Skills (7)
-
7 Questions562 Followers
-
3 Questions41 Followers
-
0 Questions2 Followers
-
765 Questions74372 Followers
-
164 Questions11357 Followers
-
72 Questions47332 Followers
Research experience
-
Jul 2009–
presentResearch: Group Leader
Forschungsinstitut Kinderkrebs-Zentrum-HamburgGermany · HamburgWe are working on leukemogenesis, using Acute promyelocytc Leukemia (APL) as a model disease. Our main interest are the cellular PML nuclear bodies and their associated proteins. -
Feb 2000–
Jun 2009Research: Salk Institute
Salk Institute · Gene Expression Laboratory · Ronald M. EvansUSA · La JollaWorking on Leukemogenesis by RAR fusion oncoproteins -
Jul 1997–
Jan 2000Research: Universität Hamburg
Heinrich-Pette Institute for Experimnetal Virology and Immunology · Allgemeine Virologie · Hans WillGermany · HamburgWorking on PML Nuclear Bodies, SUMOylation and Leukemia
Education
-
Nov 1992–
Jul 1997Universität Hamburg
"Untersuchungen zu Autoantigenität, Struktur und Funktion von PML- und Sp100-assoziierten Kerndomänen" · Dr. rer.nat./Ph.D.Germany · Hamburg -
Nov 1985–
Jun 1992Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Biology · DiplomaGermany · Muenchen
Other
-
LanguagesGermman (native)
English (written and spoken, fluent)
Spanish (basic)
Latin (good)
Questions and Answers (9) View all
-
Answer added in Cancer Biology18 What kind of phenotype is this?By Xiarong Shi · Yale UniversityThomas Sternsdorf · Forschungsinstitut Kinderkrebs-Zentrum-HamburgHere my impression: the original cells seem to have contact inhibition, which the transduced cells seem to have lost. They seem to be more transformed... [more]Here my impression: the original cells seem to have contact inhibition, which the transduced cells seem to have lost. They seem to be more transformed (more irregular criss-cross growth). To test this I would suggest to repeat in a cell line with robust contact inhibition, such as Rat-1. 3T3 is typically used for transformation assays and foci formation. There is a lot of literature out there. You could also use primary cells. I would expect that they might become immortalized. I have some 293-HEK cells showing such a phenomenon spontaneously when they were cultured for too long. In general, using cell lines for these type of experiments is maybe not the best way. I really would suggest primary cells. Cbl is also a proto-oncogene. Are you using wildtype or a mutant?Following
-
Answer added in Cancer Biology20 Long term proliferation assaysBy Luz Jubierre Zapater · VHIR Vall d’Hebron Research InstituteThomas Sternsdorf · Forschungsinstitut Kinderkrebs-Zentrum-HamburgWe are doing an assay using primary murine bone marrow cells, seeding them in cytokine-containing growth medium. With primary cells it is essential to... [more]We are doing an assay using primary murine bone marrow cells, seeding them in cytokine-containing growth medium. With primary cells it is essential to be aware that subculturing will alter your cells. This might not be so much of an issue for cell lines, which went through a long history of subculturing anyway. We treat our cells as suspension cells, seed 100ul in 400ul medium (24-Well format) grow for three days, split 1:5 (100ul into new 400ul). We FACS-analyze the rest in a defined volume at high speed for a constant time (!), thereby getting an approximate cell count. The newly diluted cells will incubate (and proliferate) again for another 3 days, then repeat as above. You do not want your cultue to overgrow (as this will give an ugly dent in the growth curve, until cells recover), neither do you want to overdilute your cells. So it will be necessary to adjust the splitting ratio/volumes and time intervals according to the growth specifications of your particular cells. In our case, we rapidly loose adherent cells, but for our purpose this is not relevant. Having suspension cells makes life a lot easier! For proper quantification, you may have to choose a more accurate counting method (for instance adding a defined number of fluorescent beads to the cell suspension to normalize the throughput-volume of your FACS. BD sells those!). Just to compare two conditions should be easy with this setup. You may want to consider doing triplicates for better statistics. Good luck, hope this is of use for you! Take care!, Thomas :-)Following
-
Question asked in ChromatinOpen Histone variants ChIP?Anyone experienced in H3.3 ChIP? I will be using the MIllipore Ab (in western it seemed way better than the Abcam one: one nice strong distinct band i... [more]Anyone experienced in H3.3 ChIP? I will be using the MIllipore Ab (in western it seemed way better than the Abcam one: one nice strong distinct band in my cell line of interest!) and now I am in need for good positive and negative control genomic regions.By Thomas Sternsdorf · Forschungsinstitut Kinderkrebs-Zentrum-HamburgFollowing
-
Answer added in Cell Culture13 Expression of prokaryote genes in eukaryotes.By Jeevan Nathan · Putra University, MalaysiaThomas Sternsdorf · Forschungsinstitut Kinderkrebs-Zentrum-HamburgDefinetly try 293T! they do very well for protein expression. I would not take growth of resistant cells as equivalent to transfection efficiency!! Tr... [more]Definetly try 293T! they do very well for protein expression. I would not take growth of resistant cells as equivalent to transfection efficiency!! Try to transfect a CMV-GFP as a control and take a look with an IFL microscope, thats the fastest way, ideally, you want to see much more than 50% green cells. (for virus packaging I always say: virtually every cell should look green, if not , redo the transfection, its not worthwhile to use the supernatant. Did you titrate the antibiotic with nontransfected controls? If all fails you might have to think about Baculovirus and insect cells. The system is commercially availabe: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Five_cells http://www.biocompare.com/19399-Insect-Cell-Lines/79006-High-Five-Cells-SFM-Adapted/ But first: try 293T!!!! We use Fugene HD and it works like a dream. Good luck and don't despair. You will get there eventually!!! Thomas :-)Following
Publications (29) View all
-
Article: Transcriptional activation of the adenoviral genome is mediated by capsid protein VI.
Sabrina Schreiner, Ruben Martinez, Peter Groitl, Fabienne Rayne, Remi Vaillant, Peter Wimmer, Guillaume Bossis, Thomas Sternsdorf, Lisa Marcinowski, Zsolt Ruzsics, Thomas Dobner, Harald Wodrich[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Gene expression of DNA viruses requires nuclear import of the viral genome. Human Adenoviruses (Ads), like most DNA viruses, encode factors within early transcription units promoting their own gene expression and counteracting cellular antiviral defense mechanisms. The cellular transcriptional repressor Daxx prevents viral gene expression through the assembly of repressive chromatin remodeling complexes targeting incoming viral genomes. However, it has remained unclear how initial transcriptional activation of the adenoviral genome is achieved. Here we show that Daxx mediated repression of the immediate early Ad E1A promoter is efficiently counteracted by the capsid protein VI. This requires a conserved PPxY motif in protein VI. Capsid proteins from other DNA viruses were also shown to activate the Ad E1A promoter independent of Ad gene expression and support virus replication. Our results show how Ad entry is connected to transcriptional activation of their genome in the nucleus. Our data further suggest a common principle for genome activation of DNA viruses by counteracting Daxx related repressive mechanisms through virion proteins.PLoS Pathogens 02/2012; 8(2):e1002549. · 9.13 Impact Factor -
Article: Targeting expression of the leukemogenic PML-RARα fusion protein by lentiviral vector-mediated small interfering RNA results in leukemic cell differentiation and apoptosis.
Simone V Ward, Thomas Sternsdorf, Niels-Bjarne Woods[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) results from a chromosomal translocation that gives rise to the leukemogenic fusion protein PML-RARα (promyelocytic leukemia-retinoic acid α receptor). Differentiation of leukemic cells and complete remission of APL are achieved by treatment of patients with pharmacological doses of all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA), making APL a model disease for differentiation therapy. However, because patients are resistant to further treatment with ATRA on relapse, it is necessary to develop alternative treatment strategies to specifically target APL. We therefore sought to develop a treatment strategy based on lentiviral vector-mediated delivery of small interfering RNA (siRNA) that specifically targets the breakpoint region of PML-RARα. Unlike treatment with ATRA, which resulted in differentiation of leukemic NB4 cells, delivery of siRNA targeting PML-RARα into NB4 cells resulted in both differentiation and apoptosis, consistent with the specific knockdown of PML-RARα. Intraperitoneal injection of NB4 cells transduced with lentiviral vectors delivering PML-RARα-specific siRNA but not control siRNA prevented development of disease in nonobese diabetic/severe combined immunodeficient (NOD/SCID) mice. Taken together, these results indicate that development of PML-RARα-specific siRNA may represent a promising treatment strategy for ATRA-resistant APL.Human gene therapy 08/2011; 22(12):1593-8. · 4.20 Impact Factor -
SourceAvailable from: Thomas Sternsdorf
Article: Forced retinoic acid receptor alpha homodimers prime mice for APL-like leukemia.
Thomas Sternsdorf, Vernon T Phan, Mei Lin Maunakea, Corinne B Ocampo, Jastinder Sohal, Angela Silletto, Francesco Galimi, Michelle M Le Beau, Ronald M Evans, Scott C Kogan[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: RARA becomes an acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) oncogene by fusion with any of five translocation partners. Unlike RARalpha, the fusion proteins homodimerize, which may be central to oncogenic activation. This model was tested by replacing PML with dimerization domains from p50NFkappaB (p50-RARalpha) or the rapamycin-sensitive dimerizing peptide of FKBP12 (F3-RARalpha). The X-RARalpha fusions recapitulated in vitro activities of PML-RARalpha. For F3-RARalpha, these properties were rapamycin sensitive. Although in vivo the artificial fusions alone are poor initiators of leukemia, p50-RARalpha readily cooperates with an activated mutant CDw131 to induce APL-like disease. These results demonstrate that the dimerization interface of RARalpha fusion partners is a critical element in APL pathogenesis while pointing to other features of PML for enhancing penetrance and progression.Cancer Cell 03/2006; 9(2):81-94. · 26.57 Impact Factor -
Article: Regulation of MEF2 by histone deacetylase 4- and SIRT1 deacetylase-mediated lysine modifications.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The class II deacetylase histone deacetylase 4 (HDAC4) negatively regulates the transcription factor MEF2. HDAC4 is believed to repress MEF2 transcriptional activity by binding to MEF2 and catalyzing local histone deacetylation. Here we report that HDAC4 also controls MEF2 by a novel SUMO E3 ligase activity. We show that HDAC4 interacts with the SUMO E2 conjugating enzyme Ubc9 and is itself sumoylated. The overexpression of HDAC4 leads to prominent MEF2 sumoylation in vivo, whereas recombinant HDAC4 stimulates MEF2 sumoylation in a reconstituted system in vitro. Importantly, HDAC4 promotes sumoylation on a lysine residue that is also subject to acetylation by a MEF2 coactivator, the acetyltransferase CBP, suggesting a possible interplay between acetylation and sumoylation in regulating MEF2 activity. Indeed, MEF2 acetylation is correlated with MEF2 activation and dynamically induced upon muscle cell differentiation, while sumoylation inhibits MEF2 transcriptional activity. Unexpectedly, we found that HDAC4 does not function as a MEF2 deacetylase. Instead, the NAD+-dependent deacetylase SIRT1 can potently induce MEF2 deacetylation. Our studies reveal a novel regulation of MEF2 transcriptional activity by two distinct classes of deacetylases that affect MEF2 sumoylation and acetylation.Molecular and Cellular Biology 11/2005; 25(19):8456-64. · 5.53 Impact Factor -
Article: Small ubiquitin-related modifiers: A novel and independent class of autoantigens in primary biliary cirrhosis.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Serum autoantibodies against components of nuclear dots (anti-NDs), namely PML and Sp100, are specifically detected in 20% to 30% of patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). Although anti-ND antibodies are nonpathogenic, the mechanisms that lead to this unique reactivity are critical to understanding the loss of immune tolerance in PBC. Importantly, Sp100 and PML are both covalently linked to small ubiquitin-related modifiers (SUMOs). Therefore, we investigated whether SUMO proteins are independent autoantigens in PBC and studied 99 PBC sera samples for reactivity against NDs, PML, and Sp100, as well as against SUMO-2 and SUMO-1 recombinant proteins. Autoantibodies against SUMO-2 and SUMO-1 were found in 42% and 15% of anti-ND-positive PBC sera, respectively. Anti-SUMO reactivity was not observed in anti-ND-negative sera. Anti-SUMO-2 autoantibodies were found in 58% of sera containing autoantibodies against both PML and Sp100 and were detected exclusively in sera containing anti-Sp100 autoantibodies. In conclusion, SUMO proteins constitute a novel and independent class of autoantigens in PBC. Furthermore, we believe our data emphasize the post-translational modification of lysine by either lipoylation in the case of AMA or SUMOylation in the case of specific anti-ND autoantibodies as the pivotal site for autoantibody generation in PBC.Hepatology 04/2005; 41(3):609-16. · 11.66 Impact Factor