Ursula Lechel
Research interests
-
InterestsRadiation Dosimetry, Radiation Protection, Radiation detection
Publications
-
2.95Impact points
Radiation dose at coronary CT angiography: second-generation dual-source CT versus single-source 64-MDCT and first-generation dual-source CT.
AJR. American journal of roentgenology. 05/2011; 196(5):W550-7.
The purpose of this study was to assess the radiation doses of different coronary CTA (CTA) protocols: second-generation dual-source 128-MDCT, first-generation dual-source 64-MDCT, and single-source 64-MDCT. Thermoluminescent dosimetry was used to determine scanner-specific dose coefficients for sta... [more] The purpose of this study was to assess the radiation doses of different coronary CTA (CTA) protocols: second-generation dual-source 128-MDCT, first-generation dual-source 64-MDCT, and single-source 64-MDCT. Thermoluminescent dosimetry was used to determine scanner-specific dose coefficients for standard coronary CTA of an anthropomorphic phantom. These coefficients were used to estimate the effective doses (EDs) of retrospectively gated, prospectively triggered, and prospectively triggered high pitch coronary CTA performed at 100 and 120 kV. The coronary CTA protocols used in imaging of 43 patients undergoing dual-source 128-MDCT were analyzed for ED, image quality, and signal-to-noise ratio. Regardless of coronary CTA protocol and CT system, imaging at 100 kV lowered the ED 40-50%. In retrospectively gated 120-kV coronary CTA, the ED ranged from 5.7 to 10.7 mSv and was approximately 50% lower with single-source 64-MDCT than with either DSCT protocol. In prospectively triggered 120-kV coronary CTA, the ED ranged from 3.8 to 4.0 mSv. The lowest ED of all protocols (1.3 mSv) was observed in prospectively triggered high-pitch 100-kV coronary CTA performed with dual-source 128-MDCT. Patient measurements showed similar dose reductions for prospective triggering and low voltage settings without an influence on signal-to-noise ratio or image quality. A combination of prospective triggering with low voltage settings is an effective measure for reducing the ED of coronary CTA to values of 2-4 mSv independent of scanner system. Further dose reduction to nearly 1 mSv can be achieved with high-pitch prospectively triggered coronary CTA.
-
4.85Impact points
Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT studies: balancing patient exposure and image noise.
Investigative radiology. 09/2010; 46(1):64-70.
To establish the essential basis for balancing the dose versus noise trade-off in dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) CT by means of a phantom study. Measurements were performed at a 64-section dual-source system, using the default protocols for DCE imaging (40 scans) of the trunk (current-time product ... [more] To establish the essential basis for balancing the dose versus noise trade-off in dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) CT by means of a phantom study. Measurements were performed at a 64-section dual-source system, using the default protocols for DCE imaging (40 scans) of the trunk (current-time product per scan, 100 mAs; voltage, 120 kVp; pixel size, 0.9 × 0.9 × 8 mm3; CTDIvol per examination, 264 mGy) and head (270 mAs, 80 kVp, 0.45 × 0.45 × 8 mm3, 429 mGy). For 3 representative sections of an anthropomorphic phantom (head, upper abdomen, pelvis) transaxial dose distributions were measured by thermoluminescent dosimeters. The image noise was determined for 5 values of the current-time product (but otherwise identical parameter settings) and 4 pixel resolutions at a water-filled trunk and head phantom. Highest exposures occurred at the periphery of the trunk and head with maximum skin entrance doses of about 300 mGy. Effective doses related to the 3 exposure scenarios were between 4 and 20 mSv, but were not at all predictive of local exposure levels. The image noise was inversely proportional to the square root of the current-time product and, with restrictions, to the pixel size. Noise levels determined for the standard settings were 13.8 HU (trunk) and 4.4 HU (head) and thus comparable with the contrast enhancement typically detected in tumors and ischemic brain tissues, respectively. The opposing requirements of risk and noise limitation in DCE-CT cannot be balanced without substantially reducing the spatial resolution. But even so, local radiation exposures are rather high for a diagnostic procedure. Indications to perform a DCE examination should thus be strictly limited to patients who really benefit from it.
-
4.85Impact points
Dual energy CT of the chest: how about the dose?
Investigative radiology. 06/2010; 45(6):347-53.
New generation Dual Source computed tomography (CT) scanners offer different x-ray spectra for Dual Energy imaging. Yet, an objective, manufacturer independent verification of the dose required for the different spectral combinations is lacking. The aim of this study was to assess dose and image noi... [more] New generation Dual Source computed tomography (CT) scanners offer different x-ray spectra for Dual Energy imaging. Yet, an objective, manufacturer independent verification of the dose required for the different spectral combinations is lacking. The aim of this study was to assess dose and image noise of 2 different Dual Energy CT settings with reference to a standard chest scan and to compare image noise and contrast to noise ratios (CNR). Also, exact effective dose length products (E/DLP) conversion factors were to be established based on the objectively measured dose. An anthropomorphic Alderson phantom was assembled with thermoluminescent detectors (TLD) and its chest was scanned on a Dual Source CT (Siemens Somatom Definition) in dual energy mode at 140 and 80 kVp with 14 x 1.2 mm collimation. The same was performed on another Dual Source CT (Siemens Somatom Definition Flash) at 140 kVp with 0.8 mm tin filter (Sn) and 100 kVp at 128 x 0.6 mm collimation. Reference scans were obtained at 120 kVp with 64 x 0.6 mm collimation at equivalent CT dose index of 5.4 mGy*cm. Syringes filled with water and 17.5 mg iodine/mL were scanned with the same settings. Dose was calculated from the TLD measurements and the dose length products of the scanner. Image noise was measured in the phantom scans and CNR and spectral contrast were determined in the iodine and water samples. E/DLP conversion factors were calculated as ratio between the measured dose form the TLDs and the dose length product given in the patient protocol. The effective dose measured with TLDs was 2.61, 2.69, and 2.70 mSv, respectively, for the 140/80 kVp, the 140 Sn/100 kVp, and the standard 120 kVp scans. Image noise measured in the average images of the phantom scans was 11.0, 10.7, and 9.9 HU (P > 0.05). The CNR of iodine with optimized image blending was 33.4 at 140/80 kVp, 30.7 at 140Sn/100 kVp and 14.6 at 120 kVp. E/DLP conversion factors were 0.0161 mSv/mGy*cm for the 140/80 kVp protocol, 0.0181 mSv/mGy*cm for the Sn140/100 kVp mode and 0.0180 mSv/mGy*cm for the 120 kVp examination. Dual Energy CT is feasible without additional dose. There is no significant difference in image noise, while CNR can be doubled with optimized dual energy CT reconstructions. A restriction in collimation is required for dose-neutrality at 140/80 kVp, whereas this is not necessary at 140 Sn/100 kVp. Thus, CT can be performed routinely in Dual Energy mode without additional dose or compromises in image quality.
-
3.59Impact points
Dose reduction by automatic exposure control in multidetector computed tomography: comparison between measurement and calculation.
European radiology. 12/2008;
The aim of this study was to investigate the potential of dose reduction in multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) by current-modulated automatic exposure control (AEC) and to test the reliability of the dose estimation by the conventional CT dosimetry program CT-EXPO, when an average tube current... [more] The aim of this study was to investigate the potential of dose reduction in multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) by current-modulated automatic exposure control (AEC) and to test the reliability of the dose estimation by the conventional CT dosimetry program CT-EXPO, when an average tube current is used. Phantom measurements were performed at a CT system with 64 detector rows for four representative examination protocols, each without and with current-modulated AEC. Organ and effective doses were measured by thermoluminescence dosimeters (TLD) at an anthropomorphic Alderson phantom and compared with those given by the calculation with CT-EXPO. The application of AEC yielded dose reductions between 27 and 40% (TLD measurements). While good linearity was observed between measured and computed effective dose values both without and with AEC, the organ doses showed large deviations between measurement and calculation. The dose to patients undergoing a MDCT examination can be reduced considerably by applying a current-modulated AEC. Dosimetric algorithms using a constant current-time product provide reliable estimates of the effective dose.
-
2.65Impact points
Radiation exposures of cancer patients from medical X-rays: How relevant are they for individual patients and population exposure?
European journal of radiology. 09/2008;
X-ray procedures have a substantial impact not only on patient care but also on man-made radiation exposure. Since a reliable risk-benefit analysis of medical X-rays can only be performed for diagnosis-related groups of patients, we determined specific exposure data for patients with the ten most co... [more] X-ray procedures have a substantial impact not only on patient care but also on man-made radiation exposure. Since a reliable risk-benefit analysis of medical X-rays can only be performed for diagnosis-related groups of patients, we determined specific exposure data for patients with the ten most common types of cancer. For all patients with the considered cancers undergoing medical X-ray procedures in a maximum-care hospital between 2000 and 2005, patient- and examination-specific data were retrieved from the hospital/radiology information system. From this data, the cumulative 5-year effective dose was estimated for each patient as well as the mean annual effective dose per patient and the mean patient observation time for each cancer site. In total, 151,439 radiographic, fluoroscopic, and CT procedures, carried out in 15,866 cancer patients (age, 62+/-13 years), were evaluated. The mean 5-year cumulative dose varied between 8.6mSv (prostate cancer) and 68.8mSv (pancreas cancer). Due to an increasing use of CT scans, the mean annual effective dose per patient increased from 13.6 to 18.2mSv during the 6-year period. Combining the results obtained in this study for a particular hospital with cancer incidence data for Germany, we estimated that cancer patients having X-ray studies constitute at least 1% of the population but receive more than 10% of the total effective dose related to all medical X-ray procedures performed nationwide per year. A large fraction of this dose is radiobiologically ineffective due to the reduced life expectancy of cancer patients.
-
2.03Impact points
[Cross-sectional imaging in dentomaxillofacial diagnostics: dose comparison of dental MSCT and NewTom 9000 DVT]
RöFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Röntgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin. 06/2008; 180(5):396-401.
PURPOSE: For nonsuperimposed and three-dimensional imaging of jaws and teeth, multislice computer tomography (MSCT) can be performed, or alternatively digital volume tomography as a cone beam technique can be applied. The radiation dose of both procedures should be evaluated with different methods o... [more] PURPOSE: For nonsuperimposed and three-dimensional imaging of jaws and teeth, multislice computer tomography (MSCT) can be performed, or alternatively digital volume tomography as a cone beam technique can be applied. The radiation dose of both procedures should be evaluated with different methods of dose assessment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 4-row MSCT (Volume Zoom Siemens) and a cone beam CT (NewTom QR-DVT 9000) were compared regarding the radiation exposure of the patient during a dental examination. Organ dose and effective dose were estimated by thermoluminescence dosimetry (TLD) using an Alderson-Rando phantom for both devices. In addition the effective dose of MSCT was calculated from the CTDIvol-value at scanner display and by CT-Expo program. RESULTS: The effective dose of MSCT was 0.33 mSv for women (w) and 0.32 mSv for men (m) measured with TLD in the Alderson-Rando phantom, 0.39 / 0.35 mSv (w/m) by CTDI calculation and 0.39 / 0.33 mSv by CT-Expo program. The effective dose of NewTom QR-DVT 9000 from TLD measurement was 0.095 / 0.093 mSv (w/m). CONCLUSION: The radiation exposure of a typical dental examination with a NewTom cone beam DVT is about one third of the MSCT dose. Both techniques, however, moderate patient doses. Dosimetry methods as routinely used for MSCT cannot be applied to cone beam DVT.
-
6.42Impact points
Radiation exposure of patients undergoing whole-body dual-modality 18F-FDG PET/CT examinations.
Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine. 05/2005; 46(4):608-13.
We investigated radiation exposure of patients undergoing whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT examinations at 4 hospitals equipped with different tomographs. METHODS: Patient doses were estimated by using established dose coefficients for 18F-FDG and from thermoluminescent measurements performed on an anthrop... [more] We investigated radiation exposure of patients undergoing whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT examinations at 4 hospitals equipped with different tomographs. METHODS: Patient doses were estimated by using established dose coefficients for 18F-FDG and from thermoluminescent measurements performed on an anthropomorphic whole-body phantom. RESULTS: The most relevant difference between the protocols examined was the incorporation of CT as part of the combined PET/CT examination: Separate low-dose CT scans were acquired at 2 hospitals for attenuation correction of emission data in addition to a contrast-enhanced CT scan for diagnostic evaluation, whereas, at the other sites, contrast-enhanced CT scans were used for both purposes. Nevertheless, the effective dose per PET/CT examination was similar, about 25 mSv. CONCLUSION: The dosimetric concepts presented in this study provide a valuable tool for the optimization of whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT protocols. Further reduction of patient exposure can be achieved by modifications to the existing hardware and software of PET/CT systems.
-
3.59Impact points
Assessment of a theoretical formalism for dose estimation in CT: an anthropomorphic phantom study.
European radiology. 07/2004; 14(7):1275-84.
Dose assessment in computed tomography (CT) is challenging due to the vast variety of CT scanners and imaging protocols in use. In the present study, the accurateness of a theoretical formalism implemented in the PC program CT-EXPO for dose calculation was evaluated by means of phantom measurements.... [more] Dose assessment in computed tomography (CT) is challenging due to the vast variety of CT scanners and imaging protocols in use. In the present study, the accurateness of a theoretical formalism implemented in the PC program CT-EXPO for dose calculation was evaluated by means of phantom measurements. Phantom measurements were performed with four 1-slice, four 4-slice and two 16-slice spiral CT scanners. Firstly, scanner-specific nCTDIw values were measured and compared with the corresponding standard values used for dose calculation. Secondly, effective doses were determined for three CT scans (head, chest and pelvis) performed at each of the ten installations from readings of thermoluminescent dosimeters distributed inside an anthropomorphic Alderson phantom and compared with the corresponding dose values computed with CT-EXPO. Differences between standard and individually measured nCTDIw values were less than 16%. Statistical analysis yielded a highly significant correlation (P < 0.001) between calculated and measured effective doses. The systematic and random uncertainty of the dose values calculated using standard nCTDIw values was about -9 and +/- 11%, respectively. The phantom measurements and model calculations were carried out for a variety of CT scanners and representative scan protocols validate the reliability of the dosimetric formalism considered-at least for patients with a standard body size and a tube voltage of 120 kV selected for the majority of CT scans performed in our study.
-
2.03Impact points
[Low-dose spiral CT of the lung in the follow-up of non-malignant lung disease]
RöFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Röntgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin. 05/2004; 176(4):522-8.
PURPOSE: To assess image quality of chest CT with an 80 to 90 percent dose reduction in follow-up studies of patients with lung disease, dose and image quality of a low-dose protocol was investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A follow-up low-dose CT (ND-CT, 120 kV, 10 mAs/slice, 3 mm slice thickness) ... [more] PURPOSE: To assess image quality of chest CT with an 80 to 90 percent dose reduction in follow-up studies of patients with lung disease, dose and image quality of a low-dose protocol was investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A follow-up low-dose CT (ND-CT, 120 kV, 10 mAs/slice, 3 mm slice thickness) was performed on 35 patients with non-malignant lung disease and compared with the initial standard dose CT (= SD-CT, 100 mAs/slice, 3 or 5 mm slice thickness). The dose was measured by thermo-luminescence in an Alderson phantom. Image quality was assessed by four independent radiologists in six perihilar, central and peripheral lung regions using a 4-point-scale ("very good", "good", "moderate", and "poor"). RESULTS: Effective dose was 0.5 mSv for ND-CT and 4.0 - 5.0 mSv for SD-CT. The ratings "very good"/"good" were given in the perihilar regions in ND-CT 97.5 % versus SD-CT 99.3 % (n. s.), in the central regions in ND-CT 96.4 % versus SD-CT 94.6 % (n. s.), and in the peripheral regions in ND-CT 70.0 % versus SD-CT 88.2 % (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Follow-up CT of pulmonary structures in patients with chronic lung disease can be performed with substantial dose reduction. A decrease of image quality may result in peripheral lung regions.
-
3.59Impact points
Radiation exposure in multi-slice versus single-slice spiral CT: results of a nationwide survey.
European radiology. 09/2003; 13(8):1979-91.
Multi-slice (MS) technology increases the efficacy of CT procedures and offers new promising applications. The expanding use of MSCT, however, may result in an increase in both frequency of procedures and levels of patient exposure. It was, therefore, the aim of this study to gain an overview of MSC... [more] Multi-slice (MS) technology increases the efficacy of CT procedures and offers new promising applications. The expanding use of MSCT, however, may result in an increase in both frequency of procedures and levels of patient exposure. It was, therefore, the aim of this study to gain an overview of MSCT examinations conducted in Germany in 2001. All MSCT facilities were requested to provide information about 14 standard examinations with respect to scan parameters and frequency. Based on this data, dosimetric quantities were estimated using an experimentally validated formalism. Results are compared with those of a previous survey for single-slice (SS) spiral CT scanners. According to the data provided for 39 dual- and 73 quad-slice systems, the average annual number of patients examined at MSCT is markedly higher than that examined at SSCT scanners (5500 vs 3500). The average effective dose to patients was changed from 7.4 mSv at single-slice to 5.5 mSv and 8.1 mSv at dual- and quad-slice scanners, respectively. There is a considerable potential for dose reduction at quad-slice systems by an optimisation of scan protocols and better education of the personnel. To avoid an increase in the collective effective dose from CT procedures, a clear medical justification is required in each case.
-
2.03Impact points
[Assessment of the effective dose for routine protocols in conventional CT, electron beam CT and coronary angiography]
RöFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Röntgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin. 02/1999; 170(1):99-104.
PURPOSE: To compare the effective dose applied by sequential CT (SEQ), spiral CT (SCT), electron beam CT (EBT) and coronary angiography for investigations of the chest, abdomen and the heart. METHODS: The Alderson Phantom was used to compare the effective dose for all modalities. In addition, the ef... [more] PURPOSE: To compare the effective dose applied by sequential CT (SEQ), spiral CT (SCT), electron beam CT (EBT) and coronary angiography for investigations of the chest, abdomen and the heart. METHODS: The Alderson Phantom was used to compare the effective dose for all modalities. In addition, the effective dose for conventional CT (SEQ and SCT) was estimated with a mathematical phantom. RESULTS: For CT investigation of the chest and abdomen the dose was highest for the EBT (11 mSv and 25 mSv, respectively) and slightly lower for the SEQ (7.8 mSv and 21.5 mSv, respectively), whereas spiral CT required the least dose (5.3 mSv and 8.8 mSv, respectively). For coronary calcium screening (0.8 mSv) and EBT coronary angiography (1.7 mSv) the dose was lower than for coronary catheter angiography (3.3 mSv). For conventional CT the difference between the effective dose derived by the mathematical phantom and by the Alderson phantom was 2% to 20%. CONCLUSIONS: For investigations of the chest and abdomen the effective dose applied by SCT is significantly lower than that with EBT and SEQ. For investigation of the coronary arteries the effective dose applied by EBT is lower than that for coronary catheter angiography.
-
[Assessment of the effective dose for routine protocols in conventional CT, electron beam CT and coronary angiography]
Rofo. 170(1):99-104.
PURPOSE: To compare the effective dose applied by sequential CT (SEQ), spiral CT (SCT), electron beam CT (EBT) and coronary angiography for investigations of the chest, abdomen and the heart. METHODS: The Alderson Phantom was used to compare the effective dose for all modalities. In addition, the ef... [more] PURPOSE: To compare the effective dose applied by sequential CT (SEQ), spiral CT (SCT), electron beam CT (EBT) and coronary angiography for investigations of the chest, abdomen and the heart. METHODS: The Alderson Phantom was used to compare the effective dose for all modalities. In addition, the effective dose for conventional CT (SEQ and SCT) was estimated with a mathematical phantom. RESULTS: For CT investigation of the chest and abdomen the dose was highest for the EBT (11 mSv and 25 mSv, respectively) and slightly lower for the SEQ (7.8 mSv and 21.5 mSv, respectively), whereas spiral CT required the least dose (5.3 mSv and 8.8 mSv, respectively). For coronary calcium screening (0.8 mSv) and EBT coronary angiography (1.7 mSv) the dose was lower than for coronary catheter angiography (3.3 mSv). For conventional CT the difference between the effective dose derived by the mathematical phantom and by the Alderson phantom was 2% to 20%. CONCLUSIONS: For investigations of the chest and abdomen the effective dose applied by SCT is significantly lower than that with EBT and SEQ. For investigation of the coronary arteries the effective dose applied by EBT is lower than that for coronary catheter angiography.
-
Radiation dose at coronary CT angiography: second-generation dual-source CT versus single-source 64-MDCT and first-generation dual-source CT
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 196(5):W550-7.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the radiation doses of different coronary CTA (CTA) protocols: second-generation dual-source 128-MDCT, first-generation dual-source 64-MDCT, and single-source 64-MDCT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thermoluminescent dosimetry was used to determine scanner-... [more] OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the radiation doses of different coronary CTA (CTA) protocols: second-generation dual-source 128-MDCT, first-generation dual-source 64-MDCT, and single-source 64-MDCT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thermoluminescent dosimetry was used to determine scanner-specific dose coefficients for standard coronary CTA of an anthropomorphic phantom. These coefficients were used to estimate the effective doses (EDs) of retrospectively gated, prospectively triggered, and prospectively triggered high pitch coronary CTA performed at 100 and 120 kV. The coronary CTA protocols used in imaging of 43 patients undergoing dual-source 128-MDCT were analyzed for ED, image quality, and signal-to-noise ratio. RESULTS: Regardless of coronary CTA protocol and CT system, imaging at 100 kV lowered the ED 40-50%. In retrospectively gated 120-kV coronary CTA, the ED ranged from 5.7 to 10.7 mSv and was approximately 50% lower with single-source 64-MDCT than with either DSCT protocol. In prospectively triggered 120-kV coronary CTA, the ED ranged from 3.8 to 4.0 mSv. The lowest ED of all protocols (1.3 mSv) was observed in prospectively triggered high-pitch 100-kV coronary CTA performed with dual-source 128-MDCT. Patient measurements showed similar dose reductions for prospective triggering and low voltage settings without an influence on signal-to-noise ratio or image quality. CONCLUSION: A combination of prospective triggering with low voltage settings is an effective measure for reducing the ED of coronary CTA to values of 2-4 mSv independent of scanner system. Further dose reduction to nearly 1 mSv can be achieved with high-pitch prospectively triggered coronary CTA.
-
Radiation dose at coronary CT angiography: second-generation dual-source CT versus single-source 64-MDCT and first-generation dual-source CT
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 196(5):W550-7.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the radiation doses of different coronary CTA (CTA) protocols: second-generation dual-source 128-MDCT, first-generation dual-source 64-MDCT, and single-source 64-MDCT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thermoluminescent dosimetry was used to determine scanner-... [more] OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the radiation doses of different coronary CTA (CTA) protocols: second-generation dual-source 128-MDCT, first-generation dual-source 64-MDCT, and single-source 64-MDCT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thermoluminescent dosimetry was used to determine scanner-specific dose coefficients for standard coronary CTA of an anthropomorphic phantom. These coefficients were used to estimate the effective doses (EDs) of retrospectively gated, prospectively triggered, and prospectively triggered high pitch coronary CTA performed at 100 and 120 kV. The coronary CTA protocols used in imaging of 43 patients undergoing dual-source 128-MDCT were analyzed for ED, image quality, and signal-to-noise ratio. RESULTS: Regardless of coronary CTA protocol and CT system, imaging at 100 kV lowered the ED 40-50%. In retrospectively gated 120-kV coronary CTA, the ED ranged from 5.7 to 10.7 mSv and was approximately 50% lower with single-source 64-MDCT than with either DSCT protocol. In prospectively triggered 120-kV coronary CTA, the ED ranged from 3.8 to 4.0 mSv. The lowest ED of all protocols (1.3 mSv) was observed in prospectively triggered high-pitch 100-kV coronary CTA performed with dual-source 128-MDCT. Patient measurements showed similar dose reductions for prospective triggering and low voltage settings without an influence on signal-to-noise ratio or image quality. CONCLUSION: A combination of prospective triggering with low voltage settings is an effective measure for reducing the ED of coronary CTA to values of 2-4 mSv independent of scanner system. Further dose reduction to nearly 1 mSv can be achieved with high-pitch prospectively triggered coronary CTA.
-
[Assessment of the effective dose for routine protocols in conventional CT, electron beam CT and coronary angiography]
Rofo. 170(1):99-104.
PURPOSE: To compare the effective dose applied by sequential CT (SEQ), spiral CT (SCT), electron beam CT (EBT) and coronary angiography for investigations of the chest, abdomen and the heart. METHODS: The Alderson Phantom was used to compare the effective dose for all modalities. In addition, the ef... [more] PURPOSE: To compare the effective dose applied by sequential CT (SEQ), spiral CT (SCT), electron beam CT (EBT) and coronary angiography for investigations of the chest, abdomen and the heart. METHODS: The Alderson Phantom was used to compare the effective dose for all modalities. In addition, the effective dose for conventional CT (SEQ and SCT) was estimated with a mathematical phantom. RESULTS: For CT investigation of the chest and abdomen the dose was highest for the EBT (11 mSv and 25 mSv, respectively) and slightly lower for the SEQ (7.8 mSv and 21.5 mSv, respectively), whereas spiral CT required the least dose (5.3 mSv and 8.8 mSv, respectively). For coronary calcium screening (0.8 mSv) and EBT coronary angiography (1.7 mSv) the dose was lower than for coronary catheter angiography (3.3 mSv). For conventional CT the difference between the effective dose derived by the mathematical phantom and by the Alderson phantom was 2% to 20%. CONCLUSIONS: For investigations of the chest and abdomen the effective dose applied by SCT is significantly lower than that with EBT and SEQ. For investigation of the coronary arteries the effective dose applied by EBT is lower than that for coronary catheter angiography.
Following (3)
-
Georg Stamm
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover -
Thorsten R C Johnson
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München -
Ullrich Mueller-Lisse
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Topics (4)
