Vito Lorusso |
|
Chief of Medical Oncology isti...
|
|
Ospedale Oncologico "Giovanni Paolo II" di Bari
·
Medical Oncology
|
Publications (197) View all
-
Article: Prolonged exposure to tyrosine kinase inhibitors or early use of everolimus in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: are the two options alike?
Nicola Calvani, Franco Morelli, Vincenzo Chiuri, Antonio Gnoni, Claudio Scavelli, Palma Fedele, Laura Orlando, Evaristo Maiello, Vito Lorusso, Saverio Cinieri[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: We retrospectively analyzed metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients treated with 3 targeted agents. Patients started the sequence with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), sunitinib or sorafenib, and were divided into 2 groups based on the order in which they received the other reciprocal TKI and everolimus (EVE): TKI-TKI-EVE group (n = 19) and TKI-EVE-TKI group (n = 14). Median progression-free survival (PFS) with first TKI was 13 months in the TKI-TKI-EVE group and 10 months in the TKI-EVE-TKI group. PFS with the second agent showed a trend in favor of the TKI-TKI-EVE sequence, with a median of 11 versus 6.5 months, whereas median PFS with the third agent was 6 months in both groups. Total PFS also showed a trend in favor of the TKI-TKI-EVE sequence with a median of 31 versus 23 months. Median overall survival (OS) was 38 months in both groups, with more patients receiving subsequent treatment in the TKI-EVE-TKI group. The subgroup of patients no long-term responders (≤9 months) to first TKI showed similar outcomes irrespective of the sequence. The subgroup of long-term responders to first TKI (>9 months) who received the other TKI instead of EVE had better outcomes in terms of median PFS with the second agent (13 vs. 5.5 months; p = 0.0271), median total PFS (39.5 vs. 23.5 months; p = 0.0415), and median OS (46 vs. 38 months). In conclusion, no apparent advantage was observed with early use of EVE in advanced RCC, even in those patients who did not benefit long from first-line TKI, whereas long-term duration of first-line TKI seems to be predictor of second-line TKI efficacy.Medical Oncology 06/2013; 30(2):578. · 2.14 Impact Factor -
SourceAvailable from: Vito Lorusso
Article: Clinical outcomes in patients receiving three lines of targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: Results from a large patient cohort.
Roberto Iacovelli, Giacomo Cartenì, Cora N Sternberg, Michele Milella, Matteo Santoni, Giuseppe Di Lorenzo, Cinzia Ortega, Roberto Sabbatini, Riccardo Ricotta, Caterina Messina, [......], Francesco Boccardo, Francesco Valduga, Francesco Massari, Valentina Baldazzi, Saverio Cinieri, Alessandra Mosca, Enzo Maria Ruggeri, Alfredo Berruti, Linda Cerbone, Giuseppe Procopio[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: AIM: A number of targeted therapies (TTs) are effective in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) but clinical outcomes with the sequential use of three TTs have been poorly investigated, this study evaluates their outcome. METHODS: Patients with clear cells mRCC treated with three TTs were retrospectively studied. Therapies were classified as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)/vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) or mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTORi). Progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and total PFS (tPFS) - defined as the time from start of first-line to progression on third-line treatment - were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and curves were compared with log-rank test. RESULTS: A total of 2065 patients with mRCC were consecutively treated with first-line TT in 23 centres in Italy. Overall 281/2065 patients (13%) were treated with three TTs. Median OS and tPFS were 44.7 and 34.1months, respectively and were longer in patients receiving the sequence vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors (VEGFi)-VEGFi-mTORi compared with those receiving VEGFi-mTORi-VEGFi with a statistical difference in OS (50.7 versus 37.8months, p=0.004; 36.5 versus 29.3months, p=0.059, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Few patients received three lines of TTs. The sequence VEGFi-VEGFi-mTORi was associated with improved survival with respect to VEGFi-mTORi-VEGFi and primary resistance to first-line was a negative predictive and prognostic factor.European journal of cancer (Oxford, England: 1990) 03/2013; · 4.12 Impact Factor -
SourceAvailable from: Vito Lorusso
Article: Novel plant-derived target drugs: a step forward from licorice?
Vito Lorusso, Ilaria Marech[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Isoliquiritigenin (ISL) is a chalcone compound with valuable pharmacological properties such as antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anticancer and anti-allergic activities. With regard to anticancer property, ISL was able to suppress HIF-1α level, VEGF expression and secretion, cell migration and to decrease the expression and secretion of MMP-9/-2. These effects may be mediated through inhibition of p38, PI3K/Akt and NF-κB signaling pathways. Thus, low concentration of ISL may have therapeutic potential in the treatment of aggressive breast carcinoma and other neoplasms.Expert opinion on therapeutic targets 02/2013; · 3.72 Impact Factor -
SourceAvailable from: Vito Lorusso
Article: Pooled Analysis of Phase II Trials Evaluating Weekly or Conventional Cisplatin as First-Line Therapy for Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma.
Benjamin L Maughan, Neeraj Agarwal, Syed A Hussain, Kenneth M Boucher, Hans Von Der Maase, Donald S Kaufman, Vito Lorusso, Malcolm J Moore, Matthew D Galsky, Guru Sonpavde[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Weekly gemcitabine with GC every 3-4 weeks is considered conventional first-line chemotherapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC). Weekly split-dose cisplatin with wGC might be less toxic and have similar activity, but has not been compared with GC. We pooled published phase II trials of GC and wGC to compare efficacy and safety. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two trials of wGC and 3 trials of GC were identified. Because the data were not derived from randomized trials, GC and wGC were not formally compared, and exact 95% quasi-binomial confidence intervals (CI), for response rates and grade ≥ 3 toxicities were calculated. RESULTS: The 95% CI overlapped, suggesting agreement between wGC and GC. No clear difference in response rates and grade ≥ 3 toxicities between GC and wGC were observed. CONCLUSION: Gemcitabine combined with day 1 cisplatin and wGC yielded similar responses and grade ≥ 3 toxicities in advanced UC in a hypothesis-generating pooled analysis of phase II trials. Considering the probable lower nephrotoxicity of fractionated cisplatin, prospective evaluation of wGC might be warranted across cisplatin-eligible and -ineligible patients to develop a single chemotherapy template for the development of combinations with biological agents in a broad population of patients.Clinical Genitourinary Cancer 01/2013; · 2.61 Impact Factor -
SourceAvailable from: Vito Lorusso
Article: TORCH Study: How Much Longer Should We Continue to Use Erlotinib in Unselected Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer?
Vito Lorusso, Nicola Silvestris, Ilaria MarechJournal of Clinical Oncology 12/2012; · 18.37 Impact Factor