Publications (29) View all
-
Article: How to assess non-calcified plaque in CT angiography: delineation methods affect diagnostic accuracy of low-attenuation plaque by CT for lipid-core plaque in histology.
Christopher L Schlett, Maros Ferencik, Csilla Celeng, Pál Maurovich-Horvat, Hans Scheffel, Paul Stolzmann, Synho Do, Hans-Ulrich Kauczor, Hatem Alkadhi, Fabian Bamberg, Udo Hoffmann[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: AIMS: To compare the accuracy of two plaque delineation methods for coronary computed tomographic angiography (CTA) to identify lipid-core plaque (LCP) using histology as the reference standard. METHODS AND RESULTS: Five ex vivo hearts were analysed by CTA and histology. LCP was defined by histology as fibroatheroma with core diameter/circumference >200 μm/>60° and cap thickness <450 μm. In CTA, plaque was manually delineated either as the difference between the inner and outer vessel walls (Method A) or as a direct tracing of plaque (Method B). Low-attenuation plaque was defined as an area with <90 Hounsfield units. Of 446 co-registered cross-sections, 55 (12%) contained LCP. In CTA, low-attenuation plaque area was larger as assessed with Method A compared with Method B (difference: 120 ± 60%). Although low-attenuation plaque was associated with the presence of LCP, the delineation Method B yielded higher diagnostic accuracy than Method A [area under the curve (AUC): 0.831 vs. 0.780, respectively, P = 0.005]. After excluding 'normal' cross-sections by CTA (n = 117), AUC for detecting LCP became similar between both methods (0.767 vs. 0.729, P = 0.07, respectively). CONCLUSION: Low-attenuation plaque in CTA is a diagnostic tool for LCP but prone to error if plaque is defined as the area between the inner and outer vessel walls and normal cross-sections are included in the assessment.European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging. 05/2013; -
Article: Histogram Analysis of Lipid-Core Plaques in Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography: Ex Vivo Validation Against Histology.
Christopher L Schlett, Pál Maurovich-Horvat, Maros Ferencik, Hatem Alkadhi, Paul Stolzmann, Hans Scheffel, Harald Seifarth, Masataka Nakano, Synho Do, Marc Vorpahl, Hans-Ulrich Kauczor, Fabian Bamberg, Guillermo J Tearney, Renu Virmani, Udo Hoffmann[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: PURPOSE: In coronary computed tomographic angiography (CTA), low attenuation of coronary atherosclerotic plaque is associated with lipid-rich plaques. However, an overlap in Hounsfield units (HU) between fibrous and lipid-rich plaque as well as an influence of luminal enhancement on plaque attenuation was observed and may limit accurate detection of lipid-rich plaques by CTA. We sought to determine whether the quantitative histogram analysis improves accuracy of the detection of lipid-core plaque (LCP) in ex vivo hearts by validation against histological analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Human donor hearts were imaged with a 64-slice computed tomographic scanner using a standard coronary CTA protocol, optical coherence tomography (OCT), a histological analysis. Lipid-core plaque was defined in the histological analysis as any fibroatheroma with a lipid/necrotic core diameter of greater than 200 μm and a circumference greater than 60 degrees as well as a cap thickness of less than 450 μm. In OCT, lipid-rich plaque was determined as a signal-poor region with diffuse borders in 2 quadrants or more. In CTA, the boundaries of the noncalcified plaque were manually traced. The absolute and relative areas of low attenuation plaque based on pixels with less than 30, less than 60, and less than 90 HU were calculated using quantitative histogram analysis. RESULTS: From 5 hearts, a total of 446 cross sections were coregistered between CTA and the histological analysis. Overall, 55 LCPs (12%) were identified by the histological analysis. In CTA, the absolute and relative areas of low attenuation plaque less than 30, less than 60, and less than 90 HU were 0.14 (0.31) mm (4.22% [9.02%]), 0.69 (0.95) mm (18.28% [21.22%]), and 1.35 (1.54) mm (35.65% [32.07%]), respectively. The low attenuation plaque area correlated significantly with histological lipid content (lipid/necrotic core size [in square millimeter] and a portion of lipid/necrotic core on the entire plaque) at all thresholds but was the strongest at less than 60 HU (r = 0.53 and r = 0.48 for the absolute and relative areas, respectively). Using a threshold of 1.0 mm or greater, the absolute plaque area of less than 60 HU in CTA yielded 69% sensitivity and 80% specificity to detect LCP, whereas sensitivity and specificity were 73% and 71% for using 25.0% or higher relative area less than 60 HU. The discriminatory ability of CTA for LCP was similar between the absolute and relative areas (the area under the curve, 0.744 versus 0.722; P = 0.37). Notably, the association of the low attenuation plaque area in CTA with LCP was not altered by the luminal enhancement for the relative (P = 0.48) but for the absolute measurement (P = 0.03). Similar results were achieved when validated against lipid-rich plaque by OCT in a subset of 285 cross sections. CONCLUSIONS: In ex vivo conditions, the relative area of coronary atherosclerotic plaque less than 60 HU in CTA as derived from quantitative histogram analysis has good accuracy to detect LCP as compared with a histological analysis independent of differences in luminal contrast enhancement.Investigative radiology 04/2013; · 4.85 Impact Factor -
SourceAvailable from: Erin Corsini
Article: Evolution of coronary computed tomography radiation dose reduction at a tertiary referral center.
Brian Burns Ghoshhajra, Leif-Christopher Engel, Gyöngyi Petra Major, Alexander Goehler, Tust Techasith, Daniel Verdini, Synho Do, Bob Liu, Xinhua Li, Michiel Sala, [......], Priyanka Prakash, Manavjot S Sidhu, Erin Corsini, Dahlia Banerji, David Wu, Suhny Abbara, Quynh Truong, Thomas J Brady, Udo Hoffmann, Manudeep Kalra[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: We aimed to assess the temporal change in radiation doses from coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) during a 6-year period. High CCTA radiation doses have been reduced by multiple technologies that, if used appropriately, can decrease exposures significantly. A total of 1277 examinations performed from 2005 to 2010 were included. Univariate and multivariable regression analysis of patient- and scan-related variables was performed with estimated radiation dose as the main outcome measure. Median doses decreased by 74.8% (P<.001), from 13.1 millisieverts (mSv) (interquartile range 9.3-14.7) in period 1 to 3.3 mSv (1.8-6.7) in period 4. Factors associated with greatest dose reductions (P<.001) were all most frequently applied in period 4: axial-sequential acquisition (univariate: -8.0 mSv [-9.7 to -7.9]), high-pitch helical acquisition (univariate: -8.8 mSv [-9.3 to -7.9]), reduced tube voltage (100 vs 120 kV) (univariate: -6.4 mSv [-7.4 to -5.4]), and use of automatic exposure control (univariate: -5.3 mSv [-6.2 to -4.4]). CCTA radiation doses were reduced 74.8% through increasing use of dose-saving measures and evolving scanner technology.The American journal of medicine 06/2012; 125(8):764-72. · 4.47 Impact Factor -
Article: Comparison of hybrid and pure iterative reconstruction techniques with conventional filtered back projection: dose reduction potential in the abdomen.
Sarabjeet Singh, Mannudeep K Kalra, Synho Do, Jean Baptiste Thibault, Homer Pien, Owen O J Connor, Michael A Blake[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Assess the effect of filtered back projection (FBP) and hybrid (adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction [ASIR]) and pure (model-based iterative reconstruction [MBIR]) iterative reconstructions on abdominal computed tomography (CT) acquired with 75% radiation dose reduction. In an institutional review board-approved prospective study, 10 patients (mean [standard deviation] age, 60 (8) years; 4 men and 6 women) gave informed consent for acquisition of additional abdominal images on 64-slice multidetector-row CT (GE 750HD, GE Healthcare). Scanning was repeated over a 10-cm scan length at 200 and 50 milliampere second (mA s), with remaining parameters held constant at 120 kilovolt (peak), 0.984:1 pitch, and standard reconstruction kernel. Projection data were deidentified, exported, and reconstructed to obtain 4 data sets (200-mA s FBP, 50-mA s FBP, 50-mA s ASIR, 50-mA s MBIR), which were evaluated by 2 abdominal radiologists for lesions and subjective image quality. Objective noise and noise spectral density were measured for each image series. Among the 10 patients, the maximum weight recorded was 123 kg, with maximum transverse diameter measured as 43.7 cm. Lesion conspicuity at 50-mA s MBIR was better than on 50-mA s FBP and ASIR images (P < 0.01). Image noise was rated as suboptimal on low-dose FBP and ASIR but deemed acceptable in MBIR images. Objective noise with 50-mA s MBIR was 2 to 3 folds lower compared to 50-mA s ASIR, 50-mA s FBP, and 200-mA s FBP (P < 0.0001). Noise spectral density analyses demonstrated that ASIR retains the noise spectrum signature of FBP, whereas MBIR has much lower noise with a more regularized noise spectrum pattern. Model-based iterative reconstruction renders acceptable image quality and diagnostic confidence in 50- mA s abdominal CT images, whereas FBP and ASIR images are associated with suboptimal image quality at this radiation dose level.Journal of computer assisted tomography 05/2012; 36(3):347-53. · 1.38 Impact Factor -
Article: Automated Quantification of Pneumothorax in CT.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: An automated, computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) algorithm for the quantification of pneumothoraces from Multidetector Computed Tomography (MDCT) images has been developed. Algorithm performance was evaluated through comparison to manual segmentation by expert radiologists. A combination of two-dimensional and three-dimensional processing techniques was incorporated to reduce required processing time by two-thirds (as compared to similar techniques). Volumetric measurements on relative pneumothorax size were obtained and the overall performance of the automated method shows an average error of just below 1%.Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine 01/2012; 2012:736320. · 0.68 Impact Factor