Publications (42) View all
-
Article: Early comparison of nephrectomy options in children (open, transperitoneal laparoscopic, laparo-endoscopic single site (LESS), and robotic surgery).
BJU International 08/2011; 109(6):915-6. · 2.84 Impact Factor -
Article: Can we rely on the presence of dextranomer-hyaluronic acid copolymer mounds on ultrasound to predict vesicoureteral reflux resolution after injection therapy?
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: We determined whether the presence or absence of dextranomer-hyaluronic acid copolymer mounds on bladder ultrasound coincides with voiding cystourethrogram results after injection therapy in children with primary vesicoureteral reflux. We retrospectively reviewed consecutive cases of dextranomer-hyaluronic acid copolymer injection for primary vesicoureteral reflux. The primary outcome investigated was the appearance of dextranomer-hyaluronic acid copolymer mounds on ultrasound and their association with voiding cystourethrogram results postoperatively. An intramural dextranomer-hyaluronic acid copolymer mound on ultrasound was considered a negative test result for vesicoureteral reflux. A total of 187 cases were identified, of which 132 had imaging available for evaluation. Intramural mounds were seen on ultrasound in 86 cases postoperatively, of which 34 (40%) had a positive voiding cystourethrogram. Of 46 cases in which no mound was identified 21 (46%) had a positive voiding cystourethrogram. The sensitivity of ultrasound to determine the presence or absence of vesicoureteral reflux was 38%, specificity was 67%, accuracy was 55%, the positive predictive value was 46% and the negative predictive value was 60%. Our results indicate poor correlation of dextranomer-hyaluronic acid copolymer mound appearance on ultrasound with voiding cystourethrogram results after injection. To adequately evaluate for the resolution of vesicoureteral reflux a voiding cystogram or nuclear medicine cystogram needs to be performed after injection therapy.The Journal of urology 06/2011; 185(6 Suppl):2536-41. · 4.02 Impact Factor -
Article: Comparison of the learning curve and outcomes of robotic assisted pediatric pyeloplasty.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: We compared the learning curve and outcomes in children undergoing robotic assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty during the initiation of a robotic surgery program compared to the benchmark of open pyeloplasty. The records of our first consecutive 33 children undergoing robotic assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty from 2006 to 2009 were retrospectively reviewed and compared to those of age and gender matched children who underwent open repair done by senior faculty surgeons before the initiation of our robotic surgery program. We compared operative time, complications, postoperative pain, length of stay and surgical success for 2 surgeons who adopted the robotic approach at an academic teaching institution. We found no significant differences in length of stay, pain score or surgical success at a median followup of 16 months. The number of complications was similar and they tended to be early and technical in the robotic assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty group. Overall average operative time was 90 minutes longer (38%) for robotic assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (p <0.004). When evaluated chronologically, there was evidence of a learning curve. After 15 to 20 robotic cases overall operative times for robotic assisted laparoscopic cases was consistently within 1 SD of our average open pyeloplasty time with no significant difference in overall operative time (p = 0.23). Of the decrease in overall operative time 70% was due to decreased pyeloplasty time rather than peripheral time. There was similar safety and efficacy with robotic assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty, although complications tended to be technical and early in our initial experience. Operative time decreased with experience and after 15 to 20 cases it was similar to that of open pyeloplasty with similar outcomes and surgical success.The Journal of urology 06/2011; 185(6 Suppl):2517-22. · 4.02 Impact Factor -
Article: Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for Wilms' tumor: oncologic considerations.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Wilms' tumor is the most common malignant renal tumor of childhood. Surgical resection is an important aspect of therapy and is traditionally performed through an open transabdominal approach. The advent of advanced laparoscopic techniques for benign renal lesions has led to interest in applying a minimally invasive approach to Wilms' tumors in children. We describe a 2-year-old girl who presented with a right renal mass measuring 18 × 13 cm with peritoneal seeding and pulmonary metastatic disease. Wilms' tumor was confirmed on open biopsy. After neoadjuvant chemotherapy, a laparoscopic resection of the tumor with right radical nephroureterectomy, retroperitoneal lymph node dissection, and resection of peritoneal metastases was achieved using one 12-mm and four 5-mm ports. The specimens were removed in an endoscopic retrieval bag through a small Pfannenstiel incision by extending the 12-mm port site. The patient had an uncomplicated recovery and was discharged on the fifth post-operative day. She remains disease free at 19 months postoperatively. Minimally invasive techniques may be considered for resection of Wilms' tumor provided oncologic principles are carefully followed.Journal of Pediatric Surgery 05/2011; 46(5):978-82. · 1.45 Impact Factor -
Article: Initiation of a pediatric robotic surgery program: institutional challenges and realistic outcomes.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Few institutions have reported their experience initiating a pediatric robot-assisted laparoscopic (RAL) program, and results vary regarding the outcomes for robotic surgery in children. We present the initiation of our pediatric robotic surgery program, provide suggestions for overcoming institutional challenges, and perform a comparative analysis to illustrate realistic outcomes during the learning curve. Outcomes from consecutive children who underwent RAL surgery since the 2006 acquisition of the da Vinci® surgical system were retrospectively reviewed. To evaluate the safety and outcomes during the introduction of this new technology, we performed an outcome analysis of ureteral reimplantations comparing RAL cases to matched open controls. The first 50 RAL cases were performed over 20 months by two general and two urologic surgeons. Fourteen different procedures were performed successfully. The average patient age was 8.6 ± 5.7 years with 10 patients weighing less than 10 kg (20%). Three urologic cases were converted to traditional laparoscopy and two general surgery cases were converted to open. There were five mechanical failures. Initial outcomes comparing RAL and open ureteral reimplantations revealed similar length of stay, complications, and success with lower estimated blood loss in the RAL group. Overall OR time was 53% longer in the RAL reimplant group (361 ± 80 vs. 236 ± 58 min, p < 0.0001). Robotic surgery appears to be safe in pediatric patients for many procedures. Proper instruction and training precedes technological proficiency. The institutional learning curve may be magnified when there are multiple participating surgeons. Operative times for initial RAL cases can be expected to be greater than their open correlates.Surgical Endoscopy 04/2010; 24(11):2803-8. · 4.01 Impact Factor
