Publications (73) View all
-
Article: Outcome of Patients Treated With a Single-Fraction Dose of Palliative Radiation for Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: PURPOSE: Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) is a radiosensitive tumor. Presently, treatment with radiation is given in multiple fractions. The current literature lacks data that support single-fraction treatment for CTCL. This retrospective review assesses the clinical response in patients treated with a single fraction of radiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This study reviewed the records of 58 patients with CTCL, primarily mycosis fungoides, treated with a single fraction of palliative radiation therapy (RT) between October 1991 and January 2011. Patient and tumor characteristics were reviewed. Response rates were compared using Fisher's exact test and multiple logistic regressions. Survival rates were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cost-effectiveness analysis was performed to assess the cost of a single vs a multifractionated treatment regimen. RESULTS: Two hundred seventy individual lesions were treated, with the majority (97%) treated with ≥700 cGy; mean follow-up was 41.3 months (range, 3-180 months). Response rate by lesion was assessed, with a complete response (CR) in 255 (94.4%) lesions, a partial response in 10 (3.7%) lesions, a partial response converted to a CR after a second treatment in 4 (1.5%) lesions, and no response in 1 (0.4%) lesion. The CR in lower extremity lesions was lower than in other sites (P=.0016). Lesions treated with photons had lower CR than those treated with electrons (P=.017). Patients with lesions exhibiting large cell transformation and tumor morphology had lower CR (P=.04 and P=.035, respectively). Immunophenotype did not impact response rate (P=.23). Overall survival was significantly lower for patients with Sézary syndrome (P=.0003) and erythroderma (P<.0001). The cost of multifractionated radiation was >200% higher than that for single-fraction radiation. CONCLUSIONS: A single fraction of 700 cGy-800 cGy provides excellent palliation for CTCL lesions and is cost effective and convenient for the patient.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics 07/2012; · 4.59 Impact Factor -
Article: Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma/leukemia
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Effective treatment for cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCL) requires an accurate and specific diagnosis based on the clinical presentation combined with evaluation of the histopathology, immunophenotyping, and gene rearrangement studies. Careful clinical and pathologic evaluation in centers familiar with the diverse forms of CTCL is most valuable for determining treatment options. The goals of treatment in mycosis fungoides (MF), which afflicts more than 50% of patients with CTCL, are the relief of symptoms and improvement in cosmetics. Despite some uncontrolled clinical trial results that have been reported to suggest “cures” in this disease, the general perception remains that this disease is not curable with standard therapies available today. Treatment is divided into topical (skin-directed) and systemic therapy. The most active systemic agent for the treatment of MF remains interferon-α, although many new modalities have recently been approved for the treatment of CTCL.Current Treatment Options in Oncology 04/2012; 1(1):43-50. · 2.68 Impact Factor -
Article: Human T-cell lymphotropic-I-associated leukemia/lymphoma
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Human T-cell lymphotropic virus-I (HTLV-I)-related adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATL) is a model disease for proof of viral oncogenesis. HTLV-I infection is endemic in southern Japan and the Caribbean basin, and occurs sporadically in Africa, Central and South America, the Middle East, and the southeastern United States. ATL occurs in only 2% to 4% of HTLV-I-infected people [1-3]. When it does occur, it is usually aggressive and difficult to treat; most people survive for less than 1 year [1-3]. Combination chemotherapy with cytotoxic agents has yielded complete response rates of 20% to 45%, but responses usually last only a few months [3]. Recently, novel treatments, such as monoclonal antibodies directed at the interleukin-2 receptor and the combination of interferon alfa and zidovudine, have been shown to be active in the treatment of patients with ATL. A small percentage of patients achieve long-lasting remissions [2,3].Current Treatment Options in Oncology 04/2012; 2(4):291-300. · 2.68 Impact Factor -
Article: Testicular cancer.
Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network: JNCCN 04/2012; 10(4):502-35. · 4.41 Impact Factor -
Article: Cutaneous T-cell lymphomas: a review of new discoveries and treatments.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Treatment regimens of patients with CTCL vary widely based on clinician preference and patient tolerance. Skin directed therapies are recommended for patients with early stage IA and IB MF, with combinations used in refractory cases. While no regimen has been proven to prolong survival in advanced stages, immunomodulatory regimens should be used initially to reduce the need for cytotoxic therapies. In more advanced stages of disease, treatment efforts should strive for palliation and improvement of quality of life. With many new therapies and strategies on the horizon, the future looks promising for CTCL patients. Unfortunately, other than allogeneic HCT, there are no potential curative therapies for CTCL. Clinical trials are currently underway to identify new therapies to improve quality of life for patients, and researchers are hard at work to identify novel pathways and genes for prognostication and as targets for therapies. Importantly, collaborative clinical trials to enhance rates of accrual need to be conducted, and improved interpretation of data via standardizing end points and response criteria should be an emphasis. Recently, the International Society for Cutaneous Lymphomas (ISCL), the United States Cutaneous Lymphoma Consortium (USCLC), and the Cutaneous Lymphoma Task Force of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) met to develop consensus guidelines to facilitate collaboration on clinical trials. These proposed guidelines consist of: recommendations for standardizing general protocol design; a scoring system for assessing tumor burden in skin, lymph nodes, blood, and viscera; definition of response in skin, nodes, blood, and viscera; a composite global response score; and a definition of end points. Although these guidelines were generated by consensus panels, they have not been prospectively or retrospectively validated through analysis of large patient cohorts.Current Treatment Options in Oncology 03/2012; 13(1):102-21. · 2.68 Impact Factor
