an occlusal key for exact three-dimensional positioning of the graft within the defect. The bar construction also helped to stabilize the horseshoe shape of the graft. The follow-up period ranged from 2 months to 4 years (mean, 21 months), during which time two total and three partial flap losses occurred. One total loss was due to thrombosis of the flap veins during the delay period, whereas the other total loss was caused by spasm of the peroneal artery. Two partial losses were due to oversegmentation of the flaps with necrosis of the distal fragment, whereas one partial loss was caused by disruption of the vessel from the distal part. Of the 90 implants that were inserted into the prefabricated flaps during the study period, 10 were lost in conjunction with flap failure; of the remaining 80 implants, four were lost during the observation period, for a success rate of 95 percent. Flap prefabrication based on prosthetic planning offers a powerful tool for various reconstructive problems in the maxillofacial area. Although it involves a two-stage procedure, the time for complete rehabilitation is shorter than with conventional procedures.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The reconstruction of jaws with a free fibula flap can be anticipated virtually. The simulation can be transferred to the operating theater using customized devices obtained from computer-assisted design and manufacturing in a complete digital workflow. Several alternatives are available, from cutting guides to customized titanium osteosynthesis plates, to obtain the best accuracy and reproducibility of reconstruction. Moreover, these new processes allow integrating prosthetic planning concomitantly with reconstruction. We present the virtual three-dimensional planning method for jaw reconstruction with a free fibula flap and the various alternatives of surgery guided by customized devices provided by this planning.
    Revue de stomatologie, de chirurgie maxillo-faciale et de chirurgie orale. 01/2014;
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Because optimal reconstruction of maxillofacial defects requires functional rehabilitation, the current study demonstrates the successful secondary reconstruction of a large mandibular continuity defect using a fully digitally planned prefabricated free vascularized fibula with immediate implant-supported prosthodontic restoration.A 56-year-old man presented with a large mandibular continuity defect after resection of an enlarged squamous cell carcinoma arising from the floor of the mouth. For secondary reconstruction, the shape of the neomandible and implant position for support of the lower prosthesis were planned virtually. The combined cutting and drilling guide was printed in 3 dimensions.In a 2-step surgical approach, first, the implants were inserted into the fibula and covered with a split-thickness skin graft to form a neogingiva. In a second operation, the fibula was harvested, osteotomized, and fixed with the denture on the preinserted implants. The fibula was placed to its final position guided by the occlusion.Using three-dimensional virtual backward planning, it was feasible to perform a mandibular reconstruction with immediate prosthetic rehabilitation.
    The Journal of craniofacial surgery 03/2014; · 0.81 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study aimed to establish surgical guiding techniques for completing mandible lesion resection and reconstruction of the mandible defect area with fibula sections in one surgery by applying additive manufacturing technology, which can reduce the surgical duration and enhance the surgical accuracy and success rate.
    BioMedical Engineering OnLine 05/2014; 13(1):57. · 1.61 Impact Factor