Thomas Sternsdorf

Ph.D.
Forschungsinstitut Kinderkrebs-Zentrum-Hamburg

Topics (18) View all

Skills (7)

Research experience

  • Jul 2009–
    present
    Research: Group Leader
    Forschungsinstitut Kinderkrebs-Zentrum-Hamburg
    Germany · Hamburg
    We are working on leukemogenesis, using Acute promyelocytc Leukemia (APL) as a model disease. Our main interest are the cellular PML nuclear bodies and their associated proteins.
  • Feb 2000–
    Jun 2009
    Research: Salk Institute
    Salk Institute · Gene Expression Laboratory · Ronald M. Evans
    USA · La Jolla
    Working on Leukemogenesis by RAR fusion oncoproteins
  • Jul 1997–
    Jan 2000
    Research: Universität Hamburg
    Heinrich-Pette Institute for Experimnetal Virology and Immunology · Allgemeine Virologie · Hans Will
    Germany · Hamburg
    Working on PML Nuclear Bodies, SUMOylation and Leukemia

Education

  • Nov 1992–
    Jul 1997
    Universität Hamburg
    "Untersuchungen zu Autoantigenität, Struktur und Funktion von PML- und Sp100-assoziierten Kerndomänen" · Dr. rer.nat./Ph.D.
    Germany · Hamburg
  • Nov 1985–
    Jun 1992
    Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
    Biology · Diploma
    Germany · Muenchen

Other

  • Languages
    Germman (native)
    English (written and spoken, fluent)
    Spanish (basic)
    Latin (good)

Questions and Answers (9) View all

  • Answer added in Cancer Biology
    18 What kind of phenotype is this?
    By Xiarong Shi · Yale University
    Thomas Sternsdorf · Forschungsinstitut Kinderkrebs-Zentrum-Hamburg
    Here my impression: the original cells seem to have contact inhibition, which the transduced cells seem to have lost. They seem to be more transformed... [more]
  • Answer added in Cancer Biology
    20 Long term proliferation assays
    By Luz Jubierre Zapater · VHIR Vall d’Hebron Research Institute
    Thomas Sternsdorf · Forschungsinstitut Kinderkrebs-Zentrum-Hamburg
    We are doing an assay using primary murine bone marrow cells, seeding them in cytokine-containing growth medium. With primary cells it is essential to... [more]
  • Question asked in Chromatin
    Open Histone variants ChIP?
    Anyone experienced in H3.3 ChIP? I will be using the MIllipore Ab (in western it seemed way better than the Abcam one: one nice strong distinct band i... [more]
    By Thomas Sternsdorf · Forschungsinstitut Kinderkrebs-Zentrum-Hamburg
  • Answer added in Cell Culture
    13 Expression of prokaryote genes in eukaryotes.
    By Jeevan Nathan · Putra University, Malaysia
    Thomas Sternsdorf · Forschungsinstitut Kinderkrebs-Zentrum-Hamburg
    Definetly try 293T! they do very well for protein expression. I would not take growth of resistant cells as equivalent to transfection efficiency!! Tr... [more]

Publications (29) View all

  • Source
    Article: Transcriptional activation of the adenoviral genome is mediated by capsid protein VI.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Gene expression of DNA viruses requires nuclear import of the viral genome. Human Adenoviruses (Ads), like most DNA viruses, encode factors within early transcription units promoting their own gene expression and counteracting cellular antiviral defense mechanisms. The cellular transcriptional repressor Daxx prevents viral gene expression through the assembly of repressive chromatin remodeling complexes targeting incoming viral genomes. However, it has remained unclear how initial transcriptional activation of the adenoviral genome is achieved. Here we show that Daxx mediated repression of the immediate early Ad E1A promoter is efficiently counteracted by the capsid protein VI. This requires a conserved PPxY motif in protein VI. Capsid proteins from other DNA viruses were also shown to activate the Ad E1A promoter independent of Ad gene expression and support virus replication. Our results show how Ad entry is connected to transcriptional activation of their genome in the nucleus. Our data further suggest a common principle for genome activation of DNA viruses by counteracting Daxx related repressive mechanisms through virion proteins.
    PLoS Pathogens 02/2012; 8(2):e1002549. · 9.13 Impact Factor
  • Article: Targeting expression of the leukemogenic PML-RARα fusion protein by lentiviral vector-mediated small interfering RNA results in leukemic cell differentiation and apoptosis.
    Simone V Ward, Thomas Sternsdorf, Niels-Bjarne Woods
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) results from a chromosomal translocation that gives rise to the leukemogenic fusion protein PML-RARα (promyelocytic leukemia-retinoic acid α receptor). Differentiation of leukemic cells and complete remission of APL are achieved by treatment of patients with pharmacological doses of all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA), making APL a model disease for differentiation therapy. However, because patients are resistant to further treatment with ATRA on relapse, it is necessary to develop alternative treatment strategies to specifically target APL. We therefore sought to develop a treatment strategy based on lentiviral vector-mediated delivery of small interfering RNA (siRNA) that specifically targets the breakpoint region of PML-RARα. Unlike treatment with ATRA, which resulted in differentiation of leukemic NB4 cells, delivery of siRNA targeting PML-RARα into NB4 cells resulted in both differentiation and apoptosis, consistent with the specific knockdown of PML-RARα. Intraperitoneal injection of NB4 cells transduced with lentiviral vectors delivering PML-RARα-specific siRNA but not control siRNA prevented development of disease in nonobese diabetic/severe combined immunodeficient (NOD/SCID) mice. Taken together, these results indicate that development of PML-RARα-specific siRNA may represent a promising treatment strategy for ATRA-resistant APL.
    Human gene therapy 08/2011; 22(12):1593-8. · 4.20 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Article: Forced retinoic acid receptor alpha homodimers prime mice for APL-like leukemia.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: RARA becomes an acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) oncogene by fusion with any of five translocation partners. Unlike RARalpha, the fusion proteins homodimerize, which may be central to oncogenic activation. This model was tested by replacing PML with dimerization domains from p50NFkappaB (p50-RARalpha) or the rapamycin-sensitive dimerizing peptide of FKBP12 (F3-RARalpha). The X-RARalpha fusions recapitulated in vitro activities of PML-RARalpha. For F3-RARalpha, these properties were rapamycin sensitive. Although in vivo the artificial fusions alone are poor initiators of leukemia, p50-RARalpha readily cooperates with an activated mutant CDw131 to induce APL-like disease. These results demonstrate that the dimerization interface of RARalpha fusion partners is a critical element in APL pathogenesis while pointing to other features of PML for enhancing penetrance and progression.
    Cancer Cell 03/2006; 9(2):81-94. · 26.57 Impact Factor
  • Article: Regulation of MEF2 by histone deacetylase 4- and SIRT1 deacetylase-mediated lysine modifications.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The class II deacetylase histone deacetylase 4 (HDAC4) negatively regulates the transcription factor MEF2. HDAC4 is believed to repress MEF2 transcriptional activity by binding to MEF2 and catalyzing local histone deacetylation. Here we report that HDAC4 also controls MEF2 by a novel SUMO E3 ligase activity. We show that HDAC4 interacts with the SUMO E2 conjugating enzyme Ubc9 and is itself sumoylated. The overexpression of HDAC4 leads to prominent MEF2 sumoylation in vivo, whereas recombinant HDAC4 stimulates MEF2 sumoylation in a reconstituted system in vitro. Importantly, HDAC4 promotes sumoylation on a lysine residue that is also subject to acetylation by a MEF2 coactivator, the acetyltransferase CBP, suggesting a possible interplay between acetylation and sumoylation in regulating MEF2 activity. Indeed, MEF2 acetylation is correlated with MEF2 activation and dynamically induced upon muscle cell differentiation, while sumoylation inhibits MEF2 transcriptional activity. Unexpectedly, we found that HDAC4 does not function as a MEF2 deacetylase. Instead, the NAD+-dependent deacetylase SIRT1 can potently induce MEF2 deacetylation. Our studies reveal a novel regulation of MEF2 transcriptional activity by two distinct classes of deacetylases that affect MEF2 sumoylation and acetylation.
    Molecular and Cellular Biology 11/2005; 25(19):8456-64. · 5.53 Impact Factor
  • Article: Small ubiquitin-related modifiers: A novel and independent class of autoantigens in primary biliary cirrhosis.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Serum autoantibodies against components of nuclear dots (anti-NDs), namely PML and Sp100, are specifically detected in 20% to 30% of patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). Although anti-ND antibodies are nonpathogenic, the mechanisms that lead to this unique reactivity are critical to understanding the loss of immune tolerance in PBC. Importantly, Sp100 and PML are both covalently linked to small ubiquitin-related modifiers (SUMOs). Therefore, we investigated whether SUMO proteins are independent autoantigens in PBC and studied 99 PBC sera samples for reactivity against NDs, PML, and Sp100, as well as against SUMO-2 and SUMO-1 recombinant proteins. Autoantibodies against SUMO-2 and SUMO-1 were found in 42% and 15% of anti-ND-positive PBC sera, respectively. Anti-SUMO reactivity was not observed in anti-ND-negative sera. Anti-SUMO-2 autoantibodies were found in 58% of sera containing autoantibodies against both PML and Sp100 and were detected exclusively in sera containing anti-Sp100 autoantibodies. In conclusion, SUMO proteins constitute a novel and independent class of autoantigens in PBC. Furthermore, we believe our data emphasize the post-translational modification of lysine by either lipoylation in the case of AMA or SUMOylation in the case of specific anti-ND autoantibodies as the pivotal site for autoantibody generation in PBC.
    Hepatology 04/2005; 41(3):609-16. · 11.66 Impact Factor

Following (25) See all

Followers (19) See all