Publications (15) View all
-
Article: Intravenous administration of adenosine triphosphate disodium during primary percutaneous coronary intervention attenuates the transient rapid improvement of myocardial wall motion, not myocardial stunning, shortly after recanalization in acute anterior myocardial infarction.
Takehito Tokuyama, Tadamichi Sakuma, Chikaaki Motoda, Tomoharu Kawase, Ryou Takeda, Shinji Mito, Hiromichi Tamekiyo, Masaya Otsuka, Tomokazu Okimoto, Mamoru Toyofuku, Hidekazu Hirao, Yuji Muraoka, Hironori Ueda, Yoshiko Masaoka, Yasuhiko Hayashi[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Administration of adenosine attenuates myocardial stunning after reperfusion in a canine experimental ischemic model. However, it is unknown whether administration of adenosine triphosphate disodium (ATP) during reperfusion can attenuate myocardial stunning after coronary recanalization in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI). Therefore, we sought to elucidate the effects of ATP administration on serial changes of left ventricular systolic function before and after coronary recanalization. In 27 patients with first ST-elevation acute anterior MI, in whom primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was completed within 10 h after symptom onset, ATP at a mean rate of 103 microg/kg/min (n=16) or normal saline (n=11) was intravenously administered for 1 h during reperfusion. Left ventricular regional wall motion within the initially severely ischemic region was serially analyzed using the standard wall motion score index (WMSI) by transthoracic echocardiography. Means of WMSIs were similar shortly before primary PCI in both groups (2.79 in ATP group and 2.69 in controls). They changed to 2.56 and 2.22 shortly after PCI, 2.49 and 2.39 on day 2, 2.34 and 2.30 on day 3, 2.19 and 2.25 on day 10, and 1.85 and 2.02, 6 months later, respectively. Transient improved regional wall motion within the initially severely ischemic region was observed shortly after PCI in controls (10.3% of observed segments); however, it was significantly suppressed in the ATP group (2.55%). The percent recovery of WMSI on day 10, which was defined as WMSI on day 10 normalized by improvement of WMSI for 6 months, was 63.8% in ATP group and 65.7% in controls, implying ATP administration could not reduce myocardial stunning by day 10 after primary PCI. The high-dose administration of ATP during primary PCI prevented transient improved wall motion shortly after coronary recanalization rather than preventing left ventricular stunning. These results suggest that ATP can prevent reperfusion injury during primary PCI.Journal of Cardiology 10/2009; 54(2):289-96. · 1.28 Impact Factor -
Article: Clinical outcomes of sirolimus-eluting stenting after rotational atherectomy.
Hiromichi Tamekiyo, Yasuhiko Hayashi, Mamoru Toyofuku, Hironori Ueda, Tadamichi Sakuma, Tomokazu Okimoto, Masaya Otsuka, Michinori Imazu, Yasuki Kihara[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The efficacy of drug-eluting stents after rotational atherectomy (ROTA) has not been clarified. The 704 consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with a sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) (79 with and 625 without ROTA) were enrolled. The 2-year clinical outcome of these patients was compared with that of a group of 1,123 consecutive patients treated with bare-metal stents (BMS) (144 with and 979 without ROTA). At 2 years after index PCI, the use of SES after ROTA was associated with a lower crude incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) than were BMS after ROTA (30.1% vs 43.1%, P=0.024). The difference was mainly derived from the reduction in target lesion revascularization (TLR) (25.0% vs 39.1%, P=0.022). After adjusting for confounders, ROTA-SES was associated with a reduction in MACE and TLR, with a similar hazard ratio to the non-ROTA group only with SES implantation. In a subgroup of dialysis patients, the incidence of TLR after ROTA with SES and BMS was similarly high. The use of SES after ROTA is an appropriate method for selected hard lesions, but has a limited effect in dialysis patients, even after lesion preparation with ROTA.Circulation Journal 09/2009; 73(11):2042-9. · 3.77 Impact Factor -
Article: Exogenous adenosine triphosphate disodium administration during primary percutaneous coronary intervention reduces no-reflow and preserves left ventricular function in patients with acute anterior myocardial infarction: a study using myocardial contrast echocardiography.
Tadamichi Sakuma, Chikaaki Motoda, Takehito Tokuyama, Toshiharu Oka, Hiromichi Tamekiyo, Takenori Okada, Masaya Otsuka, Tomokazu Okimoto, Mamoru Toyofuku, Hidekazu Hirao, Yuji Muraoka, Hironori Ueda, Yoshiko Masaoka, Yasuhiko Hayashi[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: It is unknown whether adenosine triphosphate disodium (ATP) administration during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is useful in anterior acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The study was a prospective, non-randomized, open-label trial. Primary PCI was successfully performed in 204 consecutive patients with first anterior AMI. ATP at a mean dose of 117 microg/kg/min for 45 min on an average was infused intravenously during PCI in 100 patients (Group 1). In the other 104 patients, normal saline was administered (Group 2). ST-segment resolution (STR) was estimated 90 min after recanalization. The no-reflow ratio was measured 2 weeks later, using intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), LV regional wall motion (LVRWM), and LV end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVI) were measured 6 months later. Baseline patient characteristics of the two groups were similar, including TIMI risk scores. Significant STR (> or =50% resolution compared to baseline) (66% versus 50%; Group 1 versus Group 2, p=0.02), no-reflow ratio (24% versus 34%, indicated by mean values, p=0.02), LVEF (61% versus 55%, p=0.0007), LVRWM (-1.56 versus -2.05, using the SD/chord, p=0.0001), and LVEDVI (60 ml/m(2) versus 71 ml/m(2), p=0.0007) were significantly better in Group 1, and the no-reflow ratio, LVEF, LVRWM and LVEDVI were significantly better in ATP-administered patients, regardless of antecedent angina or advanced age. ATP Administration was consistently identified as a significant determinant for STR, no-reflow ratio, LVEF, LVRWM, and LVEDVI. Intravenous ATP administration during reperfusion is an independent determinant of STR and the no-reflow ratio, and LVEF, LVRWM, and LVEDVI at 6 months after primary PCI.International journal of cardiology 12/2008; 140(2):200-9. · 7.08 Impact Factor -
Article: One-year clinical outcomes of dialysis patients after implantation with sirolimus-eluting coronary stents.
Takenori Okada, Yasuhiko Hayashi, Mamoru Toyofuku, Michinori Imazu, Masaya Otsuka, Tadamichi Sakuma, Hironori Ueda, Hideya Yamamoto, Nobuoki Kohno[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The efficacy of sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs) has not been established in dialysis patients. This study was a non-randomized observational single-center registry in a community hospital: data for 80 consecutive dialysis patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with SES were compared with those of a historical group of consecutive 124 dialysis patients treated with bare-metal stents (BMS). After 1 year, the cumulative incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), comprising cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, or target lesion revascularization (TLR), was 25.2% in the SES group and 38.2% in the BMS group (p=0.048). In multivariate analysis, use of SES remained an independent predictor of MACE at 1 year after PCI (risk ratio 0.70, 95% confidence interval 0.52-0.93, p=0.015). Rates of TLR were 21.7% in the SES group and 30.9% in the BMS group and (p=0.15). Subgroup analysis showed that use of SES was effective in patients with small vessels, non-diabetic patients, and patients without highly calcified lesions. In dialysis patients, the implantation of SES was moderately effective in reducing MACE at 1 year after PCI as compared with BMS. However, the TLR rate at 1 year was relatively higher than previously reported.Circulation Journal 10/2008; 72(9):1430-5. · 3.77 Impact Factor -
Article: [Prophylactic intraaortic balloon pumping preserves left ventricular systolic function in acute anterior myocardial infarction without cardiogenic shock].
Tomiharu Niida, Tadamichi Sakuma, Chikaaki Motoda, Takehito Tokuyama, Toshiharu Oka, Takenori Okada, Masaya Otsuka, Mamoru Toyofuku, Hidekazu Hirao, Yuji Muraoka, Hironori Ueda, Yoshiko Masaoka, Yasuhiko Hayashi[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Left ventricular function and prognosis were evaluated in patients with acute myocardial infarction who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention supported by intraaortic balloon pumping. Fifty-eight consecutive patients with first acute myocardial infarction were treated between July 1999 and April 2006. Twenty-five had cardiogenic shock on admission, whereas 33 did not. Patients with anterior acute myocardial infarction without cardiogenic shock were divided into the prophylactic intraaortic balloon pumping group (Group 1; n=17) and the rescue intraaortic balloon pumping group (Group 2; n=9). Thirty-day in-hospital mortality was 52% in cardiogenic shock patients, and 3% in non-shock patients. Baseline characteristics of non-shock anterior acute myocardial infarction were similar including Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) risk scores (5.1 and 5.0) in the two groups. However, average left ventricular ejection fraction in the convalescent stage was superior in Group 1 (48.7% vs. 37.8%, p = 0.03). Thirty-day in-hospital mortality was 0% in Group 1 and 11% in Group 2 (p = 0.34). Cox's hazard ratio in Group 2 to Group 1 was 2.38 (95% confidence intrerval; 0.84-11.1, p = 0.09) in terms of the subsequent major cardiac events. Prophylactic use of intraaortic balloon pumping starting prior to primary percutaneous coronary intervention preserves the convalescent left ventricular systolic function in patients with high risk for anticipated cardiac events after anterior acute myocardial infarction without cardiogenic shock.Journal of Cardiology 12/2006; 48(5):243-51. · 1.28 Impact Factor