Virendra Singh

Pt. BD Sharma University of Health Sciences, Rohtak · Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery

Topics (3)

Publications (21) View all

  • Article: Unilocular anterior mandibular swelling.
    Shruti Khatana, Virendra Singh, Ambika Gupta
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: PURPOSE: To report a rare case of chondromyxoid fibroma, presenting as an unilocular anterior mandibular swelling, which is one of the least common tumours of bone comprising less than 1% of bone tumours and to review the differential diagnosis and literature for a better understanding of this disease as well as addressing the controversies in respect with its treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Previous reports about this lesion in literature were reviewed wherein data was recorded about the age, sex, race, location of pathology, presenting signs and symptoms, duration of pathology, size, radiographic findings, treatment and any recurrence on follow-up. RESULTS: 25 cases were studied and data compiled. Multisectional histopathological examination is advocated to differentiate it from osteosarcoma. Enucleation with or without curettage with long-term follow-up has been considered to be a satisfactory treatment modality. CONCLUSION: The rarity of the lesion, limited data on the clinical presentation, histological dilemma and treatment options replete with controversies make it a tough predicament. A thorough understanding of the disease and treatment options is indispensable to treat such a case.
    International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology 04/2013; · 0.85 Impact Factor
  • Article: A nonhealing ulcer of mandibular alveolar ridge.
    Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology. 11/2012;
  • Article: Tuberculous osteomyelitis of zygoma: an unusual location.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Tubercular osteomyelitis of midfacial bones is extremely rare, although tuberculosis of long bones and the vertebral column is not uncommon. Because of the rare incidence, myriad presentation, and lack of specific symptoms, this condition presents a challenge in diagnosis and calls for acute clinical awareness. This article presents a case report of a 12-year-old girl with complaints of gradually increasing swelling lateral to and below her right eye for 4 months with pus discharge. She was treated with surgical curettage and 4-drug antitubercular therapy and responded with complete remission of the sinus.
    Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology. 07/2012;
  • Article: Conventional versus 3-dimensional miniplate in management of mandibular fracture: a prospective randomized study.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to compare conventional miniplate (Champy's) and 3-dimensional miniplate fixation in the management of mandibular fracture. Prospective study. The study was carried out in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Govt. Dental College, Pt. B.D. Sharma University of Health Sciences, Rohtak, India. A prospective randomized clinical trial was carried out in 50 patients. Patients were randomly assigned to receive a 2.0-mm 3-dimensional miniplate (group A) or a 2.0-mm conventional miniplate (group B). All patients were followed up for 12 weeks postoperatively. Complications were analyzed according to the type of plate used and the site of fracture. Twenty-eight fracture sites were treated with the 3-dimensional miniplate and 28 with the conventional miniplate. Five complications occurred, representing 8.9% of the total. Two complications occurred in group A and 3 in group B, with complication rates equaling 7.14% and 10.71%, respectively. When comparing the overall complication rates according to plates used, the χ(2) test showed no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (P > .05). No major difference in terms of treatment outcome is observed in both systems, and both are equally effective in managing mandibular fracture.
    Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 05/2012; 147(3):450-5. · 1.72 Impact Factor
  • Article: A comparative clinical evaluation of the outcome of patients treated for bilateral fracture of the mandibular condyles.
    Virendra Singh, Amrish Bhagol, Rahul Dhingra
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To compare open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with closed treatment and maxillomandibular fixation (CRMMF) for management of bilateral subcondylar fractures of the mandible. This study involved a retrospective analysis of bilateral subcondylar fractures of the mandible treated at Government Dental College, Rohtak from 2007 to 2010. Data were collected by a review of pertinent inpatient and outpatient clinic records, and radiographic results. Patients were followed up weekly for 4 weeks and then at 2, 3 and 6 months after surgery. At these visits, careful attention was paid to clinical parameters included mouth opening, protrusion, laterotrusion, deviation on mouth opening and occlusion. The patient sample ranged in age from 19 to 55 years, with an average age of 28.2 years. In total, 44 patients with 88 mandibular subcondylar fractures were included in the study. Out of these, 20 patients were managed by closed treatment and 24 by ORIF of the subcondylar fractures (19 unilateral and 5 bilateral). Regarding mouth opening/lateral excursion/protrusion, significant (p=0.00) differences were observed between both groups (open 37.6/11.5/5.9 mm versus closed 31.5/7.8/3.1mm). The visual analogue scoring revealed significant (p=0.00) difference with less pain in the operative treatment group (1.3 open versus 7.2 closed). Statistically significant difference was found between two groups for occlusion (p=0.00). The current retrospective study shows that operative treatment was superior in all objective and subjective functional parameters. It is concluded that if either of the condyles is displaced ORIF is the most satisfactory method of treatment.
    Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery: official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery 10/2011; 40(5):464-6. · 1.25 Impact Factor

Following (4) See all

Followers (6) See all